Literature DB >> 22078004

Correlation between anterior cruciate ligament graft obliquity and tibial rotation during dynamic pivoting activities in patients with anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo examination.

Franceska Zampeli1, Aikaterini Ntoulia, Dimitrios Giotis, Vasileios A Tsiaras, Maria Argyropoulou, Evangelos Pappas, Anastasios D Georgoulis.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of coronal- and sagittal-plane anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft obliquity on tibial rotation (TR) range of motion (ROM) during dynamic pivoting activities after ACL reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft.
METHODS: We evaluated 19 ACL-reconstructed patients (mean age, 29 years; age range, 18 to 38 years; mean time interval postoperatively, 19.9 months) and 19 matched control subjects (mean age, 30.6 years; age range, 24 to 37 years) using motion analysis during (1) descending a stairway and pivoting and (2) landing from a jump and pivoting. Magnetic resonance imaging was used to measure the coronal and sagittal ACL graft angle. The dependent variables were TR ROM during pivoting and the side-to-side difference (SSD) in TR ROM between the reconstructed knee and the contralateral intact knee.
RESULTS: TR ROM of the ACL-reconstructed knee was significantly increased compared with both the contralateral intact knee and the healthy control knee (P < .05). A significant positive correlation was observed between TR ROM and coronal ACL graft angle (r = 0.727, P = .0006 for descending and pivoting; r = 0.795, P = .0001 for landing and pivoting) as well as between SSD of TR ROM and coronal ACL graft angle (r = 0.789, P < .0001 for descending and pivoting; r = 0.799, P < .0001 for landing and pivoting). No correlation was found with the sagittal ACL graft angle.
CONCLUSIONS: After ACL reconstruction with a BPTB graft, patients' knees showed higher TR values than their uninjured knees and the knees of uninjured control volunteers during dynamic pivoting activities. The findings of this study show that TR was better restored in ACL-reconstructed patients with a more oblique graft in the coronal plane. A similar relation was not observed for graft orientation in the sagittal plane. Although these data do not imply a cause-and-effect relation between the 2 variables, they may indicate that a more oblique placement of a single BPTB ACL graft in the coronal plane is correlated with better control of TR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.
Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22078004     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.08.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  12 in total

1.  Kinematic predictors of subjective outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo motion analysis study.

Authors:  Franceska Zampeli; Evangelos Pappas; Dimitrios Giotis; Michael E Hantes; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  American Society of Biomechanics Clinical Biomechanics Award 2017: Non-anatomic graft geometry is linked with asymmetric tibiofemoral kinematics and cartilage contact following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Michael F Vignos; Jarred M Kaiser; Geoffrey S Baer; Richard Kijowski; Darryl G Thelen
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-05-10       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  A Surgical Technique for Posterolateral Placement of Interference Screw Accurately in Tibial Tunnel in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Prashant Parate; Bancha Chernchujit
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2016-12-26

4.  The effect of anterior cruciate ligament graft orientation on rotational knee kinematics.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Scott Wotherspoon; Julian A Feller; Jodie A McClelland
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Lessons learned from the last 20 years of ACL-related in vivo-biomechanics research of the knee joint.

Authors:  Evangelos Pappas; Franceska Zampeli; Sofia A Xergia; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  The posterior horn of the lateral meniscus is a reliable novel landmark for femoral tunnel placement in ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Andreas Weiler; Michael Wagner; Christoph Kittl
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  Does the position of interference screw in tibial tunnel effect anatomic orientation in single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

Authors:  Bancha Chernchujit; Sumit Agrawal; Bordee Sukhapradit
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2020-07-16

8.  Short-term functional and clinical outcomes after ACL reconstruction with hamstrings autograft: transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique.

Authors:  Georgios Koutras; Pericles Papadopoulos; Ioannis P Terzidis; Ioannis Gigis; Evangelos Pappas
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Restoring tibiofemoral alignment during ACL reconstruction results in better knee biomechanics.

Authors:  Frantzeska Zampeli; Ioannis Terzidis; João Espregueira-Mendes; Jim-Dimitris Georgoulis; Manfred Bernard; Evangelos Pappas; Anastasios D Georgoulis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Femoral Aperture Fixation Improves Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Function When Added to Cortical Suspensory Fixation: An In Vivo Computer Navigation Study.

Authors:  Mark D Porter; Bruce Shadbolt
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2016-09-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.