Literature DB >> 22070335

The association of wall mechanics and morphology: a case study of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth.

Christopher B Washington1, Judy Shum, Satish C Muluk, Ender A Finol.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the potential correlation between peak wall stress (PWS) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) morphology and how it relates to aneurysm rupture potential. Using in-house segmentation and meshing software, six 3-dimensional (3D) AAA models from a single patient followed for 28 months were generated for finite element analysis. For the AAA wall, both isotropic and anisotropic materials were used, while an isotropic material was used for the intraluminal thrombus (ILT). These models were also used to calculate 36 geometric indices characteristic of the aneurysm morphology. Using least squares regression, seven significant geometric features (p < 0.05) were found to characterize the AAA morphology during the surveillance period. By means of nonlinear regression, PWS estimated with the anisotropic material was found to be highly correlated with three of these features: maximum diameter (r = 0.992, p = 0.002), sac volume (r = 0.989, p = 0.003) and diameter to diameter ratio (r = 0.947, p = 0.033). The correlation of wall mechanics with geometry is nonlinear and reveals that PWS does not increase concomitantly with aneurysm diameter. This suggests that a quantitative characterization of AAA morphology may be advantageous in assessing rupture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22070335      PMCID: PMC3705789          DOI: 10.1115/1.4005176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech Eng        ISSN: 0148-0731            Impact factor:   2.097


  21 in total

1.  Toward a biomechanical tool to evaluate rupture potential of abdominal aortic aneurysm: identification of a finite strain constitutive model and evaluation of its applicability.

Authors:  M L Raghavan; D A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  In vivo analysis of mechanical wall stress and abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture risk.

Authors:  Mark F Fillinger; M L Raghavan; Steven P Marra; Jack L Cronenwett; Francis E Kennedy
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Quantitative assessment of abdominal aortic aneurysm geometry.

Authors:  Judy Shum; Giampaolo Martufi; Elena Di Martino; Christopher B Washington; Joseph Grisafi; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2010-10-02       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  A planar biaxial constitutive relation for the luminal layer of intra-luminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Jonathan P Vande Geest; Michael S Sacks; David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Possible objectification of a critical maximum diameter for elective surgery in abdominal aortic aneurysms based on one- and three-dimensional ratios.

Authors:  W A Cappeller; H Engelmann; S Blechschmidt; M Wild; L Lauterjung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 1.888

6.  Towards a noninvasive method for determination of patient-specific wall strength distribution in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Jonathan P Vande Geest; David H J Wang; Stephen R Wisniewski; Michel S Makaroun; David A Vorp
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2006-06-20       Impact factor: 3.934

7.  Prediction of rupture risk in abdominal aortic aneurysm during observation: wall stress versus diameter.

Authors:  Mark F Fillinger; Steven P Marra; M L Raghavan; Francis E Kennedy
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  A comparative study of aortic wall stress using finite element analysis for ruptured and non-ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  A K Venkatasubramaniam; M J Fagan; T Mehta; K J Mylankal; B Ray; G Kuhan; I C Chetter; P T McCollum
Journal:  Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 7.069

9.  Flow-induced wall shear stress in abdominal aortic aneurysms: Part I--steady flow hemodynamics.

Authors:  Ender A Finol; Cristina H Amon
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.763

10.  Fluid-structure interaction in abdominal aortic aneurysms: effects of asymmetry and wall thickness.

Authors:  Christine M Scotti; Alexander D Shkolnik; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 2.819

View more
  3 in total

1.  Progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm towards rupture: refining clinical risk assessment using a fully coupled fluid-structure interaction method.

Authors:  Michalis Xenos; Nicos Labropoulos; Suraj Rambhia; Yared Alemu; Shmuel Einav; Apostolos Tassiopoulos; Natzi Sakalihasan; Danny Bluestein
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 3.934

2.  Geometric surrogates of abdominal aortic aneurysm wall mechanics.

Authors:  Jesús Urrutia; Anuradha Roy; Samarth S Raut; Raúl Antón; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 2.242

3.  A Predictive Analysis of Wall Stress in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms Using a Neural Network Model.

Authors:  Balaji Rengarajan; Sourav S Patnaik; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.097

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.