BACKGROUND: Computational finite element models of the aortic root have previously used material properties of the ascending aorta to describe both aortic sinuses and ascending aorta. We have previously demonstrated significant material property differences between ascending aorta and sinuses in pigs. However, it is unknown whether these regional material property differences exist in humans. The main objective of this study was to investigate biomechanics of fresh human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses and compare nonlinear material properties of these regions. METHODS: Fresh human aortic root specimens obtained from the California Transplant Donor Network (Oakland, CA) were subjected to displacement-controlled equibiaxial stretch testing within 24 hours of harvest. Stress-strain data recorded were used to derive strain energy functions for each region. Tissue behavior was quantified by tissue stiffness and a direct comparison was made between different regions of aortic root at physiologic stress levels. RESULTS: All regions demonstrated a nonlinear response to strain during stretch testing in both circumferential and longitudinal directions. No significant difference in tissue stiffness was found between anterior and posterior regions of the ascending aorta or among the three sinuses in both directions. However, our results demonstrated that human ascending aorta is significantly more compliant than aortic sinuses in both circumferential and longitudinal directions within the physiologic stress range. CONCLUSIONS: Significant material and structural differences were observed between human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses. Regionally specific material properties should be employed in computational models used to assess treatments of structural aortic root disease.
BACKGROUND: Computational finite element models of the aortic root have previously used material properties of the ascending aorta to describe both aortic sinuses and ascending aorta. We have previously demonstrated significant material property differences between ascending aorta and sinuses in pigs. However, it is unknown whether these regional material property differences exist in humans. The main objective of this study was to investigate biomechanics of fresh human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses and compare nonlinear material properties of these regions. METHODS: Fresh human aortic root specimens obtained from the California Transplant Donor Network (Oakland, CA) were subjected to displacement-controlled equibiaxial stretch testing within 24 hours of harvest. Stress-strain data recorded were used to derive strain energy functions for each region. Tissue behavior was quantified by tissue stiffness and a direct comparison was made between different regions of aortic root at physiologic stress levels. RESULTS: All regions demonstrated a nonlinear response to strain during stretch testing in both circumferential and longitudinal directions. No significant difference in tissue stiffness was found between anterior and posterior regions of the ascending aorta or among the three sinuses in both directions. However, our results demonstrated that human ascending aorta is significantly more compliant than aortic sinuses in both circumferential and longitudinal directions within the physiologic stress range. CONCLUSIONS: Significant material and structural differences were observed between human ascending aorta and aortic sinuses. Regionally specific material properties should be employed in computational models used to assess treatments of structural aortic root disease.
Authors: Luca Sabia; Eleonora Avenatti; Marco Cesareo; Dario Leone; Francesco Tosello; Franco Veglio; Alberto Milan Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Andrew D Wisneski; Aart Mookhoek; Sam Chitsaz; Michael D Hope; Julius M Guccione; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng Journal: J Heart Valve Dis Date: 2014-11
Authors: Hanjay Wang; Andrew Wisneski; Annabel M Imbrie-Moore; Michael J Paulsen; Zhongjie Wang; Yue Xuan; Hector Lopez Hernandez; Camille E Hironaka; Haley J Lucian; Hye Sook Shin; Shreya Anilkumar; Akshara D Thakore; Justin M Farry; Anahita Eskandari; Kiah M Williams; Frederick Grady; Matthew A Wu; Jinsuh Jung; Lyndsay M Stapleton; Amanda N Steele; Yuanjia Zhu; Y Joseph Woo Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Date: 2022-01-04
Authors: Yue Xuan; Danny Dvir; Andrew D Wisneski; Zhongjie Wang; Jian Ye; Julius M Guccione; Liang Ge; Elaine E Tseng Journal: AsiaIntervention Date: 2020-12
Authors: Hanjay Wang; Andrew Wisneski; Michael J Paulsen; Annabel Imbrie-Moore; Zhongjie Wang; Yue Xuan; Hector Lopez Hernandez; Haley J Lucian; Anahita Eskandari; Akshara D Thakore; Justin M Farry; Camille E Hironaka; Daniel von Bornstaedt; Amanda N Steele; Lyndsay M Stapleton; Kiah M Williams; Matthew A Wu; John W MacArthur; Y Joseph Woo Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Date: 2019-04-17