Literature DB >> 22084848

The return of results of deceased research participants.

Anne Marie Tassé1.   

Abstract

The death of a research participant raises numerous ethical and legal issues regarding the return of research results to related family members. This question is particularly acute in the context of genetic research since the research results from an individual may be relevant to each of the biological relatives. This paper first investigates the ethical and legal frameworks governing the return of a deceased participant's individual research results to his or her related family members. Then, it weighs the rights and interests of both the deceased individual and related family members in an attempt to identify key ethical considerations underlying the return of such results. This analysis of international guidelines and national laws and regulations reveals that though the legal framework regarding privacy and confidentiality of clinical and research information is well established (albeit not homogenous), guidelines are generally absent in the post-mortem context. Nevertheless, a brief analysis of this issue through two ethical perspectives (principlism and consequentialism) allows us to identify six key elements to be taken into consideration when returning a deceased participant's research results.
© 2011 American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22084848     DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00629.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Law Med Ethics        ISSN: 1073-1105            Impact factor:   1.718


  15 in total

1.  Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Gloria M Petersen; Susan M Wolf; Kari G Chaffee; Marguerite E Robinson; Deborah R Gordon; Noralane M Lindor; Barbara A Koenig
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

2.  Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Rebecca Branum; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

3.  Attitudes Toward Return of Genetic Research Results to Relatives, Including After Death: Comparison of Cancer Probands, Blood Relatives, and Spouse/Partners.

Authors:  Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Susan M Wolf; Kari G Chaffee; Marguerite E Robinson; Noralane M Lindor; Deborah R Gordon; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 1.742

4.  The ever-evolving concept of clinical significance and the potential for sins of omission in genetic research.

Authors:  Gregory Costain; Anne S Bassett
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 11.229

5.  Return of Genetic Research Results to Participants and Families: IRB Perspectives and Roles.

Authors:  Laura M Beskow; P Pearl O'Rourke
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

6.  INTRODUCTION: Return of Research Results: What About the Family?

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

7.  International Policies on Sharing Genomic Research Results with Relatives: Approaches to Balancing Privacy with Access.

Authors:  Rebecca Branum; Susan M Wolf
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 8.  Next-Generation Sequencing and the Return of Results.

Authors:  Bartha Maria Knoppers; Minh Thu Nguyen; Karine Sénécal; Anne Marie Tassé; Ma'n H Zawati
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 9.  Confidentiality & the Risk of Genetic Discrimination: What Surgeons Need to Know.

Authors:  Amanda Gammon; Deborah W Neklason
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2015-07-16       Impact factor: 3.495

10.  Pragmatic Tools for Sharing Genomic Research Results with the Relatives of Living and Deceased Research Participants.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Emily Scholtes; Barbara A Koenig; Gloria M Petersen; Susan A Berry; Laura M Beskow; Mary B Daly; Conrad V Fernandez; Robert C Green; Bonnie S LeRoy; Noralane M Lindor; P Pearl O'Rourke; Carmen Radecki Breitkopf; Mark A Rothstein; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 1.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.