Literature DB >> 22070196

Visual performance with simultaneous vision multifocal contact lenses.

Almudena Llorente-Guillemot1, Santiago García-Lazaro, Teresa Ferrer-Blasco, Rafael J Perez-Cambrodi, Alejandro Cerviño.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim was to assess visual performance after PureVision high addition multifocal contact lens (PM) fitting through contrast sensitivity measured under different illumination levels for both distance and near.
METHODS: In a cross-over study, 20 presbyopic patients were randomly assigned to PM or spectacles. Near contrast sensitivity was measured with the Vistech VCTS 6500 system. Distance contrast sensitivity and distance visual acuity (VA) were measured with the Functional Vision Analyser under photopic (85 cd/m(2) ) and mesopic (3.0 cd/m(2) ) conditions, the latter also under two levels of induced glare: 1.0 lux and 28 lux. Near VA was measured by logMAR charts under approximately 80 cd/m(2) luminance settings.
RESULTS: Average monocular spectacle corrected and PM VA were -0.02 ± 0.05 and 0.03 ± 0.05 logMAR for distance photopic, 0.16 ± 0.10 and 0.23 ± 0.07 logMAR for distance mesopic and -0.03 ± 0.05 and 0.05 ± 0.06 logMAR for near photopic, respectively. Average binocular spectacle corrected and PM VA were -0.05 ± 0.07 and -0.01 ± 0.03 logMAR for distance photopic, 0.10 ± 0.06 and 0.18 ± 0.05 logMAR for distance mesopic and -0.08 ± 0.06 and 0.02 ± 0.05 logMAR for near photopic, respectively. Statistically significant differences were found between the contrast sensitivity with the two types of correction for both distance and near, with spectacle correction being better in all cases.
CONCLUSION: PureVision multifocal contact lenses preserve good VA and good visual performance under real-life conditions.
© 2011 The Authors. Clinical and Experimental Optometry © 2011 Optometrists Association Australia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22070196     DOI: 10.1111/j.1444-0938.2011.00666.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Exp Optom        ISSN: 0816-4622            Impact factor:   2.742


  12 in total

1.  Barriers, motivators and enablers for dispensing multifocal contact lenses in Mumbai, India.

Authors:  Nilesh Thite; Ukti Shah; Jasmin Mehta; Janice Jurkus
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-01-04

2.  Evaluation of refractive correction for standard automated perimetry in eyes wearing multifocal contact lenses.

Authors:  Kazunori Hirasawa; Hikaru Ito; Yukari Ohori; Yui Takano; Nobuyuki Shoji
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

3.  Pupil diameter, working distance and illumination during habitual tasks. Implications for simultaneous vision contact lenses for presbyopia.

Authors:  Genís Cardona; Sílvia López
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2015-10-09

4.  Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.

Authors:  Ravi C Bakaraju; Klaus Ehrmann; Arthur Ho
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-06-09

5.  Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 2. Visual performance after 1 week of lens wear.

Authors:  Ravi C Bakaraju; Daniel Tilia; Jennifer Sha; Jennie Diec; Jiyoon Chung; Danny Kho; Shona Delaney; Anna Munro; Varghese Thomas
Journal:  J Optom       Date:  2017-06-12

6.  Power Profiles of Commercial Multifocal Soft Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Eon Kim; Ravi C Bakaraju; Klaus Ehrmann
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 7.  Bifocal and Multifocal Contact Lenses for Presbyopia and Myopia Control.

Authors:  Laura Remón; Pablo Pérez-Merino; Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo; Ana I Amorim-de-Sousa; José M González-Méijome
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 1.909

8.  Vision with different presbyopia corrections simulated with a portable binocular visual simulator.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Daniel Pascual; Susana Marcos; Carlos Dorronsoro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Deterioration of contrast sensitivity in eyes with epiphora due to lacrimal passage obstruction.

Authors:  Kuniharu Tasaki; Sujin Hoshi; Takahiro Hiraoka; Tetsuro Oshika
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Short-term neural adaptation to simultaneous bifocal images.

Authors:  Aiswaryah Radhakrishnan; Carlos Dorronsoro; Lucie Sawides; Susana Marcos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.