Literature DB >> 22066597

Improved normal tissue sparing in head and neck radiotherapy using biological cost function based-IMRT.

N Anderson1, C Lawford, V Khoo, M Rolfo, D L Joon, M Wada.   

Abstract

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has reduced the impact of acute and late toxicities associated with head and neck radiotherapy. Treatment planning system (TPS) advances in biological cost function based optimization (BBO) and improved segmentation techniques have increased organ at risk (OAR) sparing compared to conventional dose-based optimization (DBO). A planning study was undertaken to compare OAR avoidance in DBO and BBO treatment planning. Simultaneous integrated boost treatment plans were produced for 10 head and neck patients using both planning systems. Plans were compared for tar get coverage and OAR avoidance. Comparisons were made using the BBO TPS Monte Carlo dose engine to eliminate differences due to inherent algorithms. Target coverage (V95%) was maintained for both solutions. BBO produced lower OAR doses, with statistically significant improvement to left (12.3%, p = 0.005) and right parotid mean dose (16.9%, p = 0.004), larynx V50_Gy (71.0%, p = 0.005), spinal cord (21.9%, p < 0.001) and brain stem dose maximums (31.5%, p = 0.002). This study observed improved OAR avoidance with BBO planning. Further investigations will be undertaken to review any clinical benefit of this improved planned dosimetry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22066597      PMCID: PMC4509883          DOI: 10.1177/153303461101000607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  39 in total

1.  Fast Monte Carlo dose calculation for photon beams based on the VMC electron algorithm.

Authors:  M Fippel
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Assessment of different IMRT boost delivery methods on target coverage and normal-tissue sparing.

Authors:  Nesrin Dogan; Stephanie King; Bahman Emami; Najeeb Mohideen; Nena Mirkovic; Leonid B Leybovich; Anil Sethi
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 7.038

3.  Predictive factors of local-regional recurrences following parotid sparing intensity modulated or 3D conformal radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Mary Feng; Siavash Jabbari; Alexander Lin; Carol R Bradford; Douglas B Chepeha; Theodoros N Teknos; Francis P Worden; Christina Tsien; Matthew J Schipper; Gregory T Wolf; Laura A Dawson; Avraham Eisbruch
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 6.280

4.  Comparison of dose-volume histograms of IMRT treatment plans for ethmoid sinus cancer computed by advanced treatment planning systems including Monte Carlo.

Authors:  Leen Paelinck; Bart De Smedt; Nick Reynaert; Marc Coghe; Werner De Gersem; Carlos De Wagter; Barbara Vanderstraeten; Hubert Thierens; Wilfried De Neve
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2006-11-20       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  Changes in salivary gland function after radiotherapy of head and neck tumors measured by quantitative pertechnetate scintigraphy: comparison of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and conventional radiation therapy with and without Amifostine.

Authors:  Marc W Münter; Simone Hoffner; Holger Hof; Klaus K Herfarth; Uwe Haberkorn; Volker Rudat; Peter Huber; Jürgen Debus; Christian P Karger
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 7.038

6.  Investigation of geometrical and scoring grid resolution for Monte Carlo dose calculations for IMRT.

Authors:  B De Smedt; B Vanderstraeten; N Reynaert; W De Neve; H Thierens
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Monte Carlo-based dosimetry of head-and-neck patients treated with SIB-IMRT.

Authors:  Nirmal Sakthi; Paul Keall; Ivaylo Mihaylov; Qiuwen Wu; Yan Wu; Jeffrey F Williamson; Rupert Schmidt-Ullrich; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2006-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

8.  Dosimetric predictors of xerostomia for head-and-neck cancer patients treated with the smart (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) boost technique.

Authors:  Chad M Amosson; Bin S Teh; T John Van; Nathan Uy; Eugene Huang; Wei-Yuan Mai; Anna Frolov; Shiao Y Woo; J Kam Chiu; L Steven Carpenter; Hsin H Lu; Walter H Grant; E Brian Butler
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 7.038

9.  Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in the treatment of oropharyngeal cancer: clinical outcomes and patterns of failure.

Authors:  Megan E Daly; Quynh-Thu Le; Peter G Maxim; Billy W Loo; Michael J Kaplan; Nancy J Fischbein; Harlan Pinto; Daniel T Chang
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 7.038

10.  The potential for dose dumping in normal tissues with IMRT for pelvic and H&N cancers.

Authors:  Nandanuri M S Reddy; Andrzej K Mazur; Seshadri Sampath; Adrian Osian; Brij M Sood; Akkamma Ravi; Dattatreyudu Nori
Journal:  Med Dosim       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.482

View more
  2 in total

1.  Estimation of the effects of normal tissue sparing using equivalent uniform dose-based optimization.

Authors:  K Senthilkumar; K J Maria Das; K Balasubramanian; A C Deka; B R Patil
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2016 Apr-Jun

2.  Clinical and dosimetric risk stratification for patients at high-risk of feeding tube use during definitive IMRT for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  James E Jackson; Nigel J Anderson; Morikatsu Wada; Michal Schneider; Michael Poulsen; Maureen Rolfo; Maziar Fahandej; Hui Gan; Daryl Lim Joon; Vincent Khoo
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-02-28
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.