Literature DB >> 16365178

Phase III clinical trial of thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a clinical trial coordinated by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

S Vincent Rajkumar1, Emily Blood, David Vesole, Rafael Fonseca, Philip R Greipp.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if thalidomide plus dexamethasone yields superior response rates compared with dexamethasone alone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive thalidomide plus dexamethasone or dexamethasone alone. Patients in arm A received thalidomide 200 mg orally for 4 weeks; dexamethasone was administered at a dose of 40 mg orally on days 1 to 4, 9 to 12, and 17 to 20. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients in arm B received dexamethasone alone at the same schedule as in arm A.
RESULTS: Two hundred seven patients were enrolled: 103 were randomly assigned to thalidomide plus dexamethasone and 104 were randomly assigned to dexamethasone alone; eight patients were ineligible. The response rate with thalidomide plus dexamethasone was significantly higher than with dexamethasone alone (63% v 41%, respectively; P = .0017). The response rate allowing for use of serum monoclonal protein levels when a measurable urine monoclonal protein was unavailable at follow-up was 72% v 50%, respectively. The incidence rates of grade 3 or higher deep vein thrombosis (DVT), rash, bradycardia, neuropathy, and any grade 4 to 5 toxicity in the first 4 months were significantly higher with thalidomide plus dexamethasone compared with dexamethasone alone (45% v 21%, respectively; P < .001). DVT was more frequent in arm A than in arm B (17% v 3%); grade 3 or higher peripheral neuropathy was also more frequent (7% v 4%, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Thalidomide plus dexamethasone demonstrates significantly superior response rates in newly diagnosed myeloma compared with dexamethasone alone. However, this must be balanced against the greater toxicity seen with the combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16365178     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.0221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  207 in total

1.  Phase 2 study of carfilzomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction/consolidation therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Pieter Sonneveld; Emilie Asselbergs; Sonja Zweegman; Bronno van der Holt; Marie Jose Kersten; Edo Vellenga; Marinus van Marwijk-Kooy; Annemiek Broyl; Okke de Weerdt; Sarah Lonergan; Antonio Palumbo; Henk Lokhorst
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 22.113

2.  Impact of age, race and decade of treatment on overall survival in a critical population analysis of 40,000 multiple myeloma patients.

Authors:  Hakan Kaya; Benjamin Peressini; Irfan Jawed; Danko Martincic; Ameer L Elaimy; Wayne T Lamoreaux; Robert K Fairbanks; Kevin A Weeks; Christopher M Lee
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2011-12-09       Impact factor: 2.490

3.  Lenalidomide, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone (CRd) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: results from a phase 2 trial.

Authors:  Shaji K Kumar; Martha Q Lacy; Suzanne R Hayman; Keith Stewart; Francis K Buadi; Jacob Allred; Kristina Laumann; Philip R Greipp; John A Lust; Morie A Gertz; Steven R Zeldenrust; P Leif Bergsagel; Craig B Reeder; Thomas E Witzig; Rafael Fonseca; Stephen J Russell; Joseph R Mikhael; David Dingli; S Vincent Rajkumar; Angela Dispenzieri
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 10.047

Review 4.  Pulmonary toxicities from targeted therapies: a review.

Authors:  Nicholas A Barber; Apar Kishor Ganti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 4.493

5.  A phase 1/2 study of carfilzomib in combination with lenalidomide and low-dose dexamethasone as a frontline treatment for multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrzej J Jakubowiak; Dominik Dytfeld; Kent A Griffith; Daniel Lebovic; David H Vesole; Sundar Jagannath; Ammar Al-Zoubi; Tara Anderson; Brian Nordgren; Kristen Detweiler-Short; Keith Stockerl-Goldstein; Asra Ahmed; Terri Jobkar; Diane E Durecki; Kathryn McDonnell; Melissa Mietzel; Daniel Couriel; Mark Kaminski; Ravi Vij
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Thrombosis and cancer.

Authors:  Annie Young; Oliver Chapman; Carole Connor; Christopher Poole; Peter Rose; Ajay K Kakkar
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  An Overview of Cancer Drugs Approved by the US Food and Drug Administration Based on the Surrogate End Point of Response Rate.

Authors:  Emerson Y Chen; Vikram Raghunathan; Vinay Prasad
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Multiple myeloma: an update.

Authors:  Khalil Al-Farsi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2013-01

Review 9.  Lenalidomide in myeloma.

Authors:  Seema Singhal; Jayesh Mehta
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2007-04

10.  Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone versus thalidomide plus dexamethasone in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: a comparative analysis of 411 patients.

Authors:  Francesca Gay; Suzanne R Hayman; Martha Q Lacy; Francis Buadi; Morie A Gertz; Shaji Kumar; Angela Dispenzieri; Joseph R Mikhael; P Leif Bergsagel; David Dingli; Craig B Reeder; John A Lust; Stephen J Russell; Vivek Roy; Steven R Zeldenrust; Thomas E Witzig; Rafael Fonseca; Robert A Kyle; Philip R Greipp; A Keith Stewart; S Vincent Rajkumar
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 22.113

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.