Literature DB >> 12742613

Sociodemographics, self-rated health, and mortality in the US.

Peter Franks1, Marthe R Gold, Kevin Fiscella.   

Abstract

Using data from the 1987 National Medical Expenditure Survey, a representative sample of US civilians, and their 5-year mortality, we examined the adjusted relationships among baseline self-reported health, derived from SF-20 subscales (health perceptions, physical function, role function and mental health) and sociodemographics (age, sex, race/ethnicity, income and education) and subsequent mortality. Included were 21,363 persons aged 21 and over, with complete follow-up on 19,812. Physical function showed the greatest decline with age, whereas mental health increased slightly. Women reported lower health for all scales except role function. Greater income was associated with better health, least marked for mental health. Greater education was associated with better health, most marked for health perceptions. Compared with whites, blacks reported lower health, whereas Latinos reported higher health. Lower self-reported health predicted increased adjusted mortality. After adjustment for baseline self-rated health, the relationships between income and education and mortality were greatly attenuated, whereas the relationships between age, gender, race/ethnicity and mortality were not. Self-rated health exhibited more profound relationships with mortality in younger persons, those with more education, and whites. In conclusion, lower socioeconomic status (SES), and being black are associated with lower reported health status and higher mortality; women report lower health status but exhibit lower mortality; and Latinos report higher health status and exhibit lower mortality. The effects of SES on mortality are largely explained by their associations with self-rated health, whereas, the effects of gender and race/ethnicity on mortality appear to act through independent pathways. Because of these differential sociodemographic relationships caution is urged when using self-rated health measures in research, clinical, and policy settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12742613     DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00281-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  103 in total

1.  Gender, educational and age differences in meanings that underlie global self-rated health.

Authors:  Wim Peersman; Dirk Cambier; Jan De Maeseneer; Sara Willems
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2011-11-10       Impact factor: 3.380

2.  Socioeconomic Status, Financial Strain, and Leukocyte Telomere Length in a Sample of African American Midlife Men.

Authors:  Joshua M Schrock; Nancy E Adler; Elissa S Epel; Amani M Nuru-Jeter; Jue Lin; Elizabeth H Blackburn; Robert Joseph Taylor; David H Chae
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2017-06-20

3.  Relationship among sociodemographic factors, clinical conditions, and health-related quality of life: examining the EQ-5D in the U.S. general population.

Authors:  Erica I Lubetkin; Haomiao Jia; Peter Franks; Marthe R Gold
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.147

4.  Discharges against medical advice: are race/ethnicity predictors?

Authors:  Peter Franks; Sean Meldrum; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  The effect of question order on self-rated general health status in a multilingual survey context.

Authors:  Sunghee Lee; David Grant
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Do stressful events account for the link between socioeconomic status and mental health?

Authors:  M S Businelle; B A Mills; K G Chartier; D E Kendzor; J M Reingle; K Shuval
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 2.341

7.  Health in changing neighborhoods: A study of the relationship between gentrification and self-rated health in the state of California.

Authors:  Jacob M Izenberg; Mahasin S Mujahid; Irene H Yen
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.078

8.  Chronic discrimination predicts higher circulating levels of E-selectin in a national sample: the MIDUS study.

Authors:  Elliot M Friedman; David R Williams; Burton H Singer; Carol D Ryff
Journal:  Brain Behav Immun       Date:  2009-01-11       Impact factor: 7.217

9.  The Best Predictors of Survival: Do They Vary by Age, Sex, and Race?

Authors:  Noreen Goldman; Dana A Glei; Maxine Weinstein
Journal:  Popul Dev Rev       Date:  2017-07-17

10.  Comparison of individual-level versus area-level socioeconomic measures in assessing health outcomes of children in Olmsted County, Minnesota.

Authors:  Maria R Pardo-Crespo; Nirmala Priya Narla; Arthur R Williams; Timothy J Beebe; Jeff Sloan; Barbara P Yawn; Philip H Wheeler; Young J Juhn
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.