PURPOSE: To investigate the association of pre-radiotherapy apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormalities with patterns of recurrence and outcomes in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with recurrent GBM were retrospectively evaluated. Diffusion MRI images were acquired for all patients postoperatively prior to radiotherapy. ADC images were evaluated for geographic regions of diffusion restriction (hypointensity) within the FLAIR volume. If identified, the ADC map and the T1+C MRI at the time of recurrence were registered to the original plan to determine the pattern of recurrence and the coverage of the ADC abnormality by the 60 Gy isodose line (IDL). Progression-free and overall survival was determined for patients with and without an ADC hypointensity. RESULTS: An ADC hypointensity was identified in 32 (62%) of cases. The recurrence pattern in these cases was central in 27/32 (84%), marginal in 4/32 (13%) and distant in 1/32 (3%). The recurrence overlapped with the ADC hypointensity in 28 (88%) patients. The ADC hypointensity was covered by 95% of the 60 Gy IDL in all cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed inferior progression free survival and overall survival in patients with an ADC hypointensity compared to those without, despite similarities between the groups in terms of age, RT dose, performance status, and extent of resection. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an ADC hypointensity on pre-radiotherapy diffusion-weighted imaging is associated with the location of tumor recurrence as demonstrated by frequent overlap in this series, and is associated with a trend toward inferior outcomes. This abnormality may reflect a high risk region of hypercellularity and warrants consideration with respect to radiotherapy planning.
PURPOSE: To investigate the association of pre-radiotherapy apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) abnormalities with patterns of recurrence and outcomes in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients with recurrent GBM were retrospectively evaluated. Diffusion MRI images were acquired for all patients postoperatively prior to radiotherapy. ADC images were evaluated for geographic regions of diffusion restriction (hypointensity) within the FLAIR volume. If identified, the ADC map and the T1+C MRI at the time of recurrence were registered to the original plan to determine the pattern of recurrence and the coverage of the ADC abnormality by the 60 Gy isodose line (IDL). Progression-free and overall survival was determined for patients with and without an ADC hypointensity. RESULTS: An ADC hypointensity was identified in 32 (62%) of cases. The recurrence pattern in these cases was central in 27/32 (84%), marginal in 4/32 (13%) and distant in 1/32 (3%). The recurrence overlapped with the ADC hypointensity in 28 (88%) patients. The ADC hypointensity was covered by 95% of the 60 Gy IDL in all cases. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed inferior progression free survival and overall survival in patients with an ADC hypointensity compared to those without, despite similarities between the groups in terms of age, RT dose, performance status, and extent of resection. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of an ADC hypointensity on pre-radiotherapy diffusion-weighted imaging is associated with the location of tumor recurrence as demonstrated by frequent overlap in this series, and is associated with a trend toward inferior outcomes. This abnormality may reflect a high risk region of hypercellularity and warrants consideration with respect to radiotherapy planning.
Authors: T Sugahara; Y Korogi; M Kochi; I Ikushima; Y Shigematu; T Hirai; T Okuda; L Liang; Y Ge; Y Komohara; Y Ushio; M Takahashi Journal: J Magn Reson Imaging Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 4.813
Authors: Robert Cardinale; Minhee Won; Ali Choucair; Michael Gillin; Arnab Chakravarti; Christopher Schultz; Luis Souhami; Allan Chen; Huong Pham; Minesh Mehta Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-06-05 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Eric L Chang; Serap Akyurek; Tedde Avalos; Neal Rebueno; Chris Spicer; John Garcia; Robin Famiglietti; Pamela K Allen; K S Clifford Chao; Anita Mahajan; Shiao Y Woo; Moshe H Maor Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-02-15 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Yan Li; Janine M Lupo; Mei-Yin Polley; Jason C Crane; Wei Bian; Soonmee Cha; Susan Chang; Sarah J Nelson Journal: Neuro Oncol Date: 2011-02-04 Impact factor: 12.300
Authors: W B Pope; A Lai; R Mehta; H J Kim; J Qiao; J R Young; X Xue; J Goldin; M S Brown; P L Nghiemphu; A Tran; T F Cloughesy Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: June L Chan; Susan W Lee; Benedick A Fraass; Daniel P Normolle; Harry S Greenberg; Larry R Junck; Stephen S Gebarski; Howard M Sandler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2002-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roger Stupp; Monika E Hegi; Warren P Mason; Martin J van den Bent; Martin J B Taphoorn; Robert C Janzer; Samuel K Ludwin; Anouk Allgeier; Barbara Fisher; Karl Belanger; Peter Hau; Alba A Brandes; Johanna Gijtenbeek; Christine Marosi; Charles J Vecht; Karima Mokhtari; Pieter Wesseling; Salvador Villa; Elizabeth Eisenhauer; Thierry Gorlia; Michael Weller; Denis Lacombe; J Gregory Cairncross; René-Olivier Mirimanoff Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2009-03-09 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Amir Zolal; Tareq A Juratli; Jennifer Linn; Dino Podlesek; Kerim Hakan Sitoci Ficici; Hagen H Kitzler; Gabriele Schackert; Stephan B Sobottka; Bernhard Rieger; Dietmar Krex Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2016-01-30 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Comron Hassanzadeh; Yuan James Rao; Anupama Chundury; Jackson Rowe; Maria Rosana Ponisio; Akash Sharma; Michelle Miller-Thomas; Christina I Tsien; Joseph E Ippolito Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2017-08-18 Impact factor: 6.244