BACKGROUND: The diffuse sclerosing (DSV) and tall cell (TCV) variants are considered aggressive subtypes of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) for which data are limited. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2008) was used to compare the incidence and clinical/pathologic characteristics of DSV and TCV with classic PTC. Prognostic factors associated with survival were analyzed by chi-square test, analysis of variance, log rank test, and Cox multivariate regression. RESULTS: There were 261 DSV, 573 TCV, and 42,904 PTC patients. Compared to a 60.8% increase in classic PTC incidence, DSV and TCV incidence increased by 126% (P (trend) = 0.052) and 158% (P (trend) = 0.002), respectively. Aggressive variants were associated with higher rates of extrathyroidal extension, multifocality, and nodal and distant metastasis (all P < 0.001) compared to classic PTC. Nodal metastasis was more likely with DSV (72.2% vs. 66.8% TCV vs. 56.3% PTC, P < 0.001); distant metastasis was most common with TCV (11.1% vs. 7.3% DSV vs. 4.3% PTC, P < 0.001). After adjustment, DSV [hazard ratio (HR) 1.8, P = 0.007] and TCV (HR 1.9, P < 0.001) histologies were associated with significantly reduced survival (5-year overall: 87.5% DSV, 80.6% TCV vs. 93.5% PTC, P < 0.001). Tumor size independently predicted worse prognosis for TCV (HR 1.29, P < 0.001) but not DSV patients. Thyroid surgery and radioiodine improved survival of DSV and TCV patients (all P < 0.05). Patients with aggressive variants who received external-beam radiotherapy did not experience improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: DSV and TCV are rare, increasing in incidence, and have a worse prognosis than classic PTC. Patients with these variants should be treated aggressively with thyroidectomy and radioiodine, regardless of tumor size.
BACKGROUND: The diffuse sclerosing (DSV) and tall cell (TCV) variants are considered aggressive subtypes of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) for which data are limited. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2008) was used to compare the incidence and clinical/pathologic characteristics of DSV and TCV with classic PTC. Prognostic factors associated with survival were analyzed by chi-square test, analysis of variance, log rank test, and Cox multivariate regression. RESULTS: There were 261 DSV, 573 TCV, and 42,904 PTC patients. Compared to a 60.8% increase in classic PTC incidence, DSV and TCV incidence increased by 126% (P (trend) = 0.052) and 158% (P (trend) = 0.002), respectively. Aggressive variants were associated with higher rates of extrathyroidal extension, multifocality, and nodal and distant metastasis (all P < 0.001) compared to classic PTC. Nodal metastasis was more likely with DSV (72.2% vs. 66.8% TCV vs. 56.3% PTC, P < 0.001); distant metastasis was most common with TCV (11.1% vs. 7.3% DSV vs. 4.3% PTC, P < 0.001). After adjustment, DSV [hazard ratio (HR) 1.8, P = 0.007] and TCV (HR 1.9, P < 0.001) histologies were associated with significantly reduced survival (5-year overall: 87.5% DSV, 80.6% TCV vs. 93.5% PTC, P < 0.001). Tumor size independently predicted worse prognosis for TCV (HR 1.29, P < 0.001) but not DSVpatients. Thyroid surgery and radioiodine improved survival of DSV and TCVpatients (all P < 0.05). Patients with aggressive variants who received external-beam radiotherapy did not experience improved survival. CONCLUSIONS:DSV and TCV are rare, increasing in incidence, and have a worse prognosis than classic PTC. Patients with these variants should be treated aggressively with thyroidectomy and radioiodine, regardless of tumor size.
Authors: Ryan K Orosco; Timon Hussain; Julia E Noel; David C Chang; Chrysoula Dosiou; Erik Mittra; Vasu Divi; Lisa A Orloff Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 5.678
Authors: Bryan R Haugen; Erik K Alexander; Keith C Bible; Gerard M Doherty; Susan J Mandel; Yuri E Nikiforov; Furio Pacini; Gregory W Randolph; Anna M Sawka; Martin Schlumberger; Kathryn G Schuff; Steven I Sherman; Julie Ann Sosa; David L Steward; R Michael Tuttle; Leonard Wartofsky Journal: Thyroid Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 6.568
Authors: R Forleo; N Fralassi; F Maino; M Capezzone; L Brilli; T Pilli; S Cantara; M G Castagna Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2020-05-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Jason D Prescott; Peter M Sadow; Richard A Hodin; Long Phi Le; Randall D Gaz; Gregory W Randolph; Antonia E Stephen; Sareh Parangi; Gilbert H Daniels; Carrie C Lubitz Journal: Surgery Date: 2012-12 Impact factor: 3.982