Literature DB >> 22068424

Safety and tolerability of the Easy Vax™ clinical epidermal electroporation system in healthy adults.

Samer S El-Kamary1, Melissa Billington, Stephen Deitz, Elaina Colby, Howard Rhinehart, Yukun Wu, William Blackwelder, Robert Edelman, Albert Lee, Alan King.   

Abstract

DNA vaccines are cost-effective and versatile, though intracellular delivery has been challenging in humans. Alternative delivery modalities such as electroporation have demonstrated improved immune responses, but are painful. In this single-center, double-blind, medical device trial, we evaluated the safety and tolerability of Easy Vax™ dermal electroporation system, alone (without DNA) in healthy adults. Three randomized protocol doses were administered to 10 subjects (80% white, 60% female, mean age: 32.1 years) in each of two areas (total of six doses). Two subjects complained of shooting pain, burning and/or tingling when doses were administered to the forearm region, but not the lateral deltoid regions. Subsequent doses for the remaining eight subjects were restricted to the deltoid regions only. Tolerability pain scores never exceeded 3 of 10 in the 11-Point Pain Rating scale, and 12 of 100 in the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and lower in follow-up evaluations (P < 0.0001), with no significant difference between the three dosing protocols. Electrical properties of the skin, measured automatically by the device, showed no correlation between pain intensity and skin conductance. In conclusion, the Easy Vax™ electroporation device is safe and well tolerated when administered over the lateral deltoid skin regions in healthy volunteers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22068424      PMCID: PMC3255586          DOI: 10.1038/mt.2011.235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther        ISSN: 1525-0016            Impact factor:   11.454


  25 in total

Review 1.  DNA vaccines: immunology, application, and optimization*.

Authors:  S Gurunathan; D M Klinman; R A Seder
Journal:  Annu Rev Immunol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 28.527

Review 2.  Gene vaccines.

Authors:  Indresh K Srivastava; Margaret A Liu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Genetic immunization is a simple method for eliciting an immune response.

Authors:  D C Tang; M DeVit; S A Johnston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1992-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise.

Authors:  S Grant; T Aitchison; E Henderson; J Christie; S Zare; J McMurray; H Dargie
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  DNA electrotransfer into the skin using a combination of one high- and one low-voltage pulse.

Authors:  N Pavselj; V Préat
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2005-09-02       Impact factor: 9.776

Review 6.  Dermal and transdermal drug delivery systems: current and future prospects.

Authors:  Marc B Brown; Gary P Martin; Stuart A Jones; Franklin K Akomeah
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.419

Review 7.  DNA vaccines -- a modern gimmick or a boon to vaccinology?

Authors:  E Manickan; K L Karem; B T Rouse
Journal:  Crit Rev Immunol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data.

Authors:  E K Breivik; G A Björnsson; E Skovlund
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.442

9.  The effect of pulse repetition frequency on the uptake into electropermeabilized cells in vitro with possible applications in electrochemotherapy.

Authors:  G Pucihar; L M Mir; D Miklavcic
Journal:  Bioelectrochemistry       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.373

10.  Skin electroporation: effects on transgene expression, DNA persistence and local tissue environment.

Authors:  Anna-Karin Roos; Fredrik Eriksson; James A Timmons; Josefine Gerhardt; Ulrika Nyman; Lindvi Gudmundsdotter; Andreas Bråve; Britta Wahren; Pavel Pisa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Skin Transfection Patterns and Expression Kinetics of Electroporation-Enhanced Plasmid Delivery Using the CELLECTRA-3P, a Portable Next-Generation Dermal Electroporation Device.

Authors:  Dinah H Amante; Trevor R F Smith; Janess M Mendoza; Katherine Schultheis; Jay R McCoy; Amir S Khan; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Methods       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.396

2.  Tolerability of intramuscular and intradermal delivery by CELLECTRA(®) adaptive constant current electroporation device in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Malissa C Diehl; Jessica C Lee; Stephen E Daniels; Pablo Tebas; Amir S Khan; Mary Giffear; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Mark L Bagarazzi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  A multi-head intradermal electroporation device allows for tailored and increased dose DNA vaccine delivery to the skin.

Authors:  Jay R McCoy; Janess M Mendoza; Kristin W Spik; Catherine Badger; Alan F Gomez; Connie S Schmaljohn; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Acceptability and tolerability of repeated intramuscular electroporation of Multi-antigenic HIV (HIVMAG) DNA vaccine among healthy African participants in a phase 1 randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Juliet Mpendo; Gaudensia Mutua; Annet Nanvubya; Omu Anzala; Julien Nyombayire; Etienne Karita; Len Dally; Drew Hannaman; Matt Price; Patricia E Fast; Frances Priddy; Huub C Gelderblom; Nancy K Hills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  In vivo molecular imaging and histological analysis of changes induced by electric pulses used for plasmid DNA electrotransfer to the skin: a study in a dorsal window chamber in mice.

Authors:  Bostjan Markelc; Elisabeth Bellard; Gregor Sersa; Sandrine Pelofy; Justin Teissie; Andrej Coer; Muriel Golzio; Maja Cemazar
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2012-05-27       Impact factor: 1.843

6.  DNA vaccination strategy targets epidermal dendritic cells, initiating their migration and induction of a host immune response.

Authors:  Trevor Rf Smith; Katherine Schultheis; William B Kiosses; Dinah H Amante; Janess M Mendoza; John C Stone; Jay R McCoy; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.698

7.  Skin rejuvenation with non-invasive pulsed electric fields.

Authors:  Alexander Golberg; Saiqa Khan; Vasily Belov; Kyle P Quinn; Hassan Albadawi; G Felix Broelsch; Michael T Watkins; Irene Georgakoudi; Mikhail Papisov; Martin C Mihm; William G Austen; Martin L Yarmush
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Nanosecond electric pulse effects on gene expression.

Authors:  Louise Chopinet; Tina Batista-Napotnik; Audrey Montigny; Matej Rebersek; Justin Teissié; Marie-Pierre Rols; Damijan Miklavčič
Journal:  J Membr Biol       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 1.843

9.  Immunogenicity and safety of xenogeneic vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 DNA vaccination in mice and dogs.

Authors:  Sofie Denies; Laetitia Cicchelero; Ingeborgh Polis; Niek N Sanders
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-03-08

10.  Elucidating the Kinetics of Expression and Immune Cell Infiltration Resulting from Plasmid Gene Delivery Enhanced by Surface Dermal Electroporation.

Authors:  Janess M Mendoza; Dinah H Amante; Gleb Kichaev; Christine L Knott; William B Kiosses; Trevor R F Smith; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.