Literature DB >> 22079116

The dynamic range of human lightness perception.

Ana Radonjić1, Sarah R Allred, Alan L Gilchrist, David H Brainard.   

Abstract

Natural viewing challenges the visual system with images that have a dynamic range of light intensity (luminance) that can approach 1,000,000:1 and that often exceeds 10,000:1 [1, 2]. The range of perceived surface reflectance (lightness), however, can be well approximated by the Munsell matte neutral scale (N 2.0/ to N 9.5/), consisting of surfaces whose reflectance varies by about 30:1. Thus, the visual system must map a large range of surface luminance onto a much smaller range of surface lightness. We measured this mapping in images with a dynamic range close to that of natural images. We studied simple images that lacked segmentation cues that would indicate multiple regions of illumination. We found a remarkable degree of compression: at a single image location, a stimulus luminance range of 5,905:1 can be mapped onto an extended lightness scale that has a reflectance range of 100:1. We characterized how the luminance-to-lightness mapping changes with stimulus context. Our data rule out theories that predict perceived lightness from luminance ratios or Weber contrast. A mechanistic model connects our data to theories of adaptation and provides insight about how the underlying visual response varies with context.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22079116      PMCID: PMC3244211          DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.10.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Biol        ISSN: 0960-9822            Impact factor:   10.834


  28 in total

1.  Optimal nonlinear codes for the perception of natural colours.

Authors:  T von der Twer; D I MacLeod
Journal:  Network       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.273

2.  A unified theory of brightness contrast and assimilation incorporating oriented multiscale spatial filtering and contrast normalization.

Authors:  Barbara Blakeslee; Mark E McCourt
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Profound contrast adaptation early in the visual pathway.

Authors:  Samuel G Solomon; Jonathan W Peirce; Neel T Dhruv; Peter Lennie
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-04-08       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Adjacency and surroundedness in the depth effect on lightness.

Authors:  Ana Radonjić; Dejan Todorović; Alan Gilchrist
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Discounting the background--the missing link in the explanation of chromatic induction.

Authors:  J Walraven
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  The relation between color discrimination and color constancy: when is optimal adaptation task dependent?

Authors:  Alicia B Abrams; James M Hillis; David H Brainard
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.026

7.  Brightness constancy and the nature of achromatic colors.

Authors:  H WALLACH
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-06

8.  Dynamic shifts of the contrast-response function.

Authors:  J D Victor; M M Conte; K P Purpura
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.241

9.  The dual role of chromatic backgrounds in color perception.

Authors:  S K Shevell
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  S-potentials from colour units in the retina of fish (Cyprinidae).

Authors:  K I Naka; W A Rushton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-08       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  10 in total

1.  A Bayesian model of lightness perception that incorporates spatial variation in the illumination.

Authors:  Sarah R Allred; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Evaluation of low-contrast perceptibility in dental restorative materials under the influence of ambient light conditions.

Authors:  A D Cruz; I C Lobo; A L B Lemos; M F Aguiar
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2015-01-28       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  A muscle-activity-dependent gain between motor cortex and EMG.

Authors:  Stephanie Naufel; Joshua I Glaser; Konrad P Kording; Eric J Perreault; Lee E Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Lightness perception in high dynamic range images: local and remote luminance effects.

Authors:  Sarah R Allred; Ana Radonjic; Alan L Gilchrist; David H Brainard
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Abrupt darkening under high dynamic range (HDR) luminance invokes facilitation for high-contrast targets and grouping by luminance similarity.

Authors:  Chou P Hung; Chloe Callahan-Flintoft; Paul D Fedele; Kim F Fluitt; Onyekachi Odoemene; Anthony J Walker; Andre V Harrison; Barry D Vaughan; Matthew S Jaswa; Min Wei
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Lightness induction enhancements and limitations at low frequency modulations across a variety of stimulus contexts.

Authors:  Louis Nicholas Vinke; Arash Yazdanbakhsh
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Controlled bio-inspired self-organised criticality.

Authors:  Tjeerd V Olde Scheper
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Depth effect on lightness revisited: The role of articulation, proximity and fields of illumination.

Authors:  Ana Radonjić; Alan L Gilchrist
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2013-08-14

9.  Scaling measurements of the effect of surface slant on perceived lightness.

Authors:  Sean C Madigan; David H Brainard
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2014-01-28

10.  Perceived contrast on displays with different luminance ranges.

Authors:  Patrik Sund
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 4.506

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.