Literature DB >> 22067778

Revival of the intrauterine device: increased insertions among US women with employer-sponsored insurance, 2002-2008.

Xin Xu1, Maurizio Macaluso, Lijing Ouyang, Andrzej Kulczycki, Scott D Grosse.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Use of the intrauterine device (IUD) in the United States has recently increased. New evidence for women with employer-sponsored health insurance permits analysis of variation and trends in such use. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of annual IUD insertion rates between 2002 and 2008 was conducted by evaluating claims from the MarketScan® Commercial Research Databases for US women insured by plans that covered IUD insertions. Estimates were weighted to be nationally representative.
RESULTS: IUD insertion rates increased from 1.6/1000 women of reproductive age to 9.8/1000 over 2002-2008 and varied substantially by state. Insertion rates of the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) increased from 0.4/1000 to 7.7/1000, whereas the insertion rates of copper T380A IUD (copper IUD) increased from 0.6/1000 to 1.5/1000. IUD insertions, which are most common among women aged 25-34 years, increased at roughly the same rate across all age groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The sixfold increase in IUD insertion rates between 2002 and 2008 was accompanied by an increase in the share IUD use with the LNG-IUS from 40% to 85%. Substantial geographic and age variations existed. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22067778     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.06.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  6 in total

1.  Geographic Variation in Characteristics of Postpartum Women Using Female Sterilization.

Authors:  Kari White; Joseph E Potter; Nikki Zite
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2015-07-29

2.  The impact of out-of-pocket costs on the use of intrauterine contraception among women with employer-sponsored insurance.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Stacie B Dusetzina; A Mark Fendrick; Nancy L Keating; Vanessa K Dalton
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Early Impact of the Affordable Care Act on Uptake of Long-acting Reversible Contraceptive Methods.

Authors:  Lydia E Pace; Stacie B Dusetzina; Nancy L Keating
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Trends in use of and complications from intrauterine contraceptive devices and tubal ligation or occlusion.

Authors:  Brandon Howard; ElizaBeth Grubb; Maureen J Lage; Boxiong Tang
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Intrauterine devices and endometrial cancer risk: a pooled analysis of the Epidemiology of Endometrial Cancer Consortium.

Authors:  Ashley S Felix; Mia M Gaudet; Carlo La Vecchia; Christina M Nagle; Xiao Ou Shu; Elisabete Weiderpass; Hans Olov Adami; Shirley Beresford; Leslie Bernstein; Chu Chen; Linda S Cook; Immaculata De Vivo; Jennifer A Doherty; Christine M Friedenreich; Susan M Gapstur; Dierdre Hill; Pamela L Horn-Ross; James V Lacey; Fabio Levi; Xiaolin Liang; Lingeng Lu; Anthony Magliocco; Susan E McCann; Eva Negri; Sara H Olson; Julie R Palmer; Alpa V Patel; Stacey Petruzella; Jennifer Prescott; Harvey A Risch; Lynn Rosenberg; Mark E Sherman; Amanda B Spurdle; Penelope M Webb; Lauren A Wise; Yong-Bing Xiang; Wanghong Xu; Hannah P Yang; Herbert Yu; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Louise A Brinton
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 7.316

6.  Temporal trend in the use of hysteroscopic vs laparoscopic sterilization and the characteristics of commercially insured and Medicaid-insured females in the US who have had the procedures.

Authors:  Patricia I Carney; Jay Lin; Fang Xia; Amy Law
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2016-05-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.