OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between conventional external dacrocystorhinostomy (ext DCR) and endonasal laser-assisted DCR (ELADCR). DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. PATIENTS: The study included 210 consecutive patients (244 eyes) referred to hospital eye and ear, nose, and throat clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success rates and complications of ext DCR and ELADCR were compared after lacrimal ducts requiring DCR were randomly chosen and divided into 2 groups (ext DCR and ELADCR). RESULTS: The success rate was statistically equal in both groups (92.4% for ext DCR and 94.2% for ELADCR); however, morbidity (eg, intraoperative hemorrhage and wound scar) and operation time were less in the ELADCR group. CONCLUSION: Preoperative patient consultation for selection of the surgical modality may help select the procedure of choice for each patient with regard to aesthetics, anesthesia, operation time, and costs.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between conventional external dacrocystorhinostomy (ext DCR) and endonasal laser-assisted DCR (ELADCR). DESIGN: Prospective randomized trial. PATIENTS: The study included 210 consecutive patients (244 eyes) referred to hospital eye and ear, nose, and throat clinics. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success rates and complications of ext DCR and ELADCR were compared after lacrimal ducts requiring DCR were randomly chosen and divided into 2 groups (ext DCR and ELADCR). RESULTS: The success rate was statistically equal in both groups (92.4% for ext DCR and 94.2% for ELADCR); however, morbidity (eg, intraoperative hemorrhage and wound scar) and operation time were less in the ELADCR group. CONCLUSION: Preoperative patient consultation for selection of the surgical modality may help select the procedure of choice for each patient with regard to aesthetics, anesthesia, operation time, and costs.
Authors: Mustafa Doğan; Anar Alizada; Güliz Fatma Yavaş; Orhan Kemal Kahveci; Osman Bakan Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 1.779