Literature DB >> 22067772

Interest in using intrauterine contraception when the option of self-removal is provided.

Diana Greene Foster1, Deborah Karasek, Daniel Grossman, Philip Darney, Eleanor Bimla Schwarz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The need to ask a clinician to remove an intrauterine contraceptive (IUC) may deter some women from trying the method. There is little risk to a woman who attempts to remove her own IUC. STUDY
DESIGN: In 2010, 602 women seeking abortion completed a computerized survey in the waiting rooms of six US abortion clinics. The survey asked women to rate their interest in using the currently available IUCs and a hypothetical "new" self-removable IUC.
RESULTS: Overall, 25% of respondents would be more willing to try an IUC if they could remove it themselves. Interest in a self-removable IUC was higher among women who were already considering use of an IUC. After controlling for multiple covariates, women who were likely to have unprotected sex in the future were more willing to consider use of an IUC if they had the option of self-removal (odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.03-2.59).
CONCLUSIONS: Informing women that they may safely attempt self-removal of their IUC may increase interest in trying an IUC.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22067772     DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  9 in total

1.  Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City.

Authors:  Julia Potter; Susan E Rubin; Peter Sherman
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.

Authors:  Anu Manchikanti Gomez; Liza Fuentes; Amy Allina
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-05-23

3.  Developing an intrauterine device self-removal guide: a mixed methods qualitative and small pilot study.

Authors:  Francesca Collins; Kelly Gilmore; Kelsey A Petrie; Lyndsey S Benson
Journal:  Contracept Reprod Med       Date:  2022-07-01

Review 4.  Provider and lay perspectives on intra-uterine contraception: a global review.

Authors:  Marina A S Daniele; John Cleland; Lenka Benova; Moazzam Ali
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.223

5.  Society of Family Planning Clinical Recommendations: Contraceptive Care in the Context of Pandemic Response.

Authors:  Bianca M Stifani; Tessa Madden; Elizabeth Micks; Ghazaleh Moayedi; Jessica Tarleton; Lyndsey S Benson
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Knowledge and attitudes about long-acting reversible contraception among Latina women who desire sterilization.

Authors:  Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Joseph E Potter; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013 Jul-Aug

7.  Women's social communication about IUDs: a qualitative analysis.

Authors:  Nora Anderson; Jody Steinauer; Thomas Valente; Jenna Koblentz; Christine Dehlendorf
Journal:  Perspect Sex Reprod Health       Date:  2014-06-03

8.  IUD self-removal as self-care: Research is needed in low and middle-income countries.

Authors:  Alice F Cartwright; Amelia C L Mackenzie; Rebecca L Callahan; M Valeria Bahamondes; Laneta J Dorflinger
Journal:  Front Glob Womens Health       Date:  2022-09-07

9.  Predictors of non-use of intrauterine contraception among women aged 18-49 years in a general practice setting in the UK.

Authors:  Susan H Walker; Victoria L Newton; Lesley Hoggart; Mike J Parker
Journal:  Open Access J Contracept       Date:  2016-10-21
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.