Literature DB >> 22067696

Effects of false-positive results in a breast screening program on anxiety, depression and health-related quality of life.

Bjorg Hafslund1, Birgitte Espehaug, Monica W Nortvedt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Decreased anxiety has been reported among women with false-positive results in mammography screening programs. No long-term effects have been fully demonstrated, and the findings for anxiety and depression are contradictory. Few studies have addressed changes in health-related quality of life (HRQOL).
OBJECTIVE: The objective was to study the short- and long-term effects such as changes in anxiety, depression, and HRQOL among women with false-positive results.
METHODS: With a longitudinal study design, data were collected on anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) and HRQOL (Short-Form 36 [SF-36] Health Survey) among women with false-positive results before screening, at recall, and at 3 and 6 months after screening. Controls (negative results in screening) were measured before screening and at 6 months after.
RESULTS: Women with false-positive results (n = 128) showed increased anxiety at recall (mean, 4.6 [SD, 3.7]) versus before screening (P = .04), but this decreased until 6 months after screening. Depression was increased until 6 months after screening (not statistically significant). Women with false-positive results scored lower than did control subjects on general health (P = .02) and mental health (P = .03) and higher on depression (P = .045) at 6 months after screening.
CONCLUSIONS: Efforts should be made to minimize anxiety at recall and depression after screening. Further research is needed on the long-term effects of recall and any effects on HRQOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Information about the prevalence of false-positive results and time until unambiguous diagnostic results should be improved. Information leaflet based on evidence needs to be continually updated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22067696     DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182341ddb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Nurs        ISSN: 0162-220X            Impact factor:   2.592


  12 in total

1.  Psychological distress, social withdrawal, and coping following receipt of an abnormal mammogram among different ethnicities: a mediation model.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Noah Espinoza; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Oncol Nurs Forum       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 2.172

2.  Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines.

Authors:  Cristina O'Donoghue; Martin Eklund; Elissa M Ozanne; Laura J Esserman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Do the benefits outweigh the side effects of colorectal cancer surveillance? A systematic review.

Authors:  Knut Magne Augestad; Johnie Rose; Benjamin Crawshaw; Gregory Cooper; Conor Delaney
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2014-05-15

4.  Psychological Outcomes After a False Positive Mammogram: Preliminary Evidence for Ethnic Differences Across Time.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Shirley A A Beresford; Beti Thompson
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2016-02-19

5.  Screening for depression in medical research: ethical challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Aisling M Sheehan; Hannah McGee
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 2.652

6.  Impact of lung cancer screening results on participant health-related quality of life and state anxiety in the National Lung Screening Trial.

Authors:  Ilana F Gareen; Fenghai Duan; Erin M Greco; Bradley S Snyder; Phillip M Boiselle; Elyse R Park; Dennis Fryback; Constantine Gatsonis
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Effects of the Financial Crisis on Psychotropic Drug Consumption in a Cohort from a Semi-Urban Region in Catalonia, Spain.

Authors:  Maria A Barceló; Montserrat Coll-Negre; Gabriel Coll-de-Tuero; Marc Saez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Societal costs and effects of implementing population-based mammography screening in Greenland.

Authors:  Maria Klitgaard Christensen; Birgit V Niclasen; Kim Moesgaard Iburg
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.228

9.  Breast cancer risk, worry, and anxiety: Effect on patient perceptions of false-positive screening results.

Authors:  Janie M Lee; Kathryn P Lowry; Jessica E Cott Chubiz; J Shannon Swan; Tina Motazedi; Elkan F Halpern; Anna N A Tosteson; G Scott Gazelle; Karen Donelan
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2020-02-13       Impact factor: 4.380

10.  Impact of whole-body MRI in a general population study.

Authors:  Carsten Oliver Schmidt; Elizabeth Sierocinski; Katrin Hegenscheid; Sebastian E Baumeister; Hans J Grabe; Henry Völzke
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 8.082

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.