Literature DB >> 22065158

Facial recognition software success rates for the identification of 3D surface reconstructed facial images: implications for patient privacy and security.

Jan C Mazura1, Krishna Juluru, Joseph J Chen, Tara A Morgan, Majnu John, Eliot L Siegel.   

Abstract

Image de-identification has focused on the removal of textual protected health information (PHI). Surface reconstructions of the face have the potential to reveal a subject's identity even when textual PHI is absent. This study assessed the ability of a computer application to match research subjects' 3D facial reconstructions with conventional photographs of their face. In a prospective study, 29 subjects underwent CT scans of the head and had frontal digital photographs of their face taken. Facial reconstructions of each CT dataset were generated on a 3D workstation. In phase 1, photographs of the 29 subjects undergoing CT scans were added to a digital directory and tested for recognition using facial recognition software. In phases 2-4, additional photographs were added in groups of 50 to increase the pool of possible matches and the test for recognition was repeated. As an internal control, photographs of all subjects were tested for recognition against an identical photograph. Of 3D reconstructions, 27.5% were matched correctly to corresponding photographs (95% upper CL, 40.1%). All study subject photographs were matched correctly to identical photographs (95% lower CL, 88.6%). Of 3D reconstructions, 96.6% were recognized simply as a face by the software (95% lower CL, 83.5%). Facial recognition software has the potential to recognize features on 3D CT surface reconstructions and match these with photographs, with implications for PHI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22065158      PMCID: PMC3348980          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-011-9429-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  4 in total

1.  The HIPAA privacy rule and protected health information: implications in research involving DICOM image databases.

Authors:  David T Fetzer; O Clark West
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.173

2.  HIPAA privacy and DICOM anonymization for research.

Authors:  David Avrin
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  FRVT 2006 and ICE 2006 large-scale experimental results.

Authors:  P Jonathon Phillips; W Todd Scruggs; Alice J O'Toole; Patrick J Flynn; Kevin W Bowyer; Cathy L Schott; Matthew Sharpe
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 4.  Three-dimensional surface imaging from CT scans for the study of craniofacial dysmorphology.

Authors:  J L Marsh; M W Vannier
Journal:  J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol       Date:  1989
  4 in total
  17 in total

1.  Challenges Related to Artificial Intelligence Research in Medical Imaging and the Importance of Image Analysis Competitions.

Authors:  Luciano M Prevedello; Safwan S Halabi; George Shih; Carol C Wu; Marc D Kohli; Falgun H Chokshi; Bradley J Erickson; Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer; Katherine P Andriole; Adam E Flanders
Journal:  Radiol Artif Intell       Date:  2019-01-30

2.  Identification of Anonymous MRI Research Participants with Face-Recognition Software.

Authors:  Christopher G Schwarz; Walter K Kremers; Terry M Therneau; Richard R Sharp; Jeffrey L Gunter; Prashanthi Vemuri; Arvin Arani; Anthony J Spychalla; Kejal Kantarci; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  What Are Important Ethical Implications of Using Facial Recognition Technology in Health Care?

Authors:  Nicole Martinez-Martin
Journal:  AMA J Ethics       Date:  2019-02-01

4.  Automated Facial Recognition of Computed Tomography-Derived Facial Images: Patient Privacy Implications.

Authors:  Connie L Parks; Keith L Monson
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 5.  Artificial Intelligence for Radiation Oncology Applications Using Public Datasets.

Authors:  Kareem A Wahid; Enrico Glerean; Jaakko Sahlsten; Joel Jaskari; Kimmo Kaski; Mohamed A Naser; Renjie He; Abdallah S R Mohamed; Clifton D Fuller
Journal:  Semin Radiat Oncol       Date:  2022-10       Impact factor: 5.421

6.  Obscuring surface anatomy in volumetric imaging data.

Authors:  Mikhail Milchenko; Daniel Marcus
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-01

7.  Changing the face of neuroimaging research: Comparing a new MRI de-facing technique with popular alternatives.

Authors:  Christopher G Schwarz; Walter K Kremers; Heather J Wiste; Jeffrey L Gunter; Prashanthi Vemuri; Anthony J Spychalla; Kejal Kantarci; Aaron P Schultz; Reisa A Sperling; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Clifford R Jack
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 7.400

Review 8.  Technical Challenges of Enterprise Imaging: HIMSS-SIIM Collaborative White Paper.

Authors:  David A Clunie; Don K Dennison; Dawn Cram; Kenneth R Persons; Mark D Bronkalla; Henri Rik Primo
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.056

9.  Image De-Identification Methods for Clinical Research in the XDS Environment.

Authors:  K Y E Aryanto; G van Kernebeek; B Berendsen; M Oudkerk; P M A van Ooijen
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 4.460

10.  Assessment of accuracy and recognition of three-dimensional computerized forensic craniofacial reconstruction.

Authors:  Geraldo Elias Miranda; Caroline Wilkinson; Mark Roughley; Thiago Leite Beaini; Rodolfo Francisco Haltenhoff Melani
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.