Richard J Holden1. 1. Departments of Medicine and Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, USA. richard.holden@vanderbilt.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: For electronic health record (EHR) systems to have a positive impact on patient safety, clinicians must be able to use these systems effectively after they are made available. This study's objective is to identify and describe facilitators and barriers to physicians' use of EHR systems. METHODS: Twenty research interviews were conducted with attending physicians who were using EHR at 1 of 2 Midwest community hospitals and/or at their respective outpatient clinics. RESULTS: Analyses yielded more than 200 perceived facilitators and barriers, comprising 19 distinct categories. Categories of facilitators/barriers related to user attribute included learning, typing proficiency, understanding the EHR system, motivation/initiative, and strategies/workarounds. Categories related to system attributes were supporting hardware/software and system speed, functionality, and usability. Categories related to support from others were formal technical support, formal training, and informal support from colleagues. Categories of organizational facilitators/barriers were time allowance and interinstitutional integration. Categories of environmental facilitators/barriers were physical space, electricity, wireless connectivity, and the social environment. CONCLUSIONS: Together, the broad set of discovered facilitators and barriers confirms and expands prior research on the facilitators and barriers to health information technology use. The depth of reported information on each facilitator and barrier made possible by qualitative interview methods contributes to the theoretical understanding of facilitators and barriers to EHR use. Equally as important, this study provides an information base from which relevant policy and design interventions can be launched to improve the use of EHR systems and, thus, patient safety.
OBJECTIVES: For electronic health record (EHR) systems to have a positive impact on patient safety, clinicians must be able to use these systems effectively after they are made available. This study's objective is to identify and describe facilitators and barriers to physicians' use of EHR systems. METHODS: Twenty research interviews were conducted with attending physicians who were using EHR at 1 of 2 Midwest community hospitals and/or at their respective outpatient clinics. RESULTS: Analyses yielded more than 200 perceived facilitators and barriers, comprising 19 distinct categories. Categories of facilitators/barriers related to user attribute included learning, typing proficiency, understanding the EHR system, motivation/initiative, and strategies/workarounds. Categories related to system attributes were supporting hardware/software and system speed, functionality, and usability. Categories related to support from others were formal technical support, formal training, and informal support from colleagues. Categories of organizational facilitators/barriers were time allowance and interinstitutional integration. Categories of environmental facilitators/barriers were physical space, electricity, wireless connectivity, and the social environment. CONCLUSIONS: Together, the broad set of discovered facilitators and barriers confirms and expands prior research on the facilitators and barriers to health information technology use. The depth of reported information on each facilitator and barrier made possible by qualitative interview methods contributes to the theoretical understanding of facilitators and barriers to EHR use. Equally as important, this study provides an information base from which relevant policy and design interventions can be launched to improve the use of EHR systems and, thus, patient safety.
Authors: Emily M Campbell; Dean F Sittig; Joan S Ash; Kenneth P Guappone; Richard H Dykstra Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2006-06-23 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Steven R Simon; Christine S Soran; Rainu Kaushal; Chelsea A Jenter; Lynn A Volk; Elisabeth Burdick; Paul D Cleary; E John Orav; Eric G Poon; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2009-04-23 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Emily S Patterson; Bradley N Doebbeling; Constance H Fung; Laura Militello; Shilo Anders; Steven M Asch Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2004-12-15 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Ross Koppel; Joshua P Metlay; Abigail Cohen; Brian Abaluck; A Russell Localio; Stephen E Kimmel; Brian L Strom Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-03-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jeffrey I Campbell; Isaac Aturinda; Evans Mwesigwa; Bridget Burns; Data Santorino; Jessica E Haberer; David R Bangsberg; Richard J Holden; Norma C Ware; Mark J Siedner Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2017-11
Authors: M Tariq Dastagir; Homer L Chin; Michael McNamara; Kathy Poteraj; Sarah Battaglini; Lauren Alstot Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2012-11-03
Authors: John Wenskovitch; Brett Jefferson; Alexander Anderson; Jessica Baweja; Danielle Ciesielski; Corey Fallon Journal: Front Big Data Date: 2022-06-14
Authors: Blackford Middleton; Meryl Bloomrosen; Mark A Dente; Bill Hashmat; Ross Koppel; J Marc Overhage; Thomas H Payne; S Trent Rosenbloom; Charlotte Weaver; Jiajie Zhang Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-01-25 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Richard J Holden; Pascale Carayon; Ayse P Gurses; Peter Hoonakker; Ann Schoofs Hundt; A Ant Ozok; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez Journal: Ergonomics Date: 2013-10-03 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Pascale Carayon; Tosha B Wetterneck; A Joy Rivera-Rodriguez; Ann Schoofs Hundt; Peter Hoonakker; Richard Holden; Ayse P Gurses Journal: Appl Ergon Date: 2013-07-08 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Seyram A Butame; Jessica M De Leon; Sung-Jae Lee; Sylvie Naar; Leah Genn; Tyra Dark; Bill G Kapogiannis Journal: Eval Health Prof Date: 2021-03-04 Impact factor: 2.329