Literature DB >> 22062770

Genomic imbalances in endometrial adenocarcinomas - comparison of DNA ploidy, karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization.

Wanja Kildal1, Francesca Micci, Bjørn Risberg, Vera M Abeler, Gunnar B Kristensen, Sverre Heim, Håvard E Danielsen.   

Abstract

DNA ploidy analysis is useful for prognostication in cancer patients, but the genomic details underlying ploidy changes are not fully understood. To improve this understanding, we compared DNA ploidy status with karyotypic and comparative genomic hybridization data on 51 endometrial adenocarcinomas. Out of 34 DNA diploid tumors evaluated by CGH, 16 (47%) showed imbalances, though only two had more than four copy number changes. Ten (29%) had aberrations involving chromosome 1, seven (21%) involving chromosome 10, while one tumor had a chromosome 8 aberration. Four of the seven DNA tetraploid tumors (57%) had imbalances detected by CGH with two (29%) having more than four. Six out of eight DNA aneuploid tumors showed imbalances by CGH, with five (63%) having more than four. The aberrations were observed on chromosomes 1 and 8 in five/eight (63%) cases while four imbalances (50%) involved chromosomes 5, 7 and X. Not surprisingly, we observed a significant correlation between increasing DNA ploidy complexity and increasing number of copy alterations. Gains of material from chromosomes 8 and 7 might be specifically correlated to DNA aneuploidy in endometrial adenocarcinomas since 63% and 50% of the aneuploid compared to 3% of the diploid tumors showed imbalances involving these chromosomes.
Copyright © 2011 Federation of European Biochemical Societies. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22062770      PMCID: PMC5528382          DOI: 10.1016/j.molonc.2011.10.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Oncol        ISSN: 1574-7891            Impact factor:   6.603


  27 in total

1.  The frequency of p53, K-ras mutations, and microsatellite instability differs in uterine endometrioid and serous carcinoma: evidence of distinct molecular genetic pathways.

Authors:  S F Lax; B Kendall; H Tashiro; R J Slebos; L Hedrick
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2000-02-15       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Flow cytometric DNA analysis of stage I endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  L C Britton; T O Wilson; T A Gaffey; M M Lieber; H S Wieand; K C Podratz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Mutational inactivation of STAG2 causes aneuploidy in human cancer.

Authors:  David A Solomon; Taeyeon Kim; Laura A Diaz-Martinez; Joshlean Fair; Abdel G Elkahloun; Brent T Harris; Jeffrey A Toretsky; Steven A Rosenberg; Neerav Shukla; Marc Ladanyi; Yardena Samuels; C David James; Hongtao Yu; Jung-Sik Kim; Todd Waldman
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Ten-year results of a prospective study on the prognostic role of ploidy in endometrial carcinoma: dNA aneuploidy identifies high-risk cases among the so-called 'low-risk' patients with well and moderately differentiated tumors.

Authors:  Tommaso Susini; Gianni Amunni; Cecilia Molino; Carlo Carriero; Stefano Rapi; Francesco Branconi; Mauro Marchionni; Gianluigi Taddei; Gianfranco Scarselli
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Evaluation of genomic changes in a large series of malignant ovarian germ cell tumors--relation to clinicopathologic variables.

Authors:  Wanja Kildal; Janne Kaern; Sigrid Marie Kraggerud; Vera M Abeler; Jon Sudbø; Claes G Tropè; Ragnhild A Lothe; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Cancer Genet Cytogenet       Date:  2004-11

6.  Detection of DNA gains and losses in primary endometrial carcinomas by comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  G Sonoda; S du Manoir; A K Godwin; D W Bell; Z Liu; M Hogan; M Yakushiji; J R Testa
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 5.006

7.  Overrepresentation of 8q in carcinosarcomas and endometrial adenocarcinomas.

Authors:  Hans-Jürgen Schulten; Bastian Gunawan; Christina Enders; Konrad Donhuijsen; Günter Emons; László Füzesi
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.493

8.  DNA ploidy, morphometry, and nuclear grade as prognostic factors in endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  B Sorbe; B Risberg; B Frankendal
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.482

9.  Genomic aberrations in carcinomas of the uterine corpus.

Authors:  Francesca Micci; Manuel R Teixeira; Lisbeth Haugom; Gunnar Kristensen; Vera M Abeler; Sverre Heim
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.006

10.  Prognostic significance of proliferation in endometrial adenocarcinomas: a multivariate analysis of clinical and flow cytometric variables.

Authors:  U Stendahl; P Strang; G Wagenius; R Bergström; B Tribukait
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Pathol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.762

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genomic imbalances in endometrial adenocarcinomas - comparison of DNA ploidy, karyotyping and comparative genomic hybridization.

Authors:  Wanja Kildal; Francesca Micci; Bjørn Risberg; Vera M Abeler; Gunnar B Kristensen; Sverre Heim; Håvard E Danielsen
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 6.603

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.