Literature DB >> 22057353

Gender difference of the femoral kinematics axis location and its relation to anterior cruciate ligament injury: a 3D-CT study.

Yuichi Hoshino1, Joon Ho Wang, Stephan Lorenz, Freddie H Fu, Scott Tashman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The variation of distal femur morphology has been often reported, especially in relation to ACL injury. However, it remains unknown how morphological differences affect knee kinematics and ACL function. The location of the transcondylar axis, a common anatomical reference line, may be a significant aspect of morphological variation. It was hypothesized that the location of this axis would be different between genders, and between ACL-injured and non-injured subjects.
METHODS: 3D CT scans of contralateral healthy femurs in 38 unilateral soft tissue injured patients (20 men/18 women, 26 ACL injury/12 non-ACL injury (7 with PCL injuries and 5 with medial meniscus root tears)) were analyzed three-dimensionally. Condyle offset was calculated as the distance between the transcondylar axis and the anatomical axis of the femur. Condyle offset ratio (COR) was then calculated by dividing the condyle offset by the condyle radius. Gender and ACL-injured and non-injured group differences were assessed.
RESULTS: Larger COR was found in women, 1.10 ± 0.14, than men, 0.96 ± 0.08. In women, the ACL-injured group had significantly larger COR than the non-ACL injury group, but no difference was found in men.
CONCLUSION: COR is a unique morphological feature which is measureable from 3D CT. COR is larger in women, and could be a possible risk indicator for ACL injury in the female population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22057353     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-011-1738-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  46 in total

1.  The Ranawat Award. Femoral component rotation during total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  C W Olcott; R D Scott
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL)-deficient weightbearing, living knee employing vertical access open "interventional" multiple resonance imaging.

Authors:  Martin Logan; Edward Dunstan; James Robinson; Andrew Williams; Wady Gedroyc; Michael Freeman
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 3.  Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 1, mechanisms and risk factors.

Authors:  Timothy E Hewett; Gregory D Myer; Kevin R Ford
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.202

4.  Sex-based differences in the anthropometric characteristics of the anterior cruciate ligament and its relation to intercondylar notch geometry: a cadaveric study.

Authors:  Naveen Chandrashekar; James Slauterbeck; Javad Hashemi
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07-11       Impact factor: 6.202

5.  Anterior cruciate ligament and intercondylar notch in the coronal oblique plane: anatomy complemented by magnetic resonance imaging in cruciate ligament-intact knees.

Authors:  H U Staeubli; O Adam; W Becker; R Burgkart
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.772

6.  A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee.

Authors:  E S Grood; W J Suntay
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  1983-05       Impact factor: 2.097

7.  Tibiofemoral movement 2: the loaded and unloaded living knee studied by MRI.

Authors:  P F Hill; V Vedi; A Williams; H Iwaki; V Pinskerova; M A Freeman
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2000-11

8.  Tibio-femoral movement in the living knee. A study of weight bearing and non-weight bearing knee kinematics using 'interventional' MRI.

Authors:  P Johal; A Williams; P Wragg; D Hunt; W Gedroyc
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  The contralateral knee joint in cruciate ligament deficiency.

Authors:  Michal Kozanek; Samuel K Van de Velde; Thomas J Gill; Guoan Li
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 6.202

10.  Anthropomorphic differences between the distal femora of men and women.

Authors:  Jess H Lonner; Jeff G Jasko; Beverly S Thomas
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  3 in total

1.  Gender differences in tibio-femoral kinematics and quadriceps muscle force during weight-bearing knee flexion in vitro.

Authors:  Markus Wünschel; Nikolaus Wülker; Otto Müller
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Functional knee assessment with advanced imaging.

Authors:  Keiko Amano; Qi Li; C Benjamin Ma
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-06

3.  Gender differences in the morphology of the trochlea and the distal femur.

Authors:  V Pinskerova; K Nemec; I Landor
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 4.342

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.