Literature DB >> 22058330

Binocular coordination during reading of blurred and nonblurred text.

Stephanie Jainta1, Anne Dehnert, Sven P Heinrich, Wolfgang Jaschinski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Reading a text requires vergence angle adjustments, so that the images in the two eyes fall on corresponding retinal areas. Vergence adjustments bring the two retinal images into Panum's fusional area and therefore, small remaining errors or regulations do not lead to double vision. The present study evaluated dynamic and static aspects of the binocular coordination when upcoming text was blurred.
METHODS: Binocular eye movements and accommodation responses were simultaneously measured for 20 participants while reading single, nonblurred sentences and while the text was blurred as if it were seen by a person in whom the combination of refraction and accommodation deviated from the stimulus plane by 0.5 D.
RESULTS: Text comprehension did not change, even though fixation times increased for reading blurred sentences. The disconjugacy during saccades was also not affected by blurred text presentations, but the vergence adjustment during fixations was reduced. Further, for blurred text, the overall vergence angle shifted in the exo direction, and this shift correlated with the individual heterophoria. Accommodation measures showed that the lag of accommodation was slightly larger for reading blurred sentences and that the shift in vergence angle was larger when the individual lag of accommodation was also larger.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that reading comprehension is robust against changes in binocular coordination that result from moderate text degradation; nevertheless, these changes are likely to be linked to the development of fatigue and visual strain in near reading conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22058330     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.11-8237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  6 in total

1.  Effects of Prism Eyeglasses on Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity.

Authors:  Volkhard Schroth; Roland Joos; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Individual Objective and Subjective Fixation Disparity in Near Vision.

Authors:  Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Visual fatigue during control room work in process industries.

Authors:  Susanne Glimne; Rune Brautaset; Cecilia Österman
Journal:  Work       Date:  2020

4.  Binocular advantages in reading revisited: attenuating effects of individual horizontal heterophoria.

Authors:  Stephanie Jainta; Joëlle Joss
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 0.957

5.  Do standard optometric measures predict binocular coordination during reading?

Authors:  Joëlle Joss; Stephanie Jainta
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 0.957

6.  Synchronization of a Removable Optical Element with an Eye Tracker: Test Case for Heterophoria Measurement.

Authors:  Liat Gantz; Avi Caspi
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 3.283

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.