Literature DB >> 22080643

A multicenter mortality prediction model for patients receiving prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Shannon S Carson1, Jeremy M Kahn, Catherine L Hough, Eric J Seeley, Douglas B White, Ivor S Douglas, Christopher E Cox, Ellen Caldwell, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Joanne M Garrett, Gordon D Rubenfeld.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Significant deficiencies exist in the communication of prognosis for patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation after acute illness, in part because of clinician uncertainty about long-term outcomes. We sought to refine a mortality prediction model for patients requiring prolonged ventilation using a multicentered study design.
DESIGN: Cohort study.
SETTING: Five geographically diverse tertiary care medical centers in the United States (California, Colorado, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Washington). PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty adult patients who received at least 21 days of mechanical ventilation after acute illness.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: For the probability model, we included age, platelet count, and requirement for vasopressors and/or hemodialysis, each measured on day 21 of mechanical ventilation, in a logistic regression model with 1-yr mortality as the outcome variable. We subsequently modified a simplified prognostic scoring rule (ProVent score) by categorizing the risk variables (age 18-49, 50-64, and ≥65 yrs; platelet count 0-150 and >150; vasopressors; hemodialysis) in another logistic regression model and assigning points to variables according to β coefficient values. Overall mortality at 1 yr was 48%. The area under the curve of the receiver operator characteristic curve for the primary ProVent probability model was 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.75-0.81), and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .89. The area under the curve for the categorical model was 0.77, and the p value for the goodness-of-fit statistic was .34. The area under the curve for the ProVent score was 0.76, and the p value for the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit statistic was .60. For the 50 patients with a ProVent score >2, only one patient was able to be discharged directly home, and 1-yr mortality was 86%.
CONCLUSION: The ProVent probability model is a simple and reproducible model that can accurately identify patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation who are at high risk of 1-yr mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22080643      PMCID: PMC3395423          DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182387d43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  44 in total

1.  Long-term acute care hospital utilization after critical illness.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Nicole M Benson; Dina Appleby; Shannon S Carson; Theodore J Iwashyna
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  Chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Judith E Nelson; Christopher E Cox; Aluko A Hope; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 21.405

3.  One-year trajectories of care and resource utilization for recipients of prolonged mechanical ventilation: a cohort study.

Authors:  Mark Unroe; Jeremy M Kahn; Shannon S Carson; Joseph A Govert; Tereza Martinu; Shailaja J Sathy; Alison S Clay; Jessica Chia; Alice Gray; James A Tulsky; Christopher E Cox
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Effectiveness trial of an intensive communication structure for families of long-stay ICU patients.

Authors:  Barbara J Daly; Sara L Douglas; Elizabeth O'Toole; Nahida H Gordon; Rana Hejal; Joel Peerless; James Rowbottom; Allan Garland; Craig Lilly; Clareen Wiencek; Ronald Hickman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 5.  Finding the right level of posthospital care: "We didn't realize there was any other option for him".

Authors:  Robert L Kane
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Expectations and outcomes of prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Christopher E Cox; Tereza Martinu; Shailaja J Sathy; Alison S Clay; Jessica Chia; Alice L Gray; Maren K Olsen; Joseph A Govert; Shannon S Carson; James A Tulsky
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 7.  Clinical nihilism in neuroemergencies.

Authors:  J Claude Hemphill; Douglas B White
Journal:  Emerg Med Clin North Am       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.264

8.  Growth in adult prolonged acute mechanical ventilation: implications for healthcare delivery.

Authors:  Marya D Zilberberg; Marjolein de Wit; Jason R Pirone; Andrew F Shorr
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Annette M O'Connor; Carol L Bennett; Dawn Stacey; Michael Barry; Nananda F Col; Karen B Eden; Vikki A Entwistle; Valerie Fiset; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Sara Khangura; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; David Rovner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-07-08

10.  A prognostic model for one-year mortality in patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Shannon S Carson; Joanne Garrett; Laura C Hanson; Joyce Lanier; Joe Govert; Mary C Brake; Dante L Landucci; Christopher E Cox; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 7.598

View more
  49 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to combat chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Jennifer M Maguire; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.687

Review 2.  Setting the vision: applied patient-reported outcomes and smart, connected digital healthcare systems to improve patient-centered outcomes prediction in critical illness.

Authors:  Nicholas G Wysham; Amy P Abernethy; Christopher E Cox
Journal:  Curr Opin Crit Care       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.687

3.  High burden of palliative needs among older intensive care unit survivors transferred to post-acute care facilities. a single-center study.

Authors:  Matthew R Baldwin; Hannah Wunsch; Paul A Reyfman; Wazim R Narain; Craig D Blinderman; Neil W Schluger; M Cary Reid; Mathew S Maurer; Nathan Goldstein; David J Lederer; Peter Bach
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2013-10

4.  Estimates of the need for palliative care consultation across united states intensive care units using a trigger-based model.

Authors:  May S Hua; Guohua Li; Craig D Blinderman; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Variation in mortality rates after admission to long-term acute care hospitals for ventilator weaning.

Authors:  Jeremy M Kahn; Billie S Davis; Tri Q Le; Jonathan G Yabes; Chung-Chou H Chang; Derek C Angus
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.425

Review 6.  The changing role of palliative care in the ICU.

Authors:  Rebecca A Aslakson; J Randall Curtis; Judith E Nelson
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Effective Care Practices in Patients Receiving Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation. An Ethnographic Study.

Authors:  Kimberly J Rak; Laura Ellen Ashcraft; Courtney C Kuza; Jessica C Fleck; Lisa C DePaoli; Derek C Angus; Amber E Barnato; Nicholas G Castle; Tina B Hershey; Jeremy M Kahn
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Factors effecting one-year outcome after mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Sibel Günay; Muzaffer Sariaydin; Ersin Günay
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Prolonged mechanical ventilation and chronic critical illness.

Authors:  Guillermo Bugedo; Mohamud Egal; Jan Bakker
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  To Trach or Not to Trach: Uncertainty in the Care of the Chronically Critically Ill.

Authors:  Thomas Bice; Judith E Nelson; Shannon S Carson
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.119

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.