Literature DB >> 22064481

Mechanistic basis for RAG discrimination between recombination sites and the off-target sites of human lymphomas.

Noriko Shimazaki1, Amjad Askary, Patrick C Swanson, Michael R Lieber.   

Abstract

During V(D)J recombination, RAG targeting to correct sites versus off-target sites relies on both DNA sequence features and on chromatin marks. Kinetic analysis using the first highly active full-length purified RAG1/RAG2 complexes has now allowed us to define the important catalytic features of this complex. We found that the overall rate of nicking, but not hairpinning, is critical for the discrimination between correct (optimal) versus off-target (suboptimal) sites used in human T-cell lymphomas, and we show that the C-terminal portion of RAG2 is required for this. This type of kinetic analysis permits us to analyze only the catalytically active RAG complex, in contrast to all other methods, which are unavoidably confounded by mixture with inactive RAG complexes. Moreover, we can distinguish the two major features of any enzymatic catalysis: the binding constant (K(D)) and the catalytic turnover rate, k(cat). Beyond a minimal essential threshold of heptamer quality, further suboptimal heptamer deviations primarily reduce the catalytic rate constant k(cat) for nicking. Suboptimal nonamers reduce not only the binding of the RAG complex to the recombination site (K(D)) but also the catalytic rate constant, consistent with a tight interaction between the RAG complex and substrate during catalysis. These features explain many aspects of RAG physiology and pathophysiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22064481      PMCID: PMC3255787          DOI: 10.1128/MCB.06187-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  46 in total

1.  The C-terminal portion of RAG2 protects against transposition in vitro.

Authors:  Sheryl K Elkin; Adam G Matthews; Marjorie A Oettinger
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2003-04-15       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  A RAG-1/RAG-2 tetramer supports 12/23-regulated synapsis, cleavage, and transposition of V(D)J recombination signals.

Authors:  Patrick C Swanson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 3.  The bounty of RAGs: recombination signal complexes and reaction outcomes.

Authors:  Patrick C Swanson
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 4.  Regulation of immunoglobulin heavy-chain gene rearrangements.

Authors:  Dipanjan Chowdhury; Ranjan Sen
Journal:  Immunol Rev       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 12.988

Review 5.  Mechanisms for feedback inhibition of the immunoglobulin heavy chain locus.

Authors:  Dipanjan Chowdhury; Ranjan Sen
Journal:  Curr Opin Immunol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 7.486

6.  Full-length RAG-2, and not full-length RAG-1, specifically suppresses RAG-mediated transposition but not hybrid joint formation or disintegration.

Authors:  Patrick C Swanson; Dustin Volkmer; Lei Wang
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2003-11-11       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Site-specific recombination in the immune system.

Authors:  M R Lieber
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  RAG1-DNA binding in V(D)J recombination. Specificity and DNA-induced conformational changes revealed by fluorescence and CD spectroscopy.

Authors:  Mihai Ciubotaru; Leon M Ptaszek; Gary A Baker; Sheila N Baker; Frank V Bright; David G Schatz
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2002-12-17       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 9.  V(D)J recombination: mechanisms of initiation.

Authors:  David G Schatz; Patrick C Swanson
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 16.830

10.  V(D)J recombination: a functional definition of the joining signals.

Authors:  J E Hesse; M R Lieber; K Mizuuchi; M Gellert
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.361

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Histone methylation and V(D)J recombination.

Authors:  Noriko Shimazaki; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 2.490

2.  An interdomain boundary in RAG1 facilitates cooperative binding to RAG2 in formation of the V(D)J recombinase complex.

Authors:  Jennifer N Byrum; Shuying Zhao; Negar S Rahman; Lori M Gwyn; William Rodgers; Karla K Rodgers
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  An autoregulatory mechanism imposes allosteric control on the V(D)J recombinase by histone H3 methylation.

Authors:  Chao Lu; Alyssa Ward; John Bettridge; Yun Liu; Stephen Desiderio
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 9.423

4.  Modeling of the RAG reaction mechanism.

Authors:  Amjad Askary; Noriko Shimazaki; Niki Bayat; Michael R Lieber
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 9.423

5.  Real-time monitoring of RAG-catalyzed DNA cleavage unveils dynamic changes in coding end association with the coding end complex.

Authors:  Guannan Wang; Kajari Dhar; Patrick C Swanson; Marcia Levitus; Yung Chang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Two Mutually Exclusive Local Chromatin States Drive Efficient V(D)J Recombination.

Authors:  Daniel J Bolland; Hashem Koohy; Andrew L Wood; Louise S Matheson; Felix Krueger; Michael J T Stubbington; Amanda Baizan-Edge; Peter Chovanec; Bryony A Stubbs; Kristina Tabbada; Simon R Andrews; Mikhail Spivakov; Anne E Corcoran
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 9.423

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.