Literature DB >> 16872617

A planar biaxial constitutive relation for the luminal layer of intra-luminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Jonathan P Vande Geest1, Michael S Sacks, David A Vorp.   

Abstract

The rupture risk of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) is thought to be associated with increased levels of wall stress. Finite element analysis (FEA) allows the prediction of wall stresses in a patient-specific, non-invasive manner. We have recently shown that it is important to include the intra-luminal thrombus (ILT), present in approximately 70% of AAA, into FEA simulations of AAA. All FEA simulations to date assume an isotropic, homogeneous material behavior for this material. The purpose of this work was to investigate the multi-axial biomechanical behavior of ILT and to derive an appropriate constitutive relation. We performed planar biaxial testing on the luminal layer of nine ILT specimens obtained fresh in the operating room (9 patients, mean age 71+/-4.5 years, mean diameter 5.9+/-0.4 cm), and a constitutive relation was derived from this data. Peak stretch and maximum tangential modulus (MTM) values were recorded for the equibiaxial protocol in both the circumferential (theta) and longitudinal (L) directions. Stress contour plots were used to investigate the presence of mechanical anisotropy, after which an appropriate strain energy function was fit to each of the specimen datasets. The peak stretch values for the luminal layer of the ILT were (mean+/-SEM) 1.18+/-0.02 and 1.13+/-0.02 in the theta and L directions, respectively (p=0.14). The MTM values were 20+/-2 and 23+/-3N/cm(2) in the theta and L directions, respectively (p=0.37). From these results and our observation of the symmetry of the stress contour plots for each specimen, we concluded that the use of an isotropic strain energy function for ILT is appropriate. Each specimen data set was then fit to a second-order polynomial strain energy function of the first invariant of the left Cauchy-Green strain tensor, resulting in an accurate fit (average R(2)=0.92+/-0.02; range 0.80-0.99). Comparison of our previously reported, uniaxially derived constitutive relation with the biaxially derived relation derived here shows large differences in the predicted mechanical response, underscoring the importance of the appropriate experimental methods used to derive constitutive relations. Further work is merited in an effort to produce more accurate predictions of wall stresses in patient-specific AAA, and viscoelastic behaviors of the ILT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16872617     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2006.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  29 in total

1.  The association of wall mechanics and morphology: a case study of abdominal aortic aneurysm growth.

Authors:  Christopher B Washington; Judy Shum; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.097

Review 2.  Biomechanics of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  David A Vorp
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Compressive mechanical properties of the intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms and fibrin-based thrombus mimics.

Authors:  John H Ashton; Jonathan P Vande Geest; Bruce R Simon; Darren G Haskett
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 2.712

4.  Biomechanics of porcine renal arteries and role of axial stretch.

Authors:  Stéphane Avril; Pierre Badel; Mohamed Gabr; Michael A Sutton; Susan M Lessner
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.097

5.  Fluid-structure interaction modeling of abdominal aortic aneurysms: the impact of patient-specific inflow conditions and fluid/solid coupling.

Authors:  Santanu Chandra; Samarth S Raut; Anirban Jana; Robert W Biederman; Mark Doyle; Satish C Muluk; Ender A Finol
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 2.097

6.  An experimental and numerical comparison of the rupture locations of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Barry J Doyle; Timothy J Corbett; Anthony Callanan; Michael T Walsh; David A Vorp; Timothy M McGloughlin
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.487

7.  Potential biomechanical roles of risk factors in the evolution of thrombus-laden abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Lana Virag; John S Wilson; Jay D Humphrey; Igor Karšaj
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 8.  Biomechanical phenotyping of central arteries in health and disease: advantages of and methods for murine models.

Authors:  J Ferruzzi; M R Bersi; J D Humphrey
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.934

Review 9.  Biomechanical Rupture Risk Assessment: A Consistent and Objective Decision-Making Tool for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Patients.

Authors:  T Christian Gasser
Journal:  Aorta (Stamford)       Date:  2016-04-01

Review 10.  Biochemomechanics of intraluminal thrombus in abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  J S Wilson; L Virag; P Di Achille; I Karsaj; J D Humphrey
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.