BACKGROUND:Thalidomide is active in multiple myeloma and is associated with minimal myelosuppression, making it a good candidate for induction therapy prior to high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Oral cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone was compared with infusional cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. RESULTS: The post-induction overall response rate (≥ partial response) for the intent-to-treat population was significantly higher with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone (n=555) versus cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (n=556); 82.5% versus 71.2%; odds ratio 1.91; 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.55; P<0.0001. The complete response rates were 13.0% with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone and 8.1% with cyclophos-phamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (P=0.0083), with this differential response being maintained in patients who received autologous stem-cell transplantation (post-transplant complete response 50.0% versus 37.2%, respectively; P=0.00052). Cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone was non-inferior to cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone for progression-free and overall survival, and there was a trend toward a late survival benefit with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone in responders. A trend toward an overall survival advantage for cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone over cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone was also observed in a subgroup of patients with favorable interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Compared with cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone was associated with more constipation and somnolence, but a lower incidence of cytopenias. CONCLUSIONS: The cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone regimen showed improved response rates and was not inferior in terms of survival outcomes to the standard infusional regimen of cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone. Based on its oral administration and the reduced incidence of infection and cytopenia, cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexa-methasone may be considered an effective induction therapy option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (ISRCTN: 68454111).
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND:Thalidomide is active in multiple myeloma and is associated with minimal myelosuppression, making it a good candidate for induction therapy prior to high-dose therapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation. DESIGN AND METHODS: Oral cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone was compared with infusional cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. RESULTS: The post-induction overall response rate (≥ partial response) for the intent-to-treat population was significantly higher with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone (n=555) versus cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (n=556); 82.5% versus 71.2%; odds ratio 1.91; 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.55; P<0.0001. The complete response rates were 13.0% with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone and 8.1% with cyclophos-phamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (P=0.0083), with this differential response being maintained in patients who received autologous stem-cell transplantation (post-transplant complete response 50.0% versus 37.2%, respectively; P=0.00052). Cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone was non-inferior to cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone for progression-free and overall survival, and there was a trend toward a late survival benefit with cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone in responders. A trend toward an overall survival advantage for cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone over cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone was also observed in a subgroup of patients with favorable interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. Compared with cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone was associated with more constipation and somnolence, but a lower incidence of cytopenias. CONCLUSIONS: The cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexamethasone regimen showed improved response rates and was not inferior in terms of survival outcomes to the standard infusional regimen of cyclophosphamide-vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone. Based on its oral administration and the reduced incidence of infection and cytopenia, cyclophosphamide-thalidomide-dexa-methasone may be considered an effective induction therapy option for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. (ISRCTN: 68454111).
Authors: N Raje; R Powles; S Kulkarni; S Milan; G Middleton; S Singhal; J Mehta; B Millar; C Viner; J Raymond; J Treleaven; D Cunningham; M Gore Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: B G M Durie; J-L Harousseau; J S Miguel; J Bladé; B Barlogie; K Anderson; M Gertz; M Dimopoulos; J Westin; P Sonneveld; H Ludwig; G Gahrton; M Beksac; J Crowley; A Belch; M Boccadaro; M Cavo; I Turesson; D Joshua; D Vesole; R Kyle; R Alexanian; G Tricot; M Attal; G Merlini; R Powles; P Richardson; K Shimizu; P Tosi; G Morgan; S V Rajkumar Journal: Leukemia Date: 2006-07-20 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Ping Wu; Faith E Davies; Clive Horton; Matthew W Jenner; Biju Krishnan; Caroline L Alvares; Radovan Saso; Rita McCormack; Sharon Dines; Jennifer G Treleaven; Michael N Potter; Mark E Ethell; Gareth J Morgan Journal: Leuk Lymphoma Date: 2006-11
Authors: J Anthony Child; Gareth J Morgan; Faith E Davies; Roger G Owen; Susan E Bell; Kim Hawkins; Julia Brown; Mark T Drayson; Peter J Selby Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-05-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Bart Barlogie; Guido Tricot; Elias Anaissie; John Shaughnessy; Erik Rasmussen; Frits van Rhee; Athanasios Fassas; Maurizio Zangari; Klaus Hollmig; Mauricio Pineda-Roman; Choon Lee; Giampaolo Talamo; Raymond Thertulien; Elias Kiwan; Somashekar Krishna; Michele Fox; John Crowley Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2006-03-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J Bladé; D Samson; D Reece; J Apperley; B Björkstrand; G Gahrton; M Gertz; S Giralt; S Jagannath; D Vesole Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 1998-09 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: K D Boyd; F M Ross; L Chiecchio; G P Dagrada; Z J Konn; W J Tapper; B A Walker; C P Wardell; W M Gregory; A J Szubert; S E Bell; J A Child; G H Jackson; F E Davies; G J Morgan Journal: Leukemia Date: 2011-08-12 Impact factor: 11.528
Authors: Enrico Caserta; Junie Chea; Megan Minnix; Erasmus K Poku; Domenico Viola; Steven Vonderfecht; Paul Yazaki; Desiree Crow; Jihane Khalife; James F Sanchez; Joycelynne M Palmer; Susanta Hui; Nadia Carlesso; Jonathan Keats; Young Kim; Ralf Buettner; Guido Marcucci; Steven Rosen; John Shively; David Colcher; Amrita Krishnan; Flavia Pichiorri Journal: Blood Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: H Ludwig; J S Miguel; M A Dimopoulos; A Palumbo; R Garcia Sanz; R Powles; S Lentzsch; W Ming Chen; J Hou; A Jurczyszyn; K Romeril; R Hajek; E Terpos; K Shimizu; D Joshua; V Hungria; A Rodriguez Morales; D Ben-Yehuda; P Sondergeld; E Zamagni; B Durie Journal: Leukemia Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 11.528