Literature DB >> 2206087

Occlusive dressings: a microbiologic and clinical review.

J J Hutchinson1, M McGuckin.   

Abstract

This review discusses the microbiology of normal skin and wounds and examines the rates of infection reported under both conventional (nonocclusive) dressings and all occlusive dressings, together with cost factors. The overall infection rate under conventional dressings was 7.1% in 1085 wounds, whereas under occlusive dressings on 3047 wounds the rate was 2.6%. In studies in which the two dressing types were directly compared, the respective rates were 7.6% and 3.2%. The reasons for this difference may include both dressing-specific and host-specific factors, and these factors are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2206087     DOI: 10.1016/0196-6553(90)90167-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Infect Control        ISSN: 0196-6553            Impact factor:   2.918


  24 in total

1.  Postoperative care of the facial laceration.

Authors:  Nicholas Medel; Neeraj Panchal; Edward Ellis
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2010-12

Review 2.  Development of an evidence-based protocol for care of pilonidal sinus wounds healing by secondary intent using a modified reactive Delphi procedure. Part one: the literature review*.

Authors:  Connie L Harris; Samantha Holloway
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2011-10-17       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 3.  Wet-to-Dry Dressings Do Not Provide Moist Wound Healing.

Authors:  Aaron J Wodash
Journal:  J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec       Date:  2013-09-22

Review 4.  Interactive wound dressings. A practical guide to their use in older patients.

Authors:  C Hansson
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 5.  The use of gauze: will it ever change?

Authors:  Vanessa J Jones
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.315

6.  A closer examination of atraumatic dressings for optimal healing.

Authors:  Stephen C Davis; Jie Li; Joel Gil; Jose Valdes; Michael Solis; Ryan Treu; Robert S Kirnser
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 7.  Clinical Biofilms: A Challenging Frontier in Wound Care.

Authors:  Jennifer Hurlow; Kara Couch; Karen Laforet; Laura Bolton; Daniel Metcalf; Phil Bowler
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  A comparison of the in vitro moisture vapour transmission rate and in vivo fluid-handling capacity of six adhesive foam dressings to a newly reformulated adhesive foam dressing.

Authors:  Cindy L Zehrer; David Holm; Staci E Solfest; Shelley-Ann Walters
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2013-01-30       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 9.  National Athletic Trainers' Association Position Statement: Management of Acute Skin Trauma.

Authors:  Joel W Beam; Bernadette Buckley; William R Holcomb; Mario Ciocca
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 10.  Quality Randomized Clinical Trials of Topical Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing Agents.

Authors:  Laura L Bolton
Journal:  Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle)       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 4.730

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.