| Literature DB >> 22065933 |
Chieh-Chih Tsai1, Shi-Bei Wu, Ching-Yu Cheng, Shu-Ching Kao, Hui-Chuan Kau, Shui-Mei Lee, Yau-Huei Wei.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To investigate whether orbital fibroblasts from patients with Graves' ophthalmopathy (GO) are more responsive to oxidative stress.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22065933 PMCID: PMC3209425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Vis ISSN: 1090-0535 Impact factor: 2.367
Intracellular levels of 8-OHdG and MDA before and after treatment of orbital fibroblasts with 200 μM H2O2.
| Normal | 2.75±0.24 | 3.52±0.20 | 128±5 | 0.005 |
| GO | 3.72±0.20 | 5.12±0.32 | 138±11 | 0.005 |
| | p=0.002 | | p=0.213 | |
| Normal | 219.80±35.67 | 275.33±40.49 | 126±7 | 0.027 |
| GO | 325.92±10.95 | 530.95±62.83 | 163±20 | 0.007 |
| p=0.002 | p=0.029 | |||
*Induction ratio=after H2O2 treatment value /baseline value (%).
Intracellular levels of reactive oxygen species in orbital fibroblasts before and after treatment with 200 μM H2O2.
| Normal | 94.29±1.90 | 102.22±3.47 | 108±3 | 0.039 |
| GO | 105.54±3.45 | 118.87±2.92 | 113±2 | <0.001 |
| | p=0.004 | | p=0.055 | |
| Normal | 105.18±1.79 | 118.81±0.76 | 113±2 | 0.007 |
| GO | 123.19±5.84 | 152.97±6.61 | 124±6 | 0.002 |
| p=0.004 | p=0.024 | |||
*Induction ratio=O2.- or H2O2 value after H2O2 treatment / baseline value (%). **Each measurement of cultured orbital fibroblasts was presented as a relative value, which was calculated by taking the intracellular ROS levels of the human skin fibroblasts CCD cell line as 100%.
Intracellular levels of antioxidant enzymes in orbital fibroblasts before and after treatment with 200 μM H2O2.
| Normal | 94.93±16.31 | 100.47±14.15 | 106±5 | 0.132 |
| GO | 86.33±13.02 | 84.14±7.57 | 99±13 | 0.742 |
| | p=0.470 | | p=0.393 | |
| Normal | 65.13±10.68 | 79.79±11.70 | 123±4 | 0.011 |
| GO | 165.70±30.19 | 244.93±45.67 | 148±5 | 0.002 |
| | p=0.003 | | p<0.001 | |
| Normal | 15.47±1.01 | 10.98±1.74 | 71±7 | 0.012 |
| GO | 16.15±1.95 | 6.66±1.04 | 41±3 | <0.001 |
| | p=0.613 | | p<0.001 | |
| Normal | 239.22±23.24 | 207.63±17.53 | 87±3 | 0.024 |
| GO | 136.42±6.48 | 59.91±11.75 | 44±8 | <0.001 |
| p<0.001 | p<0.001 | |||
*Induction ratio=enzyme activity after H2O2 treatment/baseline value (%).
GSH/GSSG ratio in orbital fibroblasts before and after treatment with 200 μM H2O2.
| Normal | 84.00±15.21 | 65.60±6.68 | 78.94±8.45 | 0.094 |
| GO | 43.15±6.10 | 21.58±3.58 | 50.75±10.86 | 0.008 |
| p=0.004 | p=0.014 | |||
*Induction ratio=GSH/GSSG value after H2O2 treatment/baseline value (%).
Figure 1Comparisons of the induction ratio (baseline value divided by after-treatment value) of superoxide anion (O2.-), H2O2, Mn-SOD, Cu,Zn-SOD, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and GSH/GSSG ratio between normal and GO fibroblasts in response to the treatment with 200 μM H2O2.
Figure 2Change of oxidative stress and antioxidant enzymes in cultured GO orbital fibroblasts in response to exogenous H2O2 . After treatment of orbital fibroblasts with 200 μM H2O2, the amplitude of increase in H2O2 and Mn-SOD activity and the amplitude of decrease in catalase activity, GPx activity, and GSH/GSSG ratio were exacerbated in GO fibroblasts as compared with controls.