Literature DB >> 24051434

Tolerability of intramuscular and intradermal delivery by CELLECTRA(®) adaptive constant current electroporation device in healthy volunteers.

Malissa C Diehl1, Jessica C Lee1, Stephen E Daniels2, Pablo Tebas3, Amir S Khan1, Mary Giffear1, Niranjan Y Sardesai1, Mark L Bagarazzi1.   

Abstract

DNA vaccines are being developed as a potentially safe and effective immunization platform. However, translation of DNA vaccines into a clinical setting has produced results that have fallen short of those generated in a preclinical setting. Various strategies are being developed to address this lack of potency, including improvements in delivery methods. Electroporation (EP) creates transient increases in cell membrane permeability, thus enhancing DNA uptake and leading to a more robust immune response. Here, we report on the safety and tolerability of delivering sterile saline via intramuscular (IM) or intradermal (ID) injection followed by in vivo electroporation using the CELLECTRA(®) adaptive constant current device in healthy adults from two open-label studies. Pain, as assessed by VAS, was highest immediately after EP but diminishes by about 50% within 5 min. Mean VAS scores appear to correlate with the amount of energy delivered and depth of needle insertion, especially for intramuscular EP. Mean scores did not exceed 7 out of 10 or 3 out of 10 for IM and ID EP, respectively. The majority of adverse events included mild to moderate injection site reactions that resolved within one day. No deaths or serious adverse events were reported during the course of either study. Overall, injection followed by EP with the CELLECTRA(®) device was well-tolerated and no significant safety concerns were identified. These studies support the further development of electroporation as a vaccine delivery method to enhance immunogenicity, particularly for diseases in which traditional vaccination approaches are ineffective.

Entities:  

Keywords:  electroporation; intradermal; intramuscular; vaccination; visual analog scale

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24051434      PMCID: PMC3906411          DOI: 10.4161/hv.24702

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother        ISSN: 2164-5515            Impact factor:   3.452


  29 in total

1.  Plasmid DNA vaccination using skin electroporation promotes poly-functional CD4 T-cell responses.

Authors:  Andreas Bråve; Sanna Nyström; Anna-Karin Roos; Steven E Applequist
Journal:  Immunol Cell Biol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.126

Review 2.  Electroporation for DNA immunization: clinical application.

Authors:  Sylvia van Drunen Littel-van den Hurk; D Hannaman
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 5.217

Review 3.  Electrotransfer of therapeutic molecules into tissues.

Authors:  Maja Cemazar; Gregor Sersa
Journal:  Curr Opin Mol Ther       Date:  2007-12

Review 4.  Electroporation for the delivery of DNA-based vaccines and immunotherapeutics: current clinical developments.

Authors:  Angela M Bodles-Brakhop; Richard Heller; Ruxandra Draghia-Akli
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  DNA vaccination in rhesus macaques induces potent immune responses and decreases acute and chronic viremia after SIVmac251 challenge.

Authors:  Margherita Rosati; Cristina Bergamaschi; Antonio Valentin; Viraj Kulkarni; Rashmi Jalah; Candido Alicea; Vainav Patel; Agneta S von Gegerfelt; David C Montefiori; David J Venzon; Amir S Khan; Ruxandra Draghia-Akli; Koen K A Van Rompay; Barbara K Felber; George N Pavlakis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Electroporation delivery of DNA vaccines: prospects for success.

Authors:  Niranjan Y Sardesai; David B Weiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 7.486

7.  Persistent immune responses induced by a human immunodeficiency virus DNA vaccine delivered in association with electroporation in the skin of nonhuman primates.

Authors:  Frédéric Martinon; Katrin Kaldma; Rein Sikut; Slobodan Culina; Gabrielle Romain; Mari Tuomela; Maarja Adojaan; Andres Männik; Urve Toots; Toomas Kivisild; Julie Morin; Patricia Brochard; Benoît Delache; Antonella Tripiciano; Fabrizio Ensoli; Ioana Stanescu; Roger Le Grand; Mart Ustav
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.695

8.  Tolerability of two sequential electroporation treatments using MedPulser DNA delivery system (DDS) in healthy adults.

Authors:  Mark Wallace; Barbara Evans; Sandra Woods; Robin Mogg; Lei Zhang; Adam C Finnefrock; Dietmar Rabussay; Michael Fons; John Mallee; Devan Mehrotra; Florian Schödel; Luwy Musey
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 11.454

9.  Increased immune responses in rhesus macaques by DNA vaccination combined with electroporation.

Authors:  Margherita Rosati; Antonio Valentin; Rashmi Jalah; Vainav Patel; Agneta von Gegerfelt; Cristina Bergamaschi; Candido Alicea; Deborah Weiss; Jim Treece; Ranajit Pal; Phillip D Markham; Ernesto T A Marques; J Thomas August; Amir Khan; Ruxandra Draghia-Akli; Barbara K Felber; George N Pavlakis
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2008-04-21       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Intradermal/subcutaneous immunization by electroporation improves plasmid vaccine delivery and potency in pigs and rhesus macaques.

Authors:  Lauren A Hirao; Ling Wu; Amir S Khan; Abhishek Satishchandran; Ruxandra Draghia-Akli; David B Weiner
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  36 in total

1.  Skin Transfection Patterns and Expression Kinetics of Electroporation-Enhanced Plasmid Delivery Using the CELLECTRA-3P, a Portable Next-Generation Dermal Electroporation Device.

Authors:  Dinah H Amante; Trevor R F Smith; Janess M Mendoza; Katherine Schultheis; Jay R McCoy; Amir S Khan; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Methods       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.396

2.  Electroporation mediated DNA vaccination directly to a mucosal surface results in improved immune responses.

Authors:  Gleb Kichaev; Janess M Mendoza; Dinah Amante; Trevor R F Smith; Jay R McCoy; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2013-06-11       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Robust antibody and cellular responses induced by DNA-only vaccination for HIV.

Authors:  Stephen C De Rosa; Srilatha Edupuganti; Yunda Huang; Xue Han; Marnie Elizaga; Edith Swann; Laura Polakowski; Spyros A Kalams; Michael C Keefer; Janine Maenza; Yiwen Lu; Megan C Wise; Jian Yan; Matthew P Morrow; Amir S Khan; Jean D Boyer; Laurent Humeau; Scott White; Michael Pensiero; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Mark L Bagarazzi; David B Weiner; Guido Ferrari; Georgia D Tomaras; David C Montefiori; Lawrence Corey; M Juliana McElrath
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2020-07-09

4.  Development of an intradermal DNA vaccine delivery strategy to achieve single-dose immunity against respiratory syncytial virus.

Authors:  Trevor R F Smith; Katherine Schultheis; Matthew P Morrow; Kimberly A Kraynyak; Jay R McCoy; Kevin C Yim; Karuppiah Muthumani; Laurent Humeau; David B Weiner; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.641

5.  Acceptability and tolerability of repeated intramuscular electroporation of Multi-antigenic HIV (HIVMAG) DNA vaccine among healthy African participants in a phase 1 randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Juliet Mpendo; Gaudensia Mutua; Annet Nanvubya; Omu Anzala; Julien Nyombayire; Etienne Karita; Len Dally; Drew Hannaman; Matt Price; Patricia E Fast; Frances Priddy; Huub C Gelderblom; Nancy K Hills
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Safety and Immunogenicity of PENNVAX-G DNA Prime Administered by Biojector 2000 or CELLECTRA Electroporation Device With Modified Vaccinia Ankara-CMDR Boost.

Authors:  Julie A Ake; Alexandra Schuetz; Poonam Pegu; Lindsay Wieczorek; Michael A Eller; Hannah Kibuuka; Fredrick Sawe; Leonard Maboko; Victoria Polonis; Nicos Karasavva; David Weiner; Arthur Sekiziyivu; Josphat Kosgei; Marco Missanga; Arne Kroidl; Philipp Mann; Silvia Ratto-Kim; Leigh Anne Eller; Patricia Earl; Bernard Moss; Julie Dorsey-Spitz; Mark Milazzo; G Laissa Ouedraogo; Farrukh Rizvi; Jian Yan; Amir S Khan; Sheila Peel; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Nelson L Michael; Viseth Ngauy; Mary Marovich; Merlin L Robb
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 7.  Various theranostics and immunization strategies based on nanotechnology against Covid-19 pandemic: An interdisciplinary view.

Authors:  Sujan Chatterjee; Snehasis Mishra; Kaustav Dutta Chowdhury; Chandan Kumar Ghosh; Krishna Das Saha
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 6.780

8.  DNA vaccination strategy targets epidermal dendritic cells, initiating their migration and induction of a host immune response.

Authors:  Trevor Rf Smith; Katherine Schultheis; William B Kiosses; Dinah H Amante; Janess M Mendoza; John C Stone; Jay R McCoy; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 6.698

9.  An Intramuscular DNA Vaccine for SARS-CoV-2 Decreases Viral Lung Load but Not Lung Pathology in Syrian Hamsters.

Authors:  Shanna S Leventhal; Chad Clancy; Jesse Erasmus; Heinz Feldmann; David W Hawman
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-05-12

10.  Elucidating the Kinetics of Expression and Immune Cell Infiltration Resulting from Plasmid Gene Delivery Enhanced by Surface Dermal Electroporation.

Authors:  Janess M Mendoza; Dinah H Amante; Gleb Kichaev; Christine L Knott; William B Kiosses; Trevor R F Smith; Niranjan Y Sardesai; Kate E Broderick
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2013-08-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.