Literature DB >> 22081780

STATE-SPACE SOLUTIONS TO THE DYNAMIC MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY INVERSE PROBLEM USING HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING.

Christopher J Long1, Patrick L Purdon, Simona Temereanca, Neil U Desai, Matti S Hämäläinen, Emery N Brown.   

Abstract

Determining the magnitude and location of neural sources within the brain that are responsible for generating magnetoencephalography (MEG) signals measured on the surface of the head is a challenging problem in functional neuroimaging. The number of potential sources within the brain exceeds by an order of magnitude the number of recording sites. As a consequence, the estimates for the magnitude and location of the neural sources will be ill-conditioned because of the underdetermined nature of the problem. One well-known technique designed to address this imbalance is the minimum norm estimator (MNE). This approach imposes an L(2) regularization constraint that serves to stabilize and condition the source parameter estimates. However, these classes of regularizer are static in time and do not consider the temporal constraints inherent to the biophysics of the MEG experiment. In this paper we propose a dynamic state-space model that accounts for both spatial and temporal correlations within and across candidate intra-cortical sources. In our model, the observation model is derived from the steady-state solution to Maxwell's equations while the latent model representing neural dynamics is given by a random walk process. We show that the Kalman filter (KF) and the Kalman smoother [also known as the fixed-interval smoother (FIS)] may be used to solve the ensuing high-dimensional state-estimation problem. Using a well-known relationship between Bayesian estimation and Kalman filtering, we show that the MNE estimates carry a significant zero bias. Calculating these high-dimensional state estimates is a computationally challenging task that requires High Performance Computing (HPC) resources. To this end, we employ the NSF Teragrid Supercomputing Network to compute the source estimates. We demonstrate improvement in performance of the state-space algorithm relative to MNE in analyses of simulated and actual somatosensory MEG experiments. Our findings establish the benefits of high-dimensional state-space modeling as an effective means to solve the MEG source localization problem.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22081780      PMCID: PMC3212953          DOI: 10.1214/11-AOAS483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Appl Stat        ISSN: 1932-6157            Impact factor:   2.083


  25 in total

1.  Recursive penalized least squares solution for dynamical inverse problems of EEG generation.

Authors:  Okito Yamashita; Andreas Galka; Tohru Ozaki; Rolando Biscay; Pedro Valdes-Sosa
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  MEG source localization under multiple constraints: an extended Bayesian framework.

Authors:  Jérémie Mattout; Christophe Phillips; William D Penny; Michael D Rugg; Karl J Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Multiple dipole modeling and localization from spatio-temporal MEG data.

Authors:  J C Mosher; P S Lewis; R M Leahy
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  A distributed spatio-temporal EEG/MEG inverse solver.

Authors:  Wanmei Ou; Matti S Hämäläinen; Polina Golland
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Global optimization in the localization of neuromagnetic sources.

Authors:  K Uutela; M Hämäläinen; R Salmelin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering.

Authors:  B D Van Veen; W van Drongelen; M Yuchtman; A Suzuki
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data.

Authors:  M S Hämäläinen; J Sarvas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Low resolution electromagnetic tomography: a new method for localizing electrical activity in the brain.

Authors:  R D Pascual-Marqui; C M Michel; D Lehmann
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 2.997

9.  Robust Bayesian estimation of the location, orientation, and time course of multiple correlated neural sources using MEG.

Authors:  David P Wipf; Julia P Owen; Hagai T Attias; Kensuke Sekihara; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Combining fMRI with EEG and MEG in order to relate patterns of brain activity to cognition.

Authors:  Walter J Freeman; Seppo P Ahlfors; Vinod Menon
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 2.997

View more
  10 in total

1.  The virtual brain integrates computational modeling and multimodal neuroimaging.

Authors:  Petra Ritter; Michael Schirner; Anthony R McIntosh; Viktor K Jirsa
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2013

2.  A Subspace Pursuit-based Iterative Greedy Hierarchical solution to the neuromagnetic inverse problem.

Authors:  Behtash Babadi; Gabriel Obregon-Henao; Camilo Lamus; Matti S Hämäläinen; Emery N Brown; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Time-frequency mixed-norm estimates: sparse M/EEG imaging with non-stationary source activations.

Authors:  A Gramfort; D Strohmeier; J Haueisen; M S Hämäläinen; M Kowalski
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  A spatiotemporal dynamic distributed solution to the MEG inverse problem.

Authors:  Camilo Lamus; Matti S Hämäläinen; Simona Temereanca; Emery N Brown; Patrick L Purdon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  NLGC: Network localized Granger causality with application to MEG directional functional connectivity analysis.

Authors:  Behrad Soleimani; Proloy Das; I M Dushyanthi Karunathilake; Stefanie E Kuchinsky; Jonathan Z Simon; Behtash Babadi
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 7.400

6.  Intracardiac Inverse Potential Mapping Using the Method of Fundamental Solutions.

Authors:  Shu Meng; Nicholas Sunderland; Judit Chamorro-Servent; Laura R Bear; Nigel A Lever; Gregory B Sands; Ian J LeGrice; Anne M Gillis; Jichao Zhao; David M Budgett; Bruce H Smaill
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  A Real-Time Magnetoencephalography Brain-Computer Interface Using Interactive 3D Visualization and the Hadoop Ecosystem.

Authors:  Wilbert A McClay; Nancy Yadav; Yusuf Ozbek; Andy Haas; Hagaii T Attias; Srikantan S Nagarajan
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2015-09-30

8.  Ant Colony System Optimization for Spatiotemporal Modelling of Combined EEG and MEG Data.

Authors:  Eugene A Opoku; Syed Ejaz Ahmed; Yin Song; Farouk S Nathoo
Journal:  Entropy (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.524

9.  Contextual MEG and EEG Source Estimates Using Spatiotemporal LSTM Networks.

Authors:  Christoph Dinh; John G Samuelsson; Alexander Hunold; Matti S Hämäläinen; Sheraz Khan
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Altered resting state brain dynamics in temporal lobe epilepsy can be observed in spectral power, functional connectivity and graph theory metrics.

Authors:  Maher A Quraan; Cornelia McCormick; Melanie Cohn; Taufik A Valiante; Mary Pat McAndrews
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.