PURPOSE: To determine if thalidomide plus dexamethasone yields superior response rates compared with dexamethasone alone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive thalidomide plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone. Patients in arm A received thalidomide 200 mg orally for 4 weeks; dexamethasone was administered at a dose of 40 mg orally on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients in arm B received dexamethasone alone at the same schedule as in arm A. RESULTS:Two hundred seven patients were enrolled: 103 were randomly assigned to thalidomide plus dexamethasone and 104 were randomly assigned to dexamethasone alone; eight patients were ineligible. The response rate with thalidomide plus dexamethasone was significantly higher than with dexamethasone alone (63% v 41%, respectively; P = .0017). The response rate allowing for use of serum monoclonal protein levels when a measurable urine monoclonal protein was unavailable at follow-up was 72% v 50%, respectively. The incidence rates of grade 3 or higher deep vein thrombosis (DVT), rash, bradycardia, neuropathy, and any grade 4 to 5 toxicity in the first 4 months were significantly higher with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone (45% v 21%, respectively; P < .001). DVT was more frequent in arm A than in arm B (17% v 3%); grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was also more frequent (7% v 4%, respectively). CONCLUSION:Thalidomide plus dexamethasone demonstrates significantly superior response rates in newly diagnosed myeloma compared with dexamethasone alone. However, this must be balanced against the greater toxicity seen with the combination.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To determine if thalidomide plus dexamethasone yields superior response rates compared with dexamethasone alone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive thalidomide plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone. Patients in arm A received thalidomide 200 mg orally for 4 weeks; dexamethasone was administered at a dose of 40 mg orally on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients in arm B received dexamethasone alone at the same schedule as in arm A. RESULTS: Two hundred seven patients were enrolled: 103 were randomly assigned to thalidomide plus dexamethasone and 104 were randomly assigned to dexamethasone alone; eight patients were ineligible. The response rate with thalidomide plus dexamethasone was significantly higher than with dexamethasone alone (63% v 41%, respectively; P = .0017). The response rate allowing for use of serum monoclonal protein levels when a measurable urine monoclonal protein was unavailable at follow-up was 72% v 50%, respectively. The incidence rates of grade 3 or higher deep vein thrombosis (DVT), rash, bradycardia, neuropathy, and any grade 4 to 5 toxicity in the first 4 months were significantly higher with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone (45% v 21%, respectively; P < .001). DVT was more frequent in arm A than in arm B (17% v 3%); grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was also more frequent (7% v 4%, respectively). CONCLUSION:Thalidomide plus dexamethasone demonstrates significantly superior response rates in newly diagnosed myeloma compared with dexamethasone alone. However, this must be balanced against the greater toxicity seen with the combination.
Authors: Pieter Sonneveld; Emilie Asselbergs; Sonja Zweegman; Bronno van der Holt; Marie Jose Kersten; Edo Vellenga; Marinus van Marwijk-Kooy; Annemiek Broyl; Okke de Weerdt; Sarah Lonergan; Antonio Palumbo; Henk Lokhorst Journal: Blood Date: 2014-11-14 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Hakan Kaya; Benjamin Peressini; Irfan Jawed; Danko Martincic; Ameer L Elaimy; Wayne T Lamoreaux; Robert K Fairbanks; Kevin A Weeks; Christopher M Lee Journal: Int J Hematol Date: 2011-12-09 Impact factor: 2.490
Authors: Shaji K Kumar; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Keith Stewart; Francis K Buadi; Jacob Allred; Kristina Laumann; Philip R Greipp; John A Lust; Morie A Gertz; Steven R Zeldenrust; P Leif Bergsagel; Craig B Reeder; Thomas E Witzig; Rafael Fonseca; Stephen J Russell; Joseph R Mikhael; David Dingli; S Vincent Rajkumar; Angela Dispenzieri Journal: Am J Hematol Date: 2011-05-31 Impact factor: 10.047
Authors: Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Dominik Dytfeld; Kent A Griffith; Daniel Lebovic; David H Vesole; Sundar Jagannath; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Tara Anderson; Brian Nordgren; Kristen Detweiler-Short; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Asra Ahmed; Terri Jobkar; Diane E Durecki; Kathryn McDonnell; Melissa Mietzel; Daniel Couriel; Mark Kaminski; Ravi Vij Journal: Blood Date: 2012-06-04 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Francesca Gay; Suzanne R Hayman; Martha Q Lacy; Francis Buadi; Morie A Gertz; Shaji Kumar; Angela Dispenzieri; Joseph R Mikhael; P Leif Bergsagel; David Dingli; Craig B Reeder; John A Lust; Stephen J Russell; Vivek Roy; Steven R Zeldenrust; Thomas E Witzig; Rafael Fonseca; Robert A Kyle; Philip R Greipp; A Keith Stewart; S Vincent Rajkumar Journal: Blood Date: 2009-12-11 Impact factor: 22.113