Literature DB >> 22065173

Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: how to achieve optimal results with simple punch technique.

Mohsen Naraghi1, Sayed Ziaeddin Tabatabaii Mohammadi, Alain Fabrice Sontou, Armin Farajzadeh Deroee, Masoud Boroojerdi.   

Abstract

Endonasal endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (EEDCR) has been popularized as a minimally invasive technique. Although preliminary reports revealed less success in comparison with external approaches, recent endonasal endoscopic surgeries on various types of DCR have preserved advantages of this technique while diminishing the failures. We described our experience on EEDCR, including the main advantages and disadvantages of it. Hundred consecutive cases of lachrymal problems underwent EEDCR utilizing simple punch removal of bone, instead of powered instrumentation or lasers. The medial aspect of the sac was removed in all of patients, while preserving normal mucosa around the sac. Hundred cases of EEDCR were performed on 81 patients, with 19 bilateral procedures. Nine procedures were performed under local anesthesia. Based on a mean 14 months follow-up, 95 cases were free of symptoms, revealing 95% success rate. The punch technique diminishes the expenses of powered or laser instrumentation with comparable results. It seems that preserving normal tissues and creating a patent rhinostomy with least surgical trauma and less subsequent scar, plays the most important role in achieving desirable results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22065173     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-011-1825-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  22 in total

1.  Comparative external versus endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: results in 115 patients (130 eyes).

Authors:  Y Cokkeser; C Evereklioglu; H Er
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.497

Review 2.  External vs. endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy: six of one, a half dozen of the other?

Authors:  Knut Eichhorn; Andrew R Harrison
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.761

3.  Endoscopic laser-assisted lacrimal surgery.

Authors:  R S Gonnering; D B Lyon; J C Fisher
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Endonasal versus external dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Deepa Anijeet; Lynne Dolan; Caroline J Macewen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-01-19

5.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  S H Rahman; K H Tarafder; M S Ahmed; K L Saha; A Tariq
Journal:  Mymensingh Med J       Date:  2011-01

6.  Endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy vs KTP 532 laser-assisted endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  D R Nayak; P Hazarika; R A W Rodrigues; S Pillai; R Balakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2005-10

7.  Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy and external dacryocystorhinostomy outcome profile in a general ophthalmic service unit: a comparative retrospective study.

Authors:  H A Ibrahim; M Batterbury; G Banhegyi; J McGalliard
Journal:  Ophthalmic Surg Lasers       Date:  2001 May-Jun

8.  Use of laser for dacrocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Mohammad Ajalloueyan; Mohammad Fartookzadeh; Hamid Parhizgar
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2007-04

9.  Results of endonasal laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  G A Boush; B N Lemke; R K Dortzbach
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Comparison of external dacryocystorhinostomy with nonlaser endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  Peter J Dolman
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  8 in total

1.  Powered endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy with radiowave instruments: surgical outcome according to obstruction level.

Authors:  Naohiro Yoshida; Hiromi Kanazawa; Akihiro Shinnabe; Yukiko Iino
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Primary Endonasal DCR Without Stent: Our Experience and Case Series Analysis.

Authors:  Shiv Kumar Raghuwanshi; Sapna Raghuwanshi; Mohit Agarwal; Gaurav Batni
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-06-11

3.  Outcomes of endoscopic endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy for intractable lacrimal dacryostenosis and associated factors.

Authors:  Tohru Tanigawa; Hirokazu Sasaki; Hiroshi Nonoyama; Yuichiro Horibe; Kunihiro Nishimura; Tetsuro Hoshino; Tetsuya Ogawa; Kenta Murotani; Hiromi Ueda; Masahiro Kaneda
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 1.779

4.  Prognostic factors for outcome of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Authors:  Shiu Ting Mak; Ida Yu-fong Io; Albert Chak-ming Wong
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  No thermal tool using methods in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy: no cautery, no drill, no illuminator, no more tears.

Authors:  Sun-Young Kim; Ji-Sun Paik; Su-Kyung Jung; Won-Kyung Cho; Suk-Woo Yang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  [Recognition and prevention of problems in lacrimal duct surgery].

Authors:  T Kühnel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Endoscopic Dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR): a comparative study between powered and non-powered technique.

Authors:  Islam Herzallah; Bassam Alzuraiqi; Naif Bawazeer; Osama Marglani; Ameen Alherabi; Sherif K Mohamed; Khalid Al-Qahtani; Talal Al-Khatib; Abdullah Alghamdi
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2015-12-22

8.  Posterior lacrimal sac approach technique without stenting in endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy.

Authors:  E Emanuelli; F Pagella; G Dané; A Pusateri; G Giourgos; P Carena; E Antoniazzi; P Verdecchia; E Matti
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.124

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.