Literature DB >> 22071780

Exhaled breath analysis with a colorimetric sensor array for the identification and characterization of lung cancer.

Peter J Mazzone1, Xiao-Feng Wang, Yaomin Xu, Tarek Mekhail, Mary C Beukemann, Jie Na, Jonathan W Kemling, Kenneth S Suslick, Madhu Sasidhar.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The pattern of exhaled breath volatile organic compounds represents a metabolic biosignature with the potential to identify and characterize lung cancer. Breath biosignature-based classification of homogeneous subgroups of lung cancer may be more accurate than a global breath signature. Combining breath biosignatures with clinical risk factors may improve the accuracy of the signature.
OBJECTIVES: To develop an exhaled breath biosignature of lung cancer using a colorimetric sensor array and to determine the accuracy of breath biosignatures of lung cancer characteristics with and without the inclusion of clinical risk factors.
METHODS: The exhaled breath of 229 study subjects, 92 with lung cancer and 137 controls, was drawn across a colorimetric sensor array. Logistic prediction models were developed and statistically validated based on the color changes of the sensor. Age, sex, smoking history, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were incorporated in the prediction models.
RESULTS: The validated prediction model of the combined breath and clinical biosignature was moderately accurate at distinguishing lung cancer from control subjects (C-statistic 0.811). The accuracy improved when the model focused on only one histology (C-statistic 0.825-0.890). Individuals with different histologies could be accurately distinguished from one another (C-statistic 0.864 for adenocarcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma). Moderate accuracies were noted for validated breath biosignatures of stage and survival (C-statistic 0.785 and 0.693, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: A colorimetric sensor array is capable of identifying exhaled breath biosignatures of lung cancer. The accuracy of breath biosignatures can be optimized by evaluating specific histologies and incorporating clinical risk factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22071780      PMCID: PMC3241851          DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318233d80f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  37 in total

1.  Detection of lung cancer by sensor array analyses of exhaled breath.

Authors:  Roberto F Machado; Daniel Laskowski; Olivia Deffenderfer; Timothy Burch; Shuo Zheng; Peter J Mazzone; Tarek Mekhail; Constance Jennings; James K Stoller; Jacqueline Pyle; Jennifer Duncan; Raed A Dweik; Serpil C Erzurum
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  TD-GC-MS analysis of volatile metabolites of human lung cancer and normal cells in vitro.

Authors:  Wojciech Filipiak; Andreas Sponring; Anna Filipiak; Clemens Ager; Jochen Schubert; Wolfram Miekisch; Anton Amann; Jakob Troppmair
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Integrated ionization approach for RRLC-MS/MS-based metabonomics: finding potential biomarkers for lung cancer.

Authors:  Zhuoling An; Yanhua Chen; Ruiping Zhang; Yongmei Song; Jianghao Sun; Jiuming He; Jinfa Bai; Lijia Dong; Qimin Zhan; Zeper Abliz
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-08-06       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Noninvasive detection of lung cancer by analysis of exhaled breath.

Authors:  Amel Bajtarevic; Clemens Ager; Martin Pienz; Martin Klieber; Konrad Schwarz; Magdalena Ligor; Tomasz Ligor; Wojciech Filipiak; Hubert Denz; Michael Fiegl; Wolfgang Hilbe; Wolfgang Weiss; Peter Lukas; Herbert Jamnig; Martin Hackl; Alfred Haidenberger; Bogusław Buszewski; Wolfram Miekisch; Jochen Schubert; Anton Amann
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-29       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  An optoelectronic nose for the detection of toxic gases.

Authors:  Sung H Lim; Liang Feng; Jonathan W Kemling; Christopher J Musto; Kenneth S Suslick
Journal:  Nat Chem       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 24.427

6.  Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti; Purvish Parikh; Joachim von Pawel; Bonne Biesma; Johan Vansteenkiste; Christian Manegold; Piotr Serwatowski; Ulrich Gatzemeier; Raghunadharao Digumarti; Mauro Zukin; Jin S Lee; Anders Mellemgaard; Keunchil Park; Shehkar Patil; Janusz Rolski; Tuncay Goksel; Filippo de Marinis; Lorinda Simms; Katherine P Sugarman; David Gandara
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Prediction of lung cancer using volatile biomarkers in breath.

Authors:  Michael Phillips; Nasser Altorki; John H M Austin; Robert B Cameron; Renee N Cataneo; Joel Greenberg; Robert Kloss; Roger A Maxfield; Muhammad I Munawar; Harvey I Pass; Asif Rashid; William N Rom; Peter Schmitt
Journal:  Cancer Biomark       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.388

8.  Diagnosing lung cancer in exhaled breath using gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Gang Peng; Ulrike Tisch; Orna Adams; Meggie Hakim; Nisrean Shehada; Yoav Y Broza; Salem Billan; Roxolyana Abdah-Bortnyak; Abraham Kuten; Hossam Haick
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2009-08-30       Impact factor: 39.213

9.  Ion mobility spectrometry for the detection of volatile organic compounds in exhaled breath of patients with lung cancer: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  M Westhoff; P Litterst; L Freitag; W Urfer; S Bader; J-I Baumbach
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Comparison of squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the lung by metabolomic analysis of tissue-serum pairs.

Authors:  K W Jordan; C B Adkins; L Su; E F Halpern; E J Mark; D C Christiani; L L Cheng
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 5.705

View more
  44 in total

Review 1.  The Pursuit of Noninvasive Diagnosis of Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Thomas Atwater; Christine M Cook; Pierre P Massion
Journal:  Semin Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.119

Review 2.  Pattern recognition for predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine in cancer.

Authors:  Tingting Cheng; Xianquan Zhan
Journal:  EPMA J       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.543

3.  Biomimetic Cross-Reactive Sensor Arrays: Prospects in Biodiagnostics.

Authors:  J E Fitzgerald; H Fenniri
Journal:  RSC Adv       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 3.361

4.  A Novel Framework with High Diagnostic Sensitivity for Lung Cancer Detection by Electronic Nose.

Authors:  Binchun Lu; Lidan Fu; Bo Nie; Zhiyun Peng; Hongying Liu
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

5.  A DNA based visual and colorimetric aggregation assay for the early growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation by using unmodified gold nanoparticles.

Authors:  Santheraleka Ramanathan; Subash C B Gopinath; M K Md Arshad; Prabakaran Poopalan; Periasamy Anbu
Journal:  Mikrochim Acta       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 5.833

6.  Progress in the development of volatile exhaled breath signatures of lung cancer.

Authors:  Peter J Mazzone; Xiao-Feng Wang; Sung Lim; James Jett; Humberto Choi; Qi Zhang; Mary Beukemann; Meredith Seeley; Ray Martino; Paul Rhodes
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-05

7.  Physician Assessment of Pretest Probability of Malignancy and Adherence With Guidelines for Pulmonary Nodule Evaluation.

Authors:  Nichole T Tanner; Alexander Porter; Michael K Gould; Xiao-Jun Li; Anil Vachani; Gerard A Silvestri
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2017-01-20       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Identification of pathogenic fungi with an optoelectronic nose.

Authors:  Yinan Zhang; Jon R Askim; Wenxuan Zhong; Peter Orlean; Kenneth S Suslick
Journal:  Analyst       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 4.616

Review 9.  Exhaled breath analysis for lung cancer.

Authors:  Annette G Dent; Tom G Sutedja; Paul V Zimmerman
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.895

10.  Selectivity and Specificity: Pros and Cons in Sensing.

Authors:  William J Peveler; Mahdieh Yazdani; Vincent M Rotello
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2016-09-30       Impact factor: 7.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.