Literature DB >> 22065963

An alternative path for the evolution of biological nitrogen fixation.

Eric S Boyd1, Trinity L Hamilton, John W Peters.   

Abstract

Nitrogenase catalyzed nitrogen fixation is the process by which life converts dinitrogen gas into fixed nitrogen in the form of bioavailable ammonia. The most common form of nitrogenase today requires a complex metal cluster containing molybdenum (Mo), although alternative forms exist which contain vanadium (V) or only iron (Fe). It has been suggested that Mo-independent forms of nitrogenase (V and Fe) were responsible for N(2) fixation on early Earth because oceans were Mo-depleted and Fe-rich. Phylogenetic- and structure-based examinations of multiple nitrogenase proteins suggest that such an evolutionary path is unlikely. Rather, our results indicate an evolutionary path whereby Mo-dependent nitrogenase emerged within the methanogenic archaea and then gave rise to the alternative forms suggesting that they arose later, perhaps in response to local Mo limitation. Structural inferences of nitrogenase proteins and related paralogs suggest that the ancestor of all nitrogenases had an open cavity capable of binding metal clusters which conferred reactivity. The evolution of the nitrogenase ancestor and its associated bound metal cluster was controlled by the availability of fixed nitrogen in combination with local environmental factors that influenced metal availability until a point in Earth's geologic history where the most desirable metal, Mo, became sufficiently bioavailable to bring about and refine the solution (Mo-nitrogenase) we see perpetuated in extant biology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  evolution; great oxidation event; iron; metalloenzyme; nitrogenase; oxygen molybdenum; sulfide; vanadium

Year:  2011        PMID: 22065963      PMCID: PMC3207485          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00205

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Biological nitrogen fixation, the reduction of dinitrogen (N2) to ammonia, accounts for roughly two-thirds of the fixed nitrogen (N) produced on Earth today (Rubio and Ludden, 2008). The emergence of biological N2 fixation therefore enabled life to access the vast reserves of N present as N2 gas in our atmosphere (Rees, 1993), a feature that would have profoundly impacted the history of life on earth and the biogeochemical cycles that it modulates (Falkowski et al., 2008; Canfield et al., 2010). Today, biological N2 fixation is catalyzed by at least three genetically distinct but evolutionarily related nitrogenases. The majority of present-day biological nitrogen fixation is catalyzed by the molybdenum-nitrogenase (encoded by nifHDK), an oxygen-sensitive, metalloenzyme complex composed of the Fe protein (product of nifH) and the MoFe heterotetramer (products of nifDK; Rubio and Ludden, 2008). The Fe protein is a homodimer bridged by an intersubunit [4Fe–4S] cluster that serves as the obligate electron donor to the MoFe protein (Georgiadis et al., 1992). The MoFe protein is a α2β2 heterotetramer that houses the P-cluster, an [8Fe–7S] cluster that shuttles electrons to the FeMo-cofactor, a [Mo–7Fe–9S-homocitrate] cluster that provides the substrate reduction site (Kim and Rees, 1992). Two “alternative” forms of nitrogenase have also been identified in the genomes of organisms that encode for Nif (Joerger and Bishop, 1988; Raymond et al., 2004; Soboh et al., 2010; Boyd et al., 2011). The nitrogenase encoded by the vnfHDK genes is believed to contain vanadium in place of molybdenum in the active site cofactor, whereas the nitrogenase encoded by the anfHDK genes appears to contain only Fe as the metal constituent of its active site cofactor (Hales et al., 1986; Chisnell et al., 1988). When fixed nitrogen is limiting, the expression and activity of the alternative forms is regulated by the availability of Mo or V (Joerger and Bishop, 1988; Kessler et al., 1997; Hamilton et al., 2011). Chemical stratigraphic measurements indicate that ancient oceans were limited in soluble Mo prior to the rise of oxygen ∼2.5 Ga (Anbar et al., 2007) due to the insolubility of Mo-sulfides under anoxic conditions (Helz et al., 1996). This prompted the proposal that Anf and Vnf represent primitive forms of nitrogenase that predate Nif (Anbar and Knoll, 2002; Raymond et al., 2004). Past phylogenetic analyses of the nitrogenase structural gene products have failed to provide convincing evidence for the trajectory of specific metal incorporation into the active site cofactor of nitrogenase during its evolution (Raymond et al., 2004; Soboh et al., 2010; Boyd et al., 2011). Here, we examine concatenations of protein homologs of the structural components shared between all known nitrogenases (H, D, and K; Raymond et al., 2004; Mehta and Baross, 2006; Dekas et al., 2009; Boyd et al., 2011). The results of our phylogenetic- and structure-based examination indicate an evolutionary path whereby Mo-dependent nitrogenase gave rise to the alternative forms suggesting that they arose later, perhaps in response to local Mo limitation. These results, when coupled with considerations of the physiology and the biochemistry of nitrogen fixation, lead to a new model for the stepwise evolution of nitrogenase and other related complex metalloproteins.

Materials and Methods

Phylogenetic analysis

Representative homologs of Anf/Vnf/NifHDK and uncharacterized HDK (Table A1 in Appendix) were compiled as previously described (Soboh et al., 2010; Boyd et al., 2011). Individual H, D, and K homologs were aligned using CLUSTALX (version 2.0.8) specifying the Gonnet 250 protein substitution matrix and default gap extension and opening penalties (Larkin et al., 2007) as previously described (Boyd et al., 2011) with ChlLNB/BchLNB from Anabaena variabilis ATCC 29413 and Chlorobium limicola DSM 245 serving as outgroups. The individual alignment blocks were concatenated, subjected to evolutionary model prediction, and the phylogeny of each concatenated protein sequence evaluated using MrBayes (version 3.1.2; Huelsenbeck and Ronquist, 2001) and PhyML (version 3.0; Guindon and Gascuel, 2003) employing the WAG + I + G evolutionary model (Appendix) as identified by ProtTest (version 2.0; Abascal et al., 2005). In phylogenetic reconstructions using MrBayes, tree topologies were sampled every 500 generations over 450,000 generations (after a burnin of 50,000) at likelihood stationarity and after convergence of two separate Markov chain Monte Carlo runs (average SD of split frequencies <0.05). A consensus phylogenetic tree was projected from 1,800 trees using FigTree (version 1.2.2). One hundred bootstrap replicates were performed in phylogenetic reconstructions using PhyML. Matrices describing the Rao phylogenetic dissimilarity of concatenated HDK homologs, inferred using both MrBayes and PhyML, were generated using Phylocom (version 4.0.1; Webb et al., 2008).
Table A1

Accession numbers of representative sequences used in the present study.

ANF/VNF/NIF/UNCHARACTERIZED NITROGENASE HDK HOMOLOGS
TaxonNifH homologsNifD homologsNifK homologs
Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans ATCC 23270YP_002219685YP_002219684YP_002219683
Alkaliphilusmetalliredigens QYMFYP_001321310YP_001321307YP_001321306
Anabaenavariabilis ATCC 29413 vnfYP_324416YP_324526YP_324527
Anabaenavariabilis ATCC 29413 nifYP_324741YP_324742YP_324743
Azotobactervinelandii AvOP nifYP_002797378YP_002797379YP_002797380
Azotobactervinelandii AvOP anfYP_002801975YP_002801974YP_002801972
Azotobactervinelandii AvOP vnfYP_002797502YP_002797497YP_002797495
Beijerinckiaindica subsp. indica ATCC 9039YP_001831615YP_001831616YP_001831617
Caldicellulosiruptorsaccharolyticus DSM 8903YP_001181234YP_001181231YP_001181230
Candidatus Azobacteroides pseudotrichonymphae CFP2YP_002309219YP_002309222YP_002309223
Candidatus Desulforudis audaxviator MP104CYP_001716343YP_001716346YP_001716347
Candidatus Methanosphaerula palustris E1-9cYP_002465657YP_002465654YP_002465653
Chlorobiumtepidum TLS000NP_662417NP_662420NP_662421
Chloroherpetonthalassium ATCC 35110YP_001996732YP_001996735YP_001996737
Chloroherpetonthalassium ATCC 35110YP_001995946YP_001995943YP_001995942
Clostridiumacetobutylicum ATCC 824NP_346894NP_346897NP_346898
Clostridiumbeijerinckii NCIMB 8052ABR34169ABR34172ABR34173
Clostridiumkluyveri NBRC 12016YP_001395138YP_001395137YP_001395135
Dehalococcoidesethenogenes 195YP_181872YP_181869YP_181868
Desulfitobacteriumhafniense Y51YP_520504YP_520503YP_520502
Desulfotomaculumreducens MI-1YP_001114150YP_001114147YP_001114146
Desulfovibriovulgaris subsp. vulgaris DP4YP_009055YP_961292YP_009051
Geobacterlovleyi SZYP_001950896YP_001950895YP_001950894
Geobacter sp. M21YP_003021955YP_003021954YP_003021953
Heliobacteriummodesticaldum Ice1YP_001679706YP_001679707YP_001679708
Klebsiellapneumoniae 342YP_002237565YP_002237564YP_002237563
Lyngbya sp. PCC 8106ZP_01620768ZP_01620767ZP_01620766
Magnetospirillummagnetotacticum MS-1YP_420937ZP_00054386ZP_00054385
Methanobacteriumthermoautotrophicum str. Delta HNP_276673NP_276676NP_276677
Methanococcusaeolicus Nankai-3YP_001325622YP_001325619YP_001325618
Methanococcusmaripaludis strain S2NP_987973NP_987976NP_987977
Methanococcusvannielii SBYP_001322591YP_001322588YP_001322587
Methanosarcinaacetivorans str. C2ANP_618766NP_618769NP_618770
Methanosarcinaacetivorans str. C2ANP_616152NP_616155NP_616157
Methanosarcinaacetivorans str. C2ANP_616144NP_616149NP_616147
Methylacidiphiluminfernorum V4YP_001940528YP_001940526YP_001940525
Methylocellasilvestris BL2YP_002363879YP_002363878YP_002363877
Nostoc sp. PCC 7120NP_485497NP_485484NP_485483
Opitutaceae bacterium TAV2ZP_03723745ZP_03723746ZP_03723747
Pelobactercarbinolicus DSM 2380YP_357508YP_357509YP_357510
Rhodobactersphaeroides ATCC 17025YP_001167452YP_001167453YP_001167454
Rhodopseudomonaspalustris BisA53YP_782790YP_782789YP_782787
Rhodopseudomonaspalustris HaA2YP_484590YP_484591YP_484592
Rhodospirillumcentenum SWYP_002299844YP_484591YP_002299842
Rhodospirillumrubrum ATCC 11170YP_426483YP_426482YP_426480
Roseiflexuscastenholzii DSM 13941YP_001434094YP_001434092YP_001434091
Roseiflexus sp. RS-1YP_001275558YP_001275556YP_001275555
Sinorhizobiummedicae WSM419YP_001314762YP_001314761YP_001314760
Synechococcus sp. JA-2-3B′aYP_475238YP_476681YP_476682
Syntrophobacterfumaroxidans MPOBYP_845148YP_845145YP_845144
Thermodesulfovibrioyellowstonii DSM 11347YP_002249508YP_002249507YP_002249506
Zymomonasmobilis subsp. mobilis ZM4ZP_04760608YP_163559YP_163560
Methanocaldococcusinfernus MEYP_003615677YP_003615674YP_003615673
Syntrophothermuslipocalidus DSM 12680YP_003703438YP_003703435YP_003703434
Methanocaldococcusvulcanius M7YP_003247421YP_003247424YP_003247425
Methanosarcinamazei strain Goe1NP_632743NP_632746NP_632747
Methanocaldococcus sp. FS406-22YP_003457468YP_003457471YP_003457472
Methanothermococcusokinawensis IH1ZP_07330063ZP_07330060ZP_07330059
OscillochloristrichoidesZP_07684114ZP_07684112ZP_07684111
Anabaenavariabilis ATCC 29413YP_322845YP_322843YP_323968
Chlorobiumlimicola DSM 245YP_001944195YP_001944197YP_001944196
NFL HOMOLOGS
TaxonNflH homologsNflD homologs
MethanobacteriumthermoautotrophicumAAB85148AAB85997
MethanobrevibactersmithiiYP_001274280YP_001273733
MethanocaldococcusjannaschiiNP_247874NP_248427
Methanocaldococcus sp. FS406-22YP_003458692YP_003458054
MethanococcoidesburtoniiYP_565723YP_565722
MethanococcusaeolicusYP_001325412YP_001325501
Methanococcusmaripaludis C5YP_001098039YP_001097721
Methanococcusmaripaludis C6YP_001548852YP_001548533
Methanococcusmaripaludis C7YP_001330364YP_001330639
Methanococcusmaripaludis S2CAF29703CAF29984
MethanococcusvannieliiYP_001323663YP_001323921
MethanocorpusculumlabreanumYP_001029608YP_001029961
MethanopyruskandleriAAM02629AAM02598
MethanosaetathermophilaYP_843600YP_842548
MethanosarcinaacetivoransAAM05043AAM06983
MethanosarcinabarkeriYP_303736YP_303910
MethanosarcinamazeiAAM30210AAM30211
MethanosphaerastadtmanaeYP_448145YP_448474
CHL/BCH HOMOLOGS
TaxonChlL/BchL homologsChlN/BchN homologsChlB/BchB
Bradyrhizobium sp. BTAi1YP_001242230YP_001242233YP_001242232
Methylobacteriumpopuli BJ001YP_001927985YP_001927988YP_001927987
Erythrobacter sp. NAP1ZP_01041680ZP_01041677ZP_01041678
Hoefleaphototrophica DFL-43ZP_02167537ZP_02167540ZP_02167539
Halorhodospirahalophila SL1YP_001003200YP_001003203YP_001003202
Prochlorococcus sp. CC9311YP_731178YP_731176YP_731177
Synechococcus sp. RCC307YP_001227822YP_001227820YP_001227821
Prochlorococcusmarinus MIT 9515YP_001010923YP_001010925YP_001010924
Roseobacter sp. AzwK-3bZP_01902759ZP_01902756YP_002464757
Chloroflexusaggregans DSM 9485YP_002464754YP_002464757YP_002464756
Roseiflexuscastenholzii HLO8, DSM 13941YP_001431649YP_001431647YP_001431648
Chlorobiumphaeobacteroides DSM 266YP_912798YP_912800YP_912799
Cyanothece sp. CCY 0110ZP_01730952ZP_01730955ZP_01728917
Synechococcus sp. JA-2-3BYP_477257YP_477255YP_478401
Gloeobacterviolaceus PCC 7421NP_925316NP_925315NP_923161
Heliobacteriummodesticaldum Ice1YP_001679876YP_001679877YP_001679878
Anabaenavariabilis ATCC 29413YP_322845YP_322843YP_323968
Chlorobiumlimicola DSM 245YP_001944195YP_001944197YP_001944196

Representative sequences were selected to sample the primary lineages of each homolog, using approaches as outlined in Boyd et al. (.

Structural analyses

The structures of the representative H, D, and K homologs selected for phylogenetic analysis were inferred using the CPH homology server for protein homology modeling (Nielsen et al., 2010) using the NifH (Georgiadis et al., 1992), NifD (Peters et al., 1997; Chiu et al., 2001; Mayer et al., 2002), and NifK (Peters et al., 1997; Chiu et al., 2001; Mayer et al., 2002) crystal structures from Azotobacter vinelandii AvOP. The inferred structures for each H, D, and K homolog were imported into PyMol (version 1.4). The root-mean-square-deviations (RMSD) in the Cαi positions were calculated for each individual inferred H, D, and K homolog structure in relation to the other inferred H, D, or K homolog structures resulting in a pairwise matrix describing the structural RMSD (e.g., structural dissimilarity) for H, D, and K homologs. RMSDs generated for H, D, and K homologs, were normalized to compensate for differing HDK protein lengths, and the normalized H, D, and K matrices were then averaged to produce an HDK RMSD matrix for use in statistical analyses. PyMol was also used to generate images of sequence conservation in the active site cavity of Anf/Vnf/NifDK homologs.

Statistical analyses

Mantel regressions of dissimilarity matrices were performed using XL Stat (version 2009.5.01). Ten thousand permutations employing two-tailed t-tests were used to determine the strength and significance of the relationships between dissimilarity matrices, respectively.

Results and Discussion

Bayesian and maximum-likelihood phylogenetic analyses of concatenated protein homologs of the required structural components (H, D, and K) encoded by characterized and putative anf, vnf, and nif regulons (Raymond et al., 2004; Mehta and Baross, 2006; Dekas et al., 2009; Boyd et al., 2011) yielded congruent topologies (Figure A1 in Appendix) with well-supported lineages that correspond to the nitrogenase active site metal content (Figures 1 and A2 in Appendix). nif-Encoded HDK protein homologs formed two distinct lineages, one of which was comprised of proteins derived solely from hydrogenotrophic methanogens that branched at the base of the tree. The second Nif lineage was comprised of more recently evolved NifHDK homologs from both bacterial and methanogen genomes. These findings are consistent with the results of a recent phylogenetic analysis which indicate that Nif emerged within the hydrogenotrophic methanogen lineage ∼2.2 Ga (Boyd et al., 2011), at a time when Mo concentrations in oceans are thought to have begun to increase (Anbar et al., 2007).
Figure A1

Plot of a Mantel regression of a matrix describing the Rao phylogenetic dissimilarity of concatenated HDK homologs inferred by PhyML as a function of the Rao phylogenetic dissimilarity of concatenated HDK homologs inferred by MrBayes. The strong positively trending correlation suggests that the topologies of the two trees are congruent.

Figure 1

Bayesian inferred phylogenetic tree of concatenated HDK homologs (see Figure . Posterior probabilities are indicated above or below nodes. Branches are colored dark blue (Mo-nitrogenase, Nif), green (V-nitrogenase, Vnf), purple (Fe-nitrogenase, Anf), red (uncharacterized nitrogenase), and light blue (uncharacterized homolog). The hash at the root was introduced to conserve space.

Figure A2

Maximum-likelihood inferred phylogenetic tree of concatenated HDK homologs. Bootstrap values based on 100 replicates are indicated at each node. Branches are colored dark blue (Mo-nitrogenase, Nif), green (V-nitrogenase, Vnf), purple (Fe-nitrogenase, Anf), red (uncharacterized nitrogenase), and light blue (uncharacterized homolog). The hash at the root was introduced to conserve space.

Bayesian inferred phylogenetic tree of concatenated HDK homologs (see Figure . Posterior probabilities are indicated above or below nodes. Branches are colored dark blue (Mo-nitrogenase, Nif), green (V-nitrogenase, Vnf), purple (Fe-nitrogenase, Anf), red (uncharacterized nitrogenase), and light blue (uncharacterized homolog). The hash at the root was introduced to conserve space. Nested within the two Nif sublineages is a monophyletic lineage comprised of Vnf and Anf nitrogenase, indicating that Vnf and Anf are derived from Nif. It is likely that the ancestor of the Anf/Vnf lineage resulted from gene duplication within the hydrogenotrophic methanogen lineage and was not singly laterally transferred, a finding that is consistent with the observation that anf and vnf have yet to be identified in a genome that does not also encode for nif (Raymond et al., 2004; Boyd et al., 2011). VnfHDK homologs nest AnfHDK homologs with strong statistical support, providing evidence that Anf is derived from Vnf, both of which are derived from Nif. The latter conclusion appears to be supported by the results of a recent transcriptomic profiling of A. vinelandii, which indicated that a number of nif-encoded genes are up-regulated under conditions favoring the expression of Vnf and Anf (Hamilton et al., 2011). The observation that VnfHDK and AnfHDK from Methanosarcinales branch closely, coupled with the fact that these operons are located proximal in the genomes of these organisms, may suggest that anf is the result of a recent duplication of the vnf operon within the Methanosarcinales lineage. The acquisition of vnf within the Methanosarcinales lineage may have been the result of a lateral gene transfer (LGT) event with a firmicute, a finding that is consistent with the close spatial proximity noted between members of the Methanosarcinales and Firmicutes in a variety of anoxic environments (Stams, 1994) and with previous reports of LGT of individual genes and metabolic pathways between these two anaerobic lineages (Beiko et al., 2005; Fournier and Gogarten, 2008; Boyd et al., 2011). Importantly, evidence presented here and elsewhere (Raymond et al., 2004; Boyd et al., 2011) indicates that nif may have been acquired in the Methanosarcinales via LGT; however, it is unclear based on this dataset if that event predates the acquisition of vnf in this lineage and the subsequent duplication of vnf that resulted in anf. Nevertheless, considering that the biosynthesis of Anf and Vnf examined to date require nif-encoded gene products (Joerger et al., 1986; Kennedy and Dean, 1992; Hamilton et al., 2011), the acquisition of vnf and the duplication of vnf that led to anf are most likely to postdate the acquisition of nif within this lineage. Collectively, the evidence suggests that both Nif and Anf evolved in the methanogenic archaea, a guild of organisms which typically inhabit anoxic environments where Mo is in limited supply (Helz et al., 1996). Together with the fact that the expression of Anf and Vnf is tightly regulated by the availability of Mo and V (Joerger and Bishop, 1988; Hamilton et al., 2011), this set of observations suggests that the transient fluctuations in metal availability in anoxic environments may have been the impetus to incorporate new metals into the active site cluster of nitrogenase. We also examined the evolutionary history of HDK homologs from the genomes of organisms that have been shown to fix N2 (Mehta and Baross, 2006; Dekas et al., 2009), but for which detailed biochemical analysis of the active site cofactor has yet to be performed (denoted as “uncharacterized nitrogenase” in Figures 1 and A2 in Appendix). These proteins formed a monophyletic lineage that branched after Nif derived from hydrogenotrophic methanogens and the Anf/Vnf lineages (Figure 1) indicating they emerged after Nif and Vnf, and possibly Anf. The “uncharacterized nitrogenase” lineage is comprised of proteins derived from strictly anaerobic taxa within the Firmicutes, as well as the methanogenic and methanotrophic archaea (Figure 1). A separate lineage comprised of uncharacterized HDK homologs that have only been identified in the genomes of filamentous anoxygenic phototrophic bacteria, branches after Nif, Vnf, and the uncharacterized nitrogenases indicating that they are the most recently evolved lineage of putative nitrogenase. A physiological or biochemical role for these proteins has yet to be conclusively demonstrated. We inferred the protein structures of HDK homologs from anf, vnf, nif, and uncharacterized operons using homology modeling based on the structures of NifHDK from A. vinelandii (Georgiadis et al., 1992; Kim and Rees, 1992). Pairwise comparisons of the inferred protein structures enabled the generation of a matrix that describes their structural dissimilarity. A regression of this matrix and a matrix describing the phylogenetic dissimilarity of the concatenated HDK proteins revealed a significant and positive relationship (Mantel R2 = 0.23, p < 0.01; Figure A3 in Appendix). This indicates that the structure of nitrogenase has evolved significantly through time. Conserved residues that line the active site pocket in Anf/Vnf/NifD inferred through homology modeling (Figure A4 in Appendix) suggest that once the active site cavity evolved, the majority of the residues in the cavity and the cluster-coordinating ligands were maintained despite differences in the metal composition of the cofactor (Figure A5 in Appendix).
Figure A3

Plot of a Mantel regression of a matrix describing the average RMSD for H, D, and K protein structures inferred using homology modeling as a function of the Rao phylogenetic dissimilarity of concatenated HDK homologs inferred by MrBayes. The strong correlation suggests a relationship between the evolution of sequences and their inferred structures, implying that the HDK structure is evolving. The slope of the line linear regression (∼2) suggests that the evolution of protein structure is constrained to a greater extent than the evolution of the primary sequences.

Figure A4

Structural alignment of the inferred structures of DK homologs indicating conservation in the active site (A) and P-cluster binding cavity (B). Ribbon diagram of the superimposition of NifDK from Azotobacter vinelandii AvOP (D, violet and K, gray), NifDK from Methanococcus maripaludis strain S2 (D, wheat and NifK, blue), UncDK from Methanocaldococcus sp. FS406-22 (D, cyan and K, orange), UncDK from Roseiflexus sp. RS-1 (D, marine, and K, sand), VnfDK from Methanosarcina acetivorans str. C2A (D, raspberry, and K, pale green), and AnfDK from Azotobacter vinelandii AvOP (D, green, and K, salmon), with the FeMo-co (A) and P-cluster (B) depicted as stick representations. Dark red, Fe; yellow, S; gray, C; red, O; teal, Mo; unknown, magenta. Protein Data Bank ID for Azotobacter vinelandii AvOP 1MIN.

Figure A5

Amino acid sequence conservation in selected residues that ligate FeMo-co (Cys-275, red box, and His-442, blue box) and that have been implicated as important in the FeMo-co binding pocket (indicated by a gray box). Representative NifD, VnfD, AnfD, and UncD (uncharacterized nitrogenase). Numbering is based on NifD from Azotobacter vinelandii AvOP. Abbreviations: A.v., Azotobacter vinelandii AvOP; M.a., Methanosarcina acetivorans str. C2A; M.m., Methanococcus maripaludis strain S2; R.c., Roseiflexus sp. RS-1; M.c. Methanocaldococcus sp. FS406-22. The conservation in the active site environment and active site custer ligands between classes of nitrogenase suggest that once the active site cavity evolved, it was maintained through time.

We examined phylogenetic and structural relationships among proteins that are evolutionarily related to nitrogenase, including those required to biosynthesize bacteriochlorophyll (BchN; Hearst et al., 1985; Burke et al., 1993) and those that have been proposed to catalyze an analogous reaction in Ni porphyrin F430 biosynthesis (NflD; Staples et al., 2007). Phylogenetic reconstruction of Anf/Vnf/NifD, BchN, and NflD revealed three lineages, with NflD proteins forming a lineage that bisects a lineage comprising Anf/Vnf/NifD and a lineage comprising ChlN/BchN (Figure 2). These findings are consistent with a previous phylogenetic analysis of concatenated Anf/Vnf/NifHD, BchLN, and NflHD proteins (Raymond et al., 2004), which together suggest that Nfl is ancestral to Anf/Vnf/Nif and Bch (Staples et al., 2007). Intriguingly, NflD proteins share little sequence conservation with the active site cavity of Anf/Vnf/NifD and BchN. Likewise, the cofactor coordinating ligands in Anf/Vnf/NifD are not conserved in BchN sequences, although the crystal structure of BchN reveals an open cavity for the binding of protochlorophyllide instead of the bound cofactor observed in nitrogenase (Muraki et al., 2010). Homology modeling of NflD from Methanocaldococcus jannaschii DSM 2661 threaded on the structure of BchN (Muraki et al., 2010) revealed an open cavity that is similar to that of BchN that may serve as the substrate binding site. Thus, the two derived states (Anf/Vnf/NifD and BchN) have maintained similar structural architecture to that of the inferred ancestral state (e.g., NflD) but appear to have fine-tuned cavity residues to bind target substrates as the paralogs diversified. This leads to a model for the emergence of nitrogenase (Figure 3) whereby a gene encoding for an ancestral protein complex with a cavity similar to that observed in the inferred structure of NflD duplicated, leading to the evolutionary precursor of BchN and Anf/Vnf/NifD. Serendipitously, metals (e.g., Fe) or metal clusters (e.g., 4Fe–4S) were bound in the cavity of the ancestor in a non-specific manner, resulting in an enzyme complex with altered reactivity, perhaps toward N2 reduction. In response to selective pressure of limited fixed nitrogen on early Earth, genes and associated gene products were presumably recruited to improve the enzyme stepwise through the modification of the metal cofactor (Rubio and Ludden, 2008; Hu and Ribbe, 2011). In parallel, the active site was refined to yield a cavity that binds the active site cofactor FeMo-co thereby fine-tuning the structural determinants for nitrogenase catalysis. In this mechanism, it is not inconceivable that the size and dimension of the nitrogenase cofactor were constrained somewhat by the structure of the ancestor. This might be supported by the observation that the end-to-end dimensions of the FeMo-cofactor of Mo-nitrogenase are not that different from those of bacteriochlorophyll or F430. Given that the as isolated FeMo-cofactor is not reactive toward N2 on its own, the aforementioned stepwise evolution of nitrogenase may be the only mechanism by which the biochemical pathway for cofactor biosynthesis could have evolved in response to the selective pressure of fixed nitrogen limitation.
Figure 2

Bayesian inferred phylogenetic reconstruction of Anf/Vnf/NifD, BchN, and NflD proteins. The putative substrates and cofactors for each protein lineage are indicated below each respective clade. Posterior probabilities for each collapsed node are indicated. Nodes have been collapsed and hashes introduced to conserve space.

Figure 3

Model depicting the divergence of nitrogenase (NifD) and protochlorophyllide reductase (ChlN/BchN) from a NflD ancestor. The stepwise evolution of cofactor biosynthesis leading to the acquisition of metal specificity in the covalently bound active site metallocluster, where Mo acquisition and Mo-nitrogenase predates V acquisition and V-nitrogenase, and V acquisition predates Fe-only nitrogenase. ChlN/BchN bind substrates in their active site cavities non-covalently and release these substrates following reduction (Muraki et al., 2010). Abbreviations: Mo, molybdenum; V, vanadium; Nif, Mo-dependent nitrogenase; Vnf, V-dependent nitrogenase; Anf, Fe-only nitrogenase; Bch, BchN protein involved in bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis; Chl, ChlN protein involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis.

Bayesian inferred phylogenetic reconstruction of Anf/Vnf/NifD, BchN, and NflD proteins. The putative substrates and cofactors for each protein lineage are indicated below each respective clade. Posterior probabilities for each collapsed node are indicated. Nodes have been collapsed and hashes introduced to conserve space. Model depicting the divergence of nitrogenase (NifD) and protochlorophyllide reductase (ChlN/BchN) from a NflD ancestor. The stepwise evolution of cofactor biosynthesis leading to the acquisition of metal specificity in the covalently bound active site metallocluster, where Mo acquisition and Mo-nitrogenase predates V acquisition and V-nitrogenase, and V acquisition predates Fe-only nitrogenase. ChlN/BchN bind substrates in their active site cavities non-covalently and release these substrates following reduction (Muraki et al., 2010). Abbreviations: Mo, molybdenum; V, vanadium; Nif, Mo-dependent nitrogenase; Vnf, V-dependent nitrogenase; Anf, Fe-only nitrogenase; Bch, BchN protein involved in bacteriochlorophyll biosynthesis; Chl, ChlN protein involved in chlorophyll biosynthesis. In summary, the Mo-nitrogenase we see today in extant biology is not likely to be the first nitrogenase associated with early life on Earth, a finding that is in line with the dogma supported by geochemistry (Anbar and Knoll, 2002; Anbar, 2008). However, in contrast with what has been proposed previously (Anbar and Knoll, 2002; Raymond et al., 2004; Anbar, 2008), the results indicate that alternative nitrogenases (V- and Fe-only forms) are not ancestors of the Mo-nitrogenase but rather are derived from Mo-nitrogenase. The common ancestor of Nif/Vnf/Anf, Bch/Chl, and Nfl had a cavity capable of binding certain porphyrins and/or metal cluster fragments. The nature of the ancestral nitrogenase enzyme and its associated bound metal cluster was likely controlled by the selective pressure imposed by fixed nitrogen limitation in combination with local environmental metal availability until a point in Earth history (e.g., the “Great Oxidation Event”) when Mo became sufficiently bioavailable (Anbar and Knoll, 2002; Anbar, 2008) and the most favorable solution for biological nitrogen fixation (Mo-nitrogenase) emerged that is reflective of today’s extant enzyme. These results reveal a new paradigm for the evolution of biological nitrogen fixation and provide key insights into the manner in which early life forms might have exploited the reactivity of their mineral environment prior to evolving the refined complex metalloenzymes observed today.

Author Contributions

Eric S. Boyd designed the study and performed phylogenetic and statistical analyses. Trinity L. Hamilton generated the inferred protein structures. John W. Peters supervised the work. All authors contributed to the writing of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  37 in total

Review 1.  Proterozoic ocean chemistry and evolution: a bioinorganic bridge?

Authors:  A D Anbar; A H Knoll
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-08-16       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Oceans. Elements and evolution.

Authors:  Ariel D Anbar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Nitrogenase phylogeny and the molybdenum dependence of nitrogen fixation in Methanococcus maripaludis.

Authors:  P S Kessler; J McLarnan; J A Leigh
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Isolation of a new vanadium-containing nitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii.

Authors:  B J Hales; E E Case; J E Morningstar; M F Dzeda; L A Mauterer
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-11-18       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  A putative nitrogenase reductase gene found in the nucleotide sequences from the photosynthetic gene cluster of R. capsulata.

Authors:  J E Hearst; M Alberti; R F Doolittle
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Bacterial alternative nitrogen fixation systems.

Authors:  R D Joerger; P E Bishop
Journal:  Crit Rev Microbiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 7.624

7.  Biosynthesis of Nitrogenase FeMoco.

Authors:  Yilin Hu; Markus W Ribbe
Journal:  Coord Chem Rev       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 22.315

8.  MgATP-Bound and nucleotide-free structures of a nitrogenase protein complex between the Leu 127 Delta-Fe-protein and the MoFe-protein.

Authors:  H Chiu; J W Peters; W N Lanzilotta; M J Ryle; L C Seefeldt; J B Howard; D C Rees
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2001-01-23       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Deep-sea archaea fix and share nitrogen in methane-consuming microbial consortia.

Authors:  Anne E Dekas; Rachel S Poretsky; Victoria J Orphan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Early evolution of photosynthesis: clues from nitrogenase and chlorophyll iron proteins.

Authors:  D H Burke; J E Hearst; A Sidow
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  31 in total

1.  Functional divergence outlines the evolution of novel protein function in NifH/BchL protein family.

Authors:  Subarna Thakur; Asim K Bothra; Arnab Sen
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.826

2.  Nitrogen isotope fractionation by alternative nitrogenases and past ocean anoxia.

Authors:  Xinning Zhang; Daniel M Sigman; François M M Morel; Anne M L Kraepiel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Reduction of Substrates by Nitrogenases.

Authors:  Lance C Seefeldt; Zhi-Yong Yang; Dmitriy A Lukoyanov; Derek F Harris; Dennis R Dean; Simone Raugei; Brian M Hoffman
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-16       Impact factor: 60.622

4.  Isotopic evidence for biological nitrogen fixation by molybdenum-nitrogenase from 3.2 Gyr.

Authors:  Eva E Stüeken; Roger Buick; Bradley M Guy; Matthew C Koehler
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 5.  Multidomain ribosomal protein trees and the planctobacterial origin of neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria).

Authors:  Thomas Cavalier-Smith; Ema E-Yung Chao
Journal:  Protoplasma       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 3.356

Review 6.  Reactivity, Mechanism, and Assembly of the Alternative Nitrogenases.

Authors:  Andrew J Jasniewski; Chi Chung Lee; Markus W Ribbe; Yilin Hu
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 60.622

7.  Evolution of molybdenum nitrogenase during the transition from anaerobic to aerobic metabolism.

Authors:  Eric S Boyd; Amaya M Garcia Costas; Trinity L Hamilton; Florence Mus; John W Peters
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-03-02       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  Electron Transfer to Nitrogenase in Different Genomic and Metabolic Backgrounds.

Authors:  Saroj Poudel; Daniel R Colman; Kathryn R Fixen; Rhesa N Ledbetter; Yanning Zheng; Natasha Pence; Lance C Seefeldt; John W Peters; Caroline S Harwood; Eric S Boyd
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Expression, Isolation, and Characterization of Vanadium Nitrogenase from Azotobacter vinelandii.

Authors:  Katharina Parison; Jakob Gies-Elterlein; Christian Trncik; Oliver Einsle
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2021

10.  Distribution of nitrogen fixation and nitrogenase-like sequences amongst microbial genomes.

Authors:  Patricia C Dos Santos; Zhong Fang; Steven W Mason; João C Setubal; Ray Dixon
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.