Sarbani Ghoshal1, Vimala Bondada1, Kathryn E Saatman1, Rodney P Guttmann2, James W Geddes3. 1. Spinal Cord & Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 2. Department of Gerontology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. 3. Spinal Cord & Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA. Electronic address: jgeddes@uky.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The extent and severity of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) can be difficult to determine with current diagnostic methods. To address this, there has been increased interest in developing biomarkers to assist in the diagnosis, determination of injury severity, evaluation of recovery and therapeutic efficacy, and prediction of outcomes. Several promising serum TBI biomarkers have been identified using hypothesis-driven approaches, largely examining proteins that are abundant in neurons and non-neural cells in the CNS. NEW METHOD: An unbiased approach, phage display, was used to identify serum TBI biomarkers. In this proof-of-concept study, mice received a TBI using the controlled cortical impact model of TBI (1mm injury depth, 3.5m/s velocity) and phage display was utilized to identify putative serum biomarkers at 6h postinjury. RESULTS: An engineered phage which preferentially bound to injured serum was sequenced to identify the 12-mer 'recognizer' peptide expressed on the coat protein. Following synthesis of the recognizer peptide, pull down, and mass spectrometry analysis, the target protein was identified as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS AND CONCLUSIONS: GFAP has previously been identified as a promising TBI biomarker. The results provide proof of concept regarding the ability of phage display to identify TBI serum biomarkers. This methodology is currently being applied to serum biomarkers of mild TBI.
BACKGROUND: The extent and severity of traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) can be difficult to determine with current diagnostic methods. To address this, there has been increased interest in developing biomarkers to assist in the diagnosis, determination of injury severity, evaluation of recovery and therapeutic efficacy, and prediction of outcomes. Several promising serum TBI biomarkers have been identified using hypothesis-driven approaches, largely examining proteins that are abundant in neurons and non-neural cells in the CNS. NEW METHOD: An unbiased approach, phage display, was used to identify serum TBI biomarkers. In this proof-of-concept study, mice received a TBI using the controlled cortical impact model of TBI (1mm injury depth, 3.5m/s velocity) and phage display was utilized to identify putative serum biomarkers at 6h postinjury. RESULTS: An engineered phage which preferentially bound to injured serum was sequenced to identify the 12-mer 'recognizer' peptide expressed on the coat protein. Following synthesis of the recognizer peptide, pull down, and mass spectrometry analysis, the target protein was identified as glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP). COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS AND CONCLUSIONS:GFAP has previously been identified as a promising TBI biomarker. The results provide proof of concept regarding the ability of phage display to identify TBI serum biomarkers. This methodology is currently being applied to serum biomarkers of mild TBI.
Authors: Kevin K W Wang; Andrew K Ottens; Ming Cheng Liu; Stephen B Lewis; Colleen Meegan; Monika W Oli; Frank C Tortella; Ronald L Hayes Journal: Expert Rev Proteomics Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 3.940
Authors: D H Smith; H D Soares; J S Pierce; K G Perlman; K E Saatman; D F Meaney; C E Dixon; T K McIntosh Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Camilla Lööv; Ganna Shevchenko; Aishwarya Geeyarpuram Nadadhur; Fredrik Clausen; Lars Hillered; Magnus Wetterhall; Anna Erlandsson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Briana I Martinez; Gergey Alzaem Mousa; Kiera Fleck; Tara MacCulloch; Chris W Diehnelt; Nicholas Stephanopoulos; Sarah E Stabenfeldt Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2022-07-22 Impact factor: 14.957