| Literature DB >> 22072583 |
Holger Engel1, Jung Ju Huang, Chung Kan Tsao, Chia-Yu Lin, Pan-Yu Chou, Eric M Brey, Steven L Henry, Ming Huei Cheng.
Abstract
This prospective study was designed to compare the accuracy rate between remote smartphone photographic assessments and in-person examinations for free flap monitoring. One hundred and three consecutive free flaps were monitored with in-person examinations and assessed remotely by three surgeons (Team A) via photographs transmitted over smartphone. Four other surgeons used the traditional in-person examinations as Team B. The response time to re-exploration was defined as the interval between when a flap was evaluated as compromised by the nurse/house officer and when the decision was made for re-exploration. The accuracy rate was 98.7% and 94.2% for in-person and smartphone photographic assessments, respectively. The response time of 8 ± 3 min in Team A was statistically shorter than the 180 ± 104 min in Team B (P = 0.01 by the Mann-Whitney test). The remote smartphone photography assessment has a comparable accuracy rate and shorter response time compared with in-person examination for free flap monitoring.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22072583 DOI: 10.1002/micr.20921
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microsurgery ISSN: 0738-1085 Impact factor: 2.425