Literature DB >> 22066096

Clinicopathologic characteristics of serosa-positive gastric carcinoma in elderly patients.

Ho Gun Kim1, Hyo Kang, Dong Yi Kim, Jae Kyoon Joo, Seong Yeob Ryu, Jae Hyuk Lee.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The relationship between the prognosis and the age of patients with gastric carcinoma is controversial. This study examined the clinicopathologic features of elderly gastric carcinoma patients with serosal invasion.
METHODS: We reviewed the hospital records of 136 elderly gastric carcinoma patients with serosal invasion retrospectively to compare the clinicopathologic findings in the elderly (aged > 70 years) and young (aged < 36 years).
RESULTS: The 5-year survival rates of elderly and young patients with curative resection did not differ statistically (33.9% vs. 43.3%; P = 0.318). Multivariate analysis showed that two factors were independent, statistically significant parameters associated with survival: histologic type (risk ratio, 1.805; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.041 to 3.132; P < 0.05) and operative curability (risk ratio, 2.506; 95% CI, 1.371 to 4.581; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that elderly gastric carcinoma patients with serosal invasion do not have a worse prognosis than young patients. The important prognostic factor was whether the patients underwent curative resection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Age; Elderly; Gastric carcinoma; Prognosis; Serosal invasion

Year:  2011        PMID: 22066096      PMCID: PMC3204556          DOI: 10.4174/jkss.2011.81.1.19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Korean Surg Soc        ISSN: 1226-0053


  25 in total

1.  Surgery in patients aged 80 years and over. A retrospective comparative study from 1981 and 1987.

Authors:  I M Schöön; S Arvidsson
Journal:  Eur J Surg       Date:  1991-04

Review 2.  Clinicopathologic studies of gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  M Mori; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  1990

3.  The outcome of surgical treatment for gastric carcinoma in the elderly.

Authors:  H Katai; M Sasako; T Sano; K Maruyama
Journal:  Jpn J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  The biology of aging: the current research agenda.

Authors:  W B Ershler; D L Longo
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1997-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Gastric resection in the aged (> or = 80 years) with gastric carcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

Authors:  H Kubota; T Kotoh; D K Dhar; R Masunaga; M Tachibana; H Tabara; H Kohno; N Nagasue
Journal:  Aust N Z J Surg       Date:  2000-04

6.  Clinicopathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma in young and elderly patients: a comparative study.

Authors:  H Medina-Franco; M J Heslin; R Cortes-Gonzalez
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Predictors of long-term survival in node-positive gastric carcinoma patients with curative resection.

Authors:  Dong Yi Kim; Jae Kyoon Joo; Young Kyu Park; Seong Yeob Ryu; Young Jin Kim; Shin Kon Kim
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-11-07       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Comparative clinicopathologic features of early gastric cancer in young and older patients.

Authors:  S Fujimoto; M Takahashi; H Ohkubo; T Mutou; M Kure; H Masaoka; K Kobayashi
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 9.  The epidemiology of gastric cancer.

Authors:  David M Roder
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 7.370

10.  [Comparison between treatment results for gastric cancer in younger and elderly patients].

Authors:  P Piso; H Bektas; U Werner; T Becker; H Aselmann; H J Schlitt; J Klempnauer
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 0.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.