Literature DB >> 22084210

When does a radiologist's recommendation for follow-up result in high-cost imaging?

Susanna I Lee1, Arun Krishnaraj, Manjil Chatterji, Keith J Dreyer, James H Thrall, Peter F Hahn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure the proportion of high-cost imaging generated by a radiologist's recommendation and to identify the imaging findings resulting in follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective HIPAA-compliant study had institutional review board approval, with waiver of informed consent. A recommended examination was defined as one performed within a single episode of care (defined as fewer than 60 days after the initial imaging) following a radiologist's recommendation in a prior examination report. Chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT), brain and lumbar spine magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and body positron emission tomography were included for analysis. From a database of all radiology examinations (approximately 200,000) at one institution over a 6-month period, a computerized search identified all high-cost examinations that were preceded by an examination containing a radiologist recommendation. Medical records were reviewed to verify accuracy of the recommending-recommended examination pairs and to determine the reason for the radiologist's recommendation. For proportions, 95% confidence intervals were calculated.
RESULTS: Overall, 1558 of 29,232 (5.3%) high-cost examinations followed a radiologist's recommendation. Chest CT was the high-cost examination most often resulting from a radiologist's recommendation (878 of 9331, 9.4%), followed by abdominal CT (390 of 10,258, 3.8%) and brain MR imaging (222 of 6436, 3.4%). The examination types with the highest numbers of follow-up examinations were chest radiography (n=431), chest CT (n=410), abdominal CT (n=214), and abdominal ultrasonography (n=120). The most common findings resulting in follow-up were pulmonary nodules or masses (559 of 1558, 35.9%), other pulmonary abnormalities (150 of 1558, 9.6%), adenopathy (103 of 1558, 6.6%), renal lesions (101 of 1558, 6.5%), and negative examination findings (101 of 1558, 6.5%).
CONCLUSION: Radiologists' recommendations account for only a small proportion of outpatient high-cost imaging examinations. Pulmonary nodule follow-up is the most common cause for radiologist-generated examinations. © RSNA, 2011

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22084210     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.11111091

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  9 in total

1.  Recommendations for additional imaging on emergency department CT examinations: comparison of emergency- and organ-based subspecialty radiologists.

Authors:  Andrew B Rosenkrantz; Brent W Matza; Mark P Foran; John M McMenamy
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2012-10-05

2.  Relevant incidental findings at abdominal multi-detector contrast-enhanced computed tomography: A collateral screening?

Authors:  Luca Maria Sconfienza; Giovanni Mauri; Claudia Muzzupappa; Alessandro Poloni; Michele Bandirali; Anastassia Esseridou; Stefania Tritella; Francesco Secchi; Giovanni Di Leo; Francesco Sardanelli
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-10-28

3.  Deciding why and when to use CT in children: a radiologist's perspective.

Authors:  Donald P Frush
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2014-10-11

4.  Radiology reports for incidental thyroid nodules on CT and MRI: high variability across subspecialties.

Authors:  A T Grady; J A Sosa; T P Tanpitukpongse; K R Choudhury; R T Gupta; J K Hoang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Redundant Neurovascular Imaging: Who Is to Blame and What Is the Value?

Authors:  E Beheshtian; S Emamzadehfard; S Sahraian; R Jalilianhasanpour; D M Yousem
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Diagnostic yield of recommendations for chest CT examination prompted by outpatient chest radiographic findings.

Authors:  H Benjamin Harvey; Matthew D Gilman; Carol C Wu; Matthew S Cushing; Elkan F Halpern; Jing Zhao; Pari V Pandharipande; Jo-Anne O Shepard; Tarik K Alkasab
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-12-22       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Dependency of image quality on acquisition protocol and image processing in chest tomosynthesis-a visual grading study based on clinical data.

Authors:  Masoud Jadidi; Magnus Båth; Sven Nyrén
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Effect of intravenous contrast for CT abdomen and pelvis on detection of urgent and non-urgent pathology: can repeat CT within 72 hours be avoided?

Authors:  Christine Lamoureux; Scott Weber; Tarek Hanna; Andrew J Grabiel; Reese H Clark
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2019-07-22

9.  The fate of radiology report recommendations at a pediatric medical center.

Authors:  Bonmyong Lee; Hansel J Otero; Matthew T Whitehead
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2017-08-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.