Literature DB >> 22081113

Epidrum(®): a new device to identify the epidural space with an epidural Tuohy needle.

Atsushi Sawada1, Natsumi Kii, Yusuke Yoshikawa, Michiaki Yamakage.   

Abstract

Epidrum(®) is an optimal pressure, loss of resistance device for identifying the epidural space. We investigated the usefulness of Epidrum versus the loss of resistance or hanging drop techniques while performing epidural anesthesia. Eighty adult patients who were scheduled for elective surgery under lumbar epidural anesthesia were randomized into two groups. The first group (Epidrum group) consisted of 40 adult patients who were scheduled for epidural anesthesia using Epidrum. The second group (control group) consisted of 40 adult patients who were scheduled for epidural anesthesia using the loss of resistance or hanging drop technique. We recorded the time required to identify the epidural space and outcomes of epidural catheterization. The attending anesthesiologists were also questioned regarding the ease of control of the Tuohy needle and of epidural space identification with each method. The time required to perform epidural anesthesia was significantly shorter in the Epidrum group than in the control group [28 s (10-76) vs. 90 s (34-185); median (interquartile range)] (p < 0.05). Tuohy needle control was significantly easier in the Epidrum group than in the control group (p < 0.05). Epidrum is useful for performing epidural anesthesia quickly while obtaining good Tuohy needle control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22081113     DOI: 10.1007/s00540-011-1278-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anesth        ISSN: 0913-8668            Impact factor:   2.078


  6 in total

1.  Clinical results with the acoustic puncture assist device, a new acoustic device to identify the epidural space.

Authors:  Timo J Lechner; Maarten G van Wijk; Ad J Maas; Frank R van Dorsten; Ronald A Drost; Chris J Langenberg; Leo J Teunissen; Paul H Cornelissen; Jan van Niekerk
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  A dual technique for identification of the epidural space.

Authors:  S Jacob; E Tierney
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 6.955

Review 3.  Epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Their role in postoperative outcome.

Authors:  S Liu; R L Carpenter; J M Neal
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Genesis of the 'true' negative pressure in the lumbar epidural space. A new hypothesis.

Authors:  E Zarzur
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 6.955

5.  Incidence of epidural catheter replacement in parturients: a retrospective chart review.

Authors:  S Eappen; A Blinn; S Segal
Journal:  Int J Obstet Anesth       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 2.603

6.  Clinical results with a new acoustic device to identify the epidural space.

Authors:  T J M Lechner; M G F van Wijk; A J J Maas
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.955

  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  A pilot study to compare epidural identification and catheterization using a saline-filled syringe versus a continuous hydrostatic pressure system.

Authors:  Yasser M Samhan; Hossam H El-Sabae; Hanan F Khafagy; Mohamed A Maher
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.078

2.  A proposal of a simple epidural simulator for training novice anesthesiologists.

Authors:  Sung-Moon Jeong; Jae Moon Choi; Ji Hyun Kim; Hwanhee Yoo; Sukyung Lee; Hyungseok Seo; Sooyoung Kim; Sung-Hoon Kim
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Raman Spectroscopy Differentiates Each Tissue from the Skin to the Spinal Cord: A Novel Method for Epidural Needle Placement?

Authors:  T Anthony Anderson; Jeon Woong Kang; Tatyana Gubin; Ramachandra R Dasari; Peter T C So
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Acoustic puncture assist device™ versus conventional loss of resistance technique for thoracic paravertebral space identification: Clinical and ultrasound evaluation.

Authors:  Monaz Abdulrahman Ali; Ashraf Abualhasan Abdellatif
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

Review 5.  Localization of epidural space: A review of available technologies.

Authors:  Hesham Elsharkawy; Abraham Sonny; Ki Jinn Chin
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

6.  Feasibility of Using the Epidural Space Detecting Device (EPI-DetectionTM) for Interlaminar Cervical Epidural Injection.

Authors:  Jiin Kang; Sam Sun Park; Chul Hwan Kim; Eui Chul Kim; Hyung Cheol Kim; Hyungseok Jeon; Kyung Hyun Kim; Dong Ah Shin
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  FBG-Based Soft System for Assisted Epidural Anesthesia: Design Optimization and Clinical Assessment.

Authors:  Francesca De Tommasi; Chiara Romano; Daniela Lo Presti; Carlo Massaroni; Massimiliano Carassiti; Emiliano Schena
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-16

Review 8.  Air versus saline in the loss of resistance technique for identification of the epidural space.

Authors:  Pedro L Antibas; Paulo do Nascimento Junior; Leandro G Braz; João Vitor Pereira Doles; Norma S P Módolo; Regina El Dib
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-07-18
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.