Literature DB >> 22068631

Adding to the mix: integrating ELSI into a National Nanoscale Science and Technology Center.

David J Bjornstad1, Amy K Wolfe.   

Abstract

This paper describes issues associated with integrating the study of Ethical, Legal and Social Issues (ELSI) into ongoing scientific and technical research and describes an approach adopted by the authors for their own work with the center for nanophase materials sciences (CNMS) at the Oak Ridge national laboratory (ORNL). Four key questions are considered: (a) What is ELSI and how should it identify and address topics of interest for the CNMS? (b) What advantages accrue to incorporating ELSI into the CNMS? (c) How should the integration of ELSI into the CNMS take place? (d) How should one judge the effectiveness of the activity? We conclude that ELSI research is not a monolithic body of knowledge, but should be adapted to the question at hand. Our approach focuses on junctures in the R&D continuum at which key decisions occur, avoids topics of a purely ethical nature or advocacy, and seeks to gather data in ways that permit testing the validity of generalization. Integrating ELSI into the CNMS allows dealing with topics firmly grounded in science, offers concrete examples of potential downstream applications and provides access to the scientists using the CNMS and their insights and observations. As well, integration provides the opportunity for R&D managers to benefit from ELSI insights and the potential to modify R&D agendas. Successful integration is dependent on the particular ELSI question set that drives the project. In this case questions sought to identify key choices, information of value to scientists, institutional attributes, key attributes of the CNMS culture, and alternatives for communicating results. The opportunity to consult with scientists on ELSI implications is offered, but not promoted. Finally, ELSI effectiveness is judged by observing the use to which research products are put within the CNMS, ORNL, and the community of external scholars.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22068631     DOI: 10.1007/s11948-011-9311-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics        ISSN: 1353-3452            Impact factor:   3.525


  14 in total

1.  Characteristics and classification of nanoparticles: expert Delphi survey.

Authors:  David Berube; Christopher Cummings; Michael Cacciatore; Dietram Scheufele; Jason Kalin
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 5.913

2.  Building nanoliteracy in the university and beyond.

Authors:  Chris Toumey; Davis Baird
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  But is it unique to nanotechnology?: reframing nanoethics.

Authors:  Marion Godman
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.525

Review 4.  Patents and nanomedicine.

Authors:  Raj Bawa
Journal:  Nanomedicine (Lond)       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 5.307

5.  Lab-scale intervention. Science & Society Series on Convergence Research.

Authors:  Daan Schuurbiers; Erik Fisher
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 8.807

6.  Patenting nanotechnology.

Authors:  Mark A Lemley
Journal:  Stanford Law Rev       Date:  2005-11

7.  The coming era of nanomedicine.

Authors:  Fritz Allhoff
Journal:  Am J Bioeth       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 11.229

8.  Of risks and regulations: how leading U.S. nanoscientists form policy stances about nanotechnology.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Corley; Dietram A Scheufele; Qian Hu
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 2.253

9.  Deliberating the risks of nanotechnologies for energy and health applications in the United States and United Kingdom.

Authors:  Nick Pidgeon; Barbara Herr Harthorn; Karl Bryant; Tee Rogers-Hayden
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008-12-07       Impact factor: 39.213

10.  Nanotoxicology: characterizing the scientific literature, 2000-2007.

Authors:  Alexis D Ostrowski; Tyronne Martin; Joseph Conti; Indy Hurt; Barbara Herr Harthorn
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2008-12-28       Impact factor: 2.253

View more
  4 in total

1.  Editorial overview: public science and technology scholars: engaging whom?

Authors:  Erik Fisher
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Nanoethics and the breaching of boundaries: a heuristic for going from encouragement to a fuller integration of ethical, legal and social issues and science : commentary on: "Adding to the mix: integrating ELSI into a National Nanoscale Science and Technology Center".

Authors:  Julio R Tuma
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.525

3.  Nanoethics in a nanolab: ethics via participation.

Authors:  Julio R Tuma
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 3.525

4.  Analyses of Acceptability Judgments Made Toward the Use of Nanocarrier-Based Targeted Drug Delivery: Interviews with Researchers and Research Trainees in the Field of New Technologies.

Authors:  Vanessa Chenel; Patrick Boissy; Jean-Pierre Cloarec; Johane Patenaude
Journal:  Nanoethics       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 0.917

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.