Literature DB >> 22071914

Optimal positioning for emergent needle thoracostomy: a cadaver-based study.

Kenji Inaba1, Bernardino C Branco, Marc Eckstein, David V Shatz, Matthew J Martin, Donald J Green, Thomas T Noguchi, Demetrios Demetriades.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Needle thoracostomy is an emergent procedure designed to relieve tension pneumothorax. High failure rates because of the needle not penetrating into the thoracic cavity have been reported. Advanced Trauma Life Support guidelines recommend placement in the second intercostal space, midclavicular line using a 5-cm needle. The purpose of this study was to evaluate placement in the fifth intercostal space, midaxillary line, where tube thoracostomy is routinely performed. We hypothesized that this would result in a higher successful placement rate.
METHODS: Twenty randomly selected unpreserved adult cadavers were evaluated. A standard 14-gauge 5-cm needle was placed in both the fifth intercostal space at the midaxillary line and the traditional second intercostal space at the midclavicular line in both the right and left chest walls. The needles were secured and thoracotomy was then performed to assess penetration into the pleural cavity. The right and left sides were analyzed separately acting as their own controls for a total of 80 needles inserted into 20 cadavers. The thickness of the chest wall at the site of penetration was then measured for each entry position.
RESULTS: A total of 14 male and 6 female cadavers were studied. Overall, 100% (40 of 40) of needles placed in the fifth intercostal space and 57.5% (23 of 40) of the needles placed in the second intercostal space entered the chest cavity (p < 0.001); right chest: 100% versus 60.0% (p = 0.003) and left chest: 100% versus 55.0% (p = 0.001). Overall, the thickness of the chest wall was 3.5 cm ± 0.9 cm at the fifth intercostal space and 4.5 cm ± 1.1 cm at the second intercostal space (p < 0.001). Both right and left chest wall thicknesses were similar (right, 3.6 cm ± 1.0 cm vs. 4.5 cm ± 1.1 cm, p = 0.007; left, 3.5 ± 0.9 cm vs. 4.4 cm ± 1.1 cm, p = 0.008).
CONCLUSIONS: In a cadaveric model, needle thoracostomy was successfully placed in 100% of attempts at the fifth intercostal space but in only 58% at the traditional second intercostal position. On average, the chest wall was 1 cm thinner at this position and may improve successful needle placement. Live patient validation of these results is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22071914     DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31822d9618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Trauma        ISSN: 0022-5282


  11 in total

Review 1.  Chest wall thickness and decompression failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anatomic locations in needle thoracostomy.

Authors:  Danuel V Laan; Trang Diem N Vu; Cornelius A Thiels; T K Pandian; Henry J Schiller; M Hassan Murad; Johnathon M Aho
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2015-12-13       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Needle thoracostomy for tension pneumothorax: the Israeli Defense Forces experience.

Authors:  Jacob Chen; Roy Nadler; Dagan Schwartz; Homer Tien; Andrew P Cap; Elon Glassberg
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.089

3.  Needle Decompression of Tension Pneumothorax with Colorimetric Capnography.

Authors:  Nimesh D Naik; Matthew C Hernandez; Jeff R Anderson; Erika K Ross; Martin D Zielinski; Johnathon M Aho
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 9.410

4.  Year in review 2011: respiratory infections, tuberculosis, pleural diseases, bronchoscopic intervention and imaging.

Authors:  José M Porcel; Chi Chiu Leung; Marcos I Restrepo; Pyng Lee
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.424

5.  Post-mortem computed tomography assessment of medical support device position following fatal trauma: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Lindsay Hofer; Brendan Corcoran; Andrew L Drahos; Jeremy H Levin; Scott D Steenburg
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2022-06-28

6.  Do mannequin chests provide an accurate representation of a human chest for simulated decompression of tension pneumothoraxes?

Authors:  Malcolm J Boyle; Brett Williams; Simon Dousek
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2012

7.  Needle thoracostomy: Clinical effectiveness is improved using a longer angiocatheter.

Authors:  Johnathon M Aho; Cornelius A Thiels; Moustafa M El Khatib; Daniel S Ubl; Danuel V Laan; Kathleen S Berns; Elizabeth B Habermann; Scott P Zietlow; Martin D Zielinski
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.313

8.  Complications of needle thoracostomy: A comprehensive clinical review.

Authors:  Brian Wernick; Heidi H Hon; Ronnie N Mubang; Anthony Cipriano; Ronson Hughes; Demicha D Rankin; David C Evans; William R Burfeind; Brian A Hoey; James Cipolla; Sagar C Galwankar; Thomas J Papadimos; Stanislaw P Stawicki; Michael S Firstenberg
Journal:  Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

Review 9.  Optimizing Care for Trauma Patients with Obesity.

Authors:  Sanjiv Gray; Beatrice Dieudonne
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-07-22

10.  Risk Values of Weight and Body Mass Index for Chest Wall Thickness in Patients Requiring Needle Thoracostomy Decompression.

Authors:  Chia-Hung Hsu; Tzu-Yin Lin; Ju-Chi Ou; Jiann Ruey Ong; Hon-Ping Ma
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 1.112

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.