Hirofumi Tomita1, John Hagaman, Morton H Friedman, Nobuyo Maeda. 1. Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, CB #7525, 701 Brinkhous-Bullitt Building, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7525, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relationships between hemodynamics and differential plaque development at the aortic arch of apolipoprotein E (apoE)-null mice on 129S6/SvEvTac (129) and C57BL/6J (B6) genetic backgrounds. METHODS: Mean flow velocities at the ascending and descending aorta (mVAA and mVDA) were measured by Doppler ultrasound in wild type and apoE-null male mice at 3 and 9 months of age. Following dissection of the aortic arches, anatomical parameters and plaque areas were evaluated. RESULTS: Arch plaques were five times bigger in 129-apoE than in B6-apoE mice at 3 months, and twice as large at 9 months. The geometric differences, namely larger vessel diameter in the B6 strain and broader inner curvature of the aortic arch in the 129 strain, were exaggerated in 9-month-old apoE-null mice. Cardiac output and heart rate under anesthesia were significantly higher in the B6 strain than in the 129 strain. The values of mVAA were similar in the two strains, while mVDA was lower in the 129 strain. However, there was a 129-apoE-specific reduction of flow velocities with age, and both mVAA and mVDA were significantly lower in 129-apoE than in B6-apoE mice at 9 months. The mean relative wall shear stress (rWSS) over the aortic arch in 129-apoE and B6-apoE mice were not different, but animals with lower mean rWSS had larger arch plaques within each strain. CONCLUSIONS: The plaque formation in the arch of apoE-null mice is accompanied by strain-dependent changes in both arch geometry and hemodynamics. While arch plaque sizes negatively correlate with mean rWSS, additional factors are necessary to account for the strain differences in arch plaque development.
OBJECTIVE: We investigated the relationships between hemodynamics and differential plaque development at the aortic arch of apolipoprotein E (apoE)-null mice on 129S6/SvEvTac (129) and C57BL/6J (B6) genetic backgrounds. METHODS: Mean flow velocities at the ascending and descending aorta (mVAA and mVDA) were measured by Doppler ultrasound in wild type and apoE-null male mice at 3 and 9 months of age. Following dissection of the aortic arches, anatomical parameters and plaque areas were evaluated. RESULTS: Arch plaques were five times bigger in 129-apoE than in B6-apoEmice at 3 months, and twice as large at 9 months. The geometric differences, namely larger vessel diameter in the B6 strain and broader inner curvature of the aortic arch in the 129 strain, were exaggerated in 9-month-old apoE-null mice. Cardiac output and heart rate under anesthesia were significantly higher in the B6 strain than in the 129 strain. The values of mVAA were similar in the two strains, while mVDA was lower in the 129 strain. However, there was a 129-apoE-specific reduction of flow velocities with age, and both mVAA and mVDA were significantly lower in 129-apoE than in B6-apoEmice at 9 months. The mean relative wall shear stress (rWSS) over the aortic arch in 129-apoE and B6-apoEmice were not different, but animals with lower mean rWSS had larger arch plaques within each strain. CONCLUSIONS: The plaque formation in the arch of apoE-null mice is accompanied by strain-dependent changes in both arch geometry and hemodynamics. While arch plaque sizes negatively correlate with mean rWSS, additional factors are necessary to account for the strain differences in arch plaque development.
Authors: Michael J Ryan; Sean P Didion; Deborah R Davis; Frank M Faraci; Curt D Sigmund Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2002-01 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: C J Hartley; A K Reddy; S Madala; B Martin-McNulty; R Vergona; M E Sullivan; M Halks-Miller; G E Taffet; L H Michael; M L Entman; Y X Wang Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2000-11 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Yu-Qing Zhou; F Stuart Foster; Brian J Nieman; Lorinda Davidson; X Josette Chen; R Mark Henkelman Journal: Physiol Genomics Date: 2004-07-08 Impact factor: 3.107
Authors: Elisabet Domínguez; Jesús Ruberte; José Ríos; Rosa Novellas; Maria Montserrat Rivera Del Alamo; Marc Navarro; Yvonne Espada Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2014-05-23 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Andrea Acuna; Alycia G Berman; Frederick W Damen; Brett A Meyers; Amelia R Adelsperger; Kelsey C Bayer; Melissa C Brindise; Brittani Bungart; Alexander M Kiel; Rachel A Morrison; Joseph C Muskat; Kelsey M Wasilczuk; Yi Wen; Jiacheng Zhang; Patrick Zito; Craig J Goergen Journal: J Biomech Eng Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 2.097
Authors: Christoph Koentges; Mark E Pepin; Carolyn Müsse; Katharina Pfeil; Sonia V Viteri Alvarez; Natalie Hoppe; Michael M Hoffmann; Katja E Odening; Samuel Sossalla; Andreas Zirlik; Lutz Hein; Christoph Bode; Adam R Wende; Heiko Bugger Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2017-12-29 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Mark A Van Doormaal; Asimina Kazakidi; Marzena Wylezinska; Anthony Hunt; Jordi L Tremoleda; Andrea Protti; Yvette Bohraus; Willy Gsell; Peter D Weinberg; C Ross Ethier Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2012-07-04 Impact factor: 4.118
Authors: Suvi E Heinonen; Guillem Genové; Eva Bengtsson; Thomas Hübschle; Lina Åkesson; Katrin Hiss; Agnes Benardeau; Seppo Ylä-Herttuala; Ann-Cathrine Jönsson-Rylander; Maria F Gomez Journal: J Diabetes Res Date: 2015-02-15 Impact factor: 4.011
Authors: John M S Wait; Hirofumi Tomita; Laurel M Burk; Jianping Lu; Otto Z Zhou; Nobuyo Maeda; Yueh Z Lee Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2013-02-22 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Bart Spronck; Marcos Latorre; Mo Wang; Sameet Mehta; Alexander W Caulk; Pengwei Ren; Abhay B Ramachandra; Sae-Il Murtada; Alexia Rojas; Chang-Shun He; Bo Jiang; Matthew R Bersi; George Tellides; Jay D Humphrey Journal: J R Soc Interface Date: 2021-07-28 Impact factor: 4.293