Thomas Cavalier-Smith1, Ema E-Yung Chao2. 1. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK. tom.cavalier-smith@zoo.ox.ac.uk. 2. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford, OX1 3PS, UK.
Abstract
Palaeontologically, eubacteria are > 3× older than neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Cell biology contrasts ancestral eubacterial murein peptidoglycan walls and derived neomuran N-linked glycoprotein coats/walls. Misinterpreting long stems connecting clade neomura to eubacteria on ribosomal sequence trees (plus misinterpreted protein paralogue trees) obscured this historical pattern. Universal multiprotein ribosomal protein (RP) trees, more accurate than rRNA trees, are taxonomically undersampled. To reduce contradictions with genically richer eukaryote trees and improve eubacterial phylogeny, we constructed site-heterogeneous and maximum-likelihood universal three-domain, two-domain, and single-domain trees for 143 eukaryotes (branching now congruent with 187-protein trees), 60 archaebacteria, and 151 taxonomically representative eubacteria, using 51 and 26 RPs. Site-heterogeneous trees greatly improve eubacterial phylogeny and higher classification, e.g. showing gracilicute monophyly, that many 'rDNA-phyla' belong in Proteobacteria, and reveal robust new phyla Synthermota and Aquithermota. Monoderm Posibacteria and Mollicutes (two separate wall losses) are both polyphyletic: multiple outer membrane losses in Endobacteria occurred separately from Actinobacteria; neither phylum is related to Chloroflexi, the most divergent prokaryotes, which originated photosynthesis (new model proposed). RP trees support an eozoan root for eukaryotes and are consistent with archaebacteria being their sisters and rooted between Filarchaeota (=Proteoarchaeota, including 'Asgardia') and Euryarchaeota sensu-lato (including ultrasimplified 'DPANN' whose long branches often distort trees). Two-domain trees group eukaryotes within Planctobacteria, and archaebacteria with Planctobacteria/Sphingobacteria. Integrated molecular/palaeontological evidence favours negibacterial ancestors for neomura and all life. Unique presence of key pre-neomuran characters favours Planctobacteria only as ancestral to neomura, which apparently arose by coevolutionary repercussions (explained here in detail, including RP replacement) of simultaneous outer membrane and murein loss. Planctobacterial C-1 methanotrophic enzymes are likely ancestral to archaebacterial methanogenesis and β-propeller-α-solenoid proteins to eukaryotic vesicle coats, nuclear-pore-complexes, and intraciliary transport. Planctobacterial chaperone-independent 4/5-protofilament microtubules and MamK actin-ancestors prepared for eukaryote intracellular motility, mitosis, cytokinesis, and phagocytosis. We refute numerous wrong ideas about the universal tree.
Palaeontologically, eubacteria are > 3× older than neomura (eukaryotes, archaebacteria). Cell biology contrasts ancestral eubacterial murein peptidoglycan walls and derived nen class="Chemical">omuran N-linked glycoprotein coats/walls. Misinterpreting long stems connecting clade neomura to eubacteria on ribosomal sequence trees (plus misinterpreted protein paralogue trees) obscured this historical pattern. Universal multiprotein ribosomal protein (RP) trees, more accurate than rRNA trees, are taxonomically undersampled. To reduce contradictions with genically richer eukaryote trees and improve eubacterial phylogeny, we constructed site-heterogeneous and maximum-likelihood universal three-domain, two-domain, and single-domain trees for 143 eukaryotes (branching now congruent with 187-protein trees), 60 archaebacteria, and 151 taxonomically representative eubacteria, using 51 and 26 RPs. Site-heterogeneous trees greatly improve eubacterial phylogeny and higher classification, e.g. showing gracilicute monophyly, that many 'rDNA-phyla' belong in Proteobacteria, and reveal robust new phyla Synthermota and Aquithermota. Monoderm Posibacteria and Mollicutes (two separate wall losses) are both polyphyletic: multiple outer membrane losses in Endobacteria occurred separately fromActinobacteria; neither phylum is related to Chloroflexi, the most divergent prokaryotes, which originated photosynthesis (new model proposed). RP trees support an eozoan root for eukaryotes and are consistent with archaebacteria being their sisters and rooted between Filarchaeota (=Proteoarchaeota, including 'Asgardia') and Euryarchaeota sensu-lato (including ultrasimplified 'DPANN' whose long branches often distort trees). Two-domain trees group eukaryotes within Planctobacteria, and archaebacteria with Planctobacteria/Sphingobacteria. Integrated molecular/palaeontological evidence favours negibacterial ancestors for neomura and all life. Unique presence of key pre-neomuran characters favours Planctobacteria only as ancestral to neomura, which apparently arose by coevolutionary repercussions (explained here in detail, including RP replacement) of simultaneous outer membrane and murein loss. Planctobacterial C-1 methanotrophic enzymes are likely ancestral to archaebacterial methanogenesis and β-propeller-α-solenoid proteins to eukaryotic vesicle coats, nuclear-pore-complexes, and intraciliary transport. Planctobacterial chaperone-independent 4/5-protofilament microtubules and MamK actin-ancestors prepared for eukaryote intracellular motility, mitosis, cytokinesis, and phagocytosis. We refute numerous wrong ideas about the universal tree.
Entities:
Keywords:
Archaebacteria; Eubacterial phylogeny; Eukaryogenesis; Ribosomal protein universal tree; Rooting eukaryote trees
Authors: Abderrazak El Albani; Stefan Bengtson; Donald E Canfield; Andrey Bekker; Roberto Macchiarelli; Arnaud Mazurier; Emma U Hammarlund; Philippe Boulvais; Jean-Jacques Dupuy; Claude Fontaine; Franz T Fürsich; François Gauthier-Lafaye; Philippe Janvier; Emmanuelle Javaux; Frantz Ossa Ossa; Anne-Catherine Pierson-Wickmann; Armelle Riboulleau; Paul Sardini; Daniel Vachard; Martin Whitehouse; Alain Meunier Journal: Nature Date: 2010-07-01 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Jeffrey S McLean; Mary-Jane Lombardo; Jonathan H Badger; Anna Edlund; Mark Novotny; Joyclyn Yee-Greenbaum; Nikolay Vyahhi; Adam P Hall; Youngik Yang; Christopher L Dupont; Michael G Ziegler; Hamidreza Chitsaz; Andrew E Allen; Shibu Yooseph; Glenn Tesler; Pavel A Pevzner; Robert M Friedman; Kenneth H Nealson; J Craig Venter; Roger S Lasken Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-06-10 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Seyda Acar; David B Carlson; Madhu S Budamagunta; Vladimir Yarov-Yarovoy; John J Correia; Milady R Niñonuevo; Weitao Jia; Li Tao; Julie A Leary; John C Voss; James E Evans; Jonathan M Scholey Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2013 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Benjamin H Meyer; Panagiotis S Adam; Ben A Wagstaff; George E Kolyfetis; Alexander J Probst; Sonja V Albers; Helge C Dorfmueller Journal: Elife Date: 2022-04-08 Impact factor: 8.713
Authors: Sebastian Petters; Verena Groß; Andrea Söllinger; Michelle Pichler; Anne Reinhard; Mia Maria Bengtsson; Tim Urich Journal: ISME J Date: 2021-03-21 Impact factor: 11.217
Authors: Paulina Prorok; Inga R Grin; Bakhyt T Matkarimov; Alexander A Ishchenko; Jacques Laval; Dmitry O Zharkov; Murat Saparbaev Journal: Cells Date: 2021-06-24 Impact factor: 6.600