Literature DB >> 22056319

Early prodromal symptoms can predict future psychosis in familial high-risk youth.

Neeraj Tandon1, Debra Montrose, Jai Shah, R P Rajarethinam, Vaibhav A Diwadkar, Matcheri S Keshavan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Efforts to predict psychosis in individuals at high risk for schizophrenia have focused on the identification of sub-threshold clinical criteria and neurobiological markers, including neuropsychological assessment, structural and functional brain imaging, and psychophysiological testing. We sought to evaluate the relative utility of "psychosis-proneness" measures for prospective prediction of psychotic disorders in a group of young relatives at familial risk for schizophrenia.
METHODS: We examined the receiver operating characteristics of sub-threshold symptoms in predicting conversion to psychosis in a group of 97 young first- and second- degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia over a 2-year period. Towards this end, we utilized the Structured Interview of prodromal symptoms to derive measures of two of the four Scale of Prodromal Symptoms subscales (positive and disorganized) and the Chapman Magical Ideation and Perceptual Aberration scales. These four measures were, together, taken to reflect a putative index of psychosis-proneness.
RESULTS: Eleven of the 97 subjects developed a psychotic disorder over 2 years of follow-up. Seventeen of the 97 subjects tested positive on this index of psychosis-proneness at baseline and of these 10 converted to psychosis. The sensitivity and specificity of the test were 91 percent and 92 percent respectively. The positive predictive value of the test was 59 percent and its negative predictive value was 99 percent. Addition of measures of cognitive or social function to the index decreased its predictive ability, reducing its specificity and/or sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: A relatively simple set of clinical measures can be utilized to prospectively identify familial high risk individuals who convert to psychosis with high specificity and sensitivity. Implications for the proposed addition of an "attenuated psychosis syndrome" in DSM-5 are discussed.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22056319      PMCID: PMC3382078          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  46 in total

1.  Predicting the longitudinal effects of the family environment on prodromal symptoms and functioning in patients at-risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Danielle A Schlosser; Jamie L Zinberg; Rachel L Loewy; Shannon Casey-Cannon; Mary P O'Brien; Carrie E Bearden; Sophia Vinogradov; Tyrone D Cannon
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 2.  Neuroimaging predictors of transition to psychosis--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  R Smieskova; P Fusar-Poli; P Allen; K Bendfeldt; R D Stieglitz; J Drewe; E W Radue; P K McGuire; A Riecher-Rössler; S J Borgwardt
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2010-02-06       Impact factor: 8.989

3.  The psychosis risk syndrome and its proposed inclusion in the DSM-V: a risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  Cheryl M Corcoran; Michael B First; Barbara Cornblatt
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 4.939

Review 4.  Research in people with psychosis risk syndrome: a review of the current evidence and future directions.

Authors:  Christoph U Correll; Marta Hauser; Andrea M Auther; Barbara A Cornblatt
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 8.982

5.  Longitudinal alterations of executive function in non-psychotic adolescents at familial risk for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Tejas S Bhojraj; Vaibhav A Diwadkar; John A Sweeney; Konasale M Prasad; Shaun M Eack; Debra M Montrose; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 5.067

6.  Prediction of psychosis in adolescents and young adults at high risk: results from the prospective European prediction of psychosis study.

Authors:  Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Raimo K R Salokangas; Markus Heinimaa; Don Linszen; Peter Dingemans; Max Birchwood; Paul Patterson; Georg Juckel; Andreas Heinz; Anthony Morrison; Shôn Lewis; Heinrich Graf von Reventlow; Joachim Klosterkötter
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03

7.  Social dysfunction predicts two years clinical outcome in people at ultra high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  P Fusar-Poli; M Byrne; L Valmaggia; F Day; P Tabraham; L Johns; P McGuire
Journal:  J Psychiatr Res       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.791

8.  Validity of the prodromal risk syndrome for first psychosis: findings from the North American Prodrome Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  Scott W Woods; Jean Addington; Kristin S Cadenhead; Tyrone D Cannon; Barbara A Cornblatt; Robert Heinssen; Diana O Perkins; Larry J Seidman; Ming T Tsuang; Elaine F Walker; Thomas H McGlashan
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 9.  Intervention in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: a review and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick D McGorry; Barnaby Nelson; G Paul Amminger; Andreas Bechdolf; Shona M Francey; Gregor Berger; Anita Riecher-Rössler; Joachim Klosterkötter; Stephan Ruhrmann; Frauke Schultze-Lutter; Merete Nordentoft; Ian Hickie; Philip McGuire; Michael Berk; Eric Y H Chen; Matcheri S Keshavan; Alison R Yung
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.384

10.  Use of neuroanatomical pattern classification to identify subjects in at-risk mental states of psychosis and predict disease transition.

Authors:  Nikolaos Koutsouleris; Eva M Meisenzahl; Christos Davatzikos; Ronald Bottlender; Thomas Frodl; Johanna Scheuerecker; Gisela Schmitt; Thomas Zetzsche; Petra Decker; Maximilian Reiser; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Christian Gaser
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2009-07
View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Psychosis prediction and clinical utility in familial high-risk studies: selective review, synthesis, and implications for early detection and intervention.

Authors:  Jai L Shah; Neeraj Tandon; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 2.732

2.  Does hallucination perceptual modality impact psychosis risk?

Authors:  H F Niles; B C Walsh; S W Woods; A R Powers
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2019-08-16       Impact factor: 6.392

3.  The Network Structure of Schizotypal Personality Traits.

Authors:  Eduardo Fonseca-Pedrero; Javier Ortuño; Martin Debbané; Raymond C K Chan; David Cicero; Lisa C Zhang; Colleen Brenner; Emma Barkus; Richard J Linscott; Thomas Kwapil; Neus Barrantes-Vidal; Alex Cohen; Adrian Raine; Michael T Compton; Erin B Tone; Julie Suhr; Felix Inchausti; Julio Bobes; Axit Fumero; Stella Giakoumaki; Ioannis Tsaousis; Antonio Preti; Michael Chmielewski; Julien Laloyaux; Anwar Mechri; Mohamed Aymen Lahmar; Viviana Wuthrich; Frank Larøi; Johanna C Badcock; Assen Jablensky; Adela M Isvoranu; Sacha Epskamp; Eiko I Fried
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 9.306

4.  Multivariate prediction of emerging psychosis in adolescents at high risk for schizophrenia.

Authors:  Jai Shah; Shaun M Eack; Debra M Montrose; Neeraj Tandon; Jean M Miewald; Konasale M Prasad; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 4.939

5.  The "polyenviromic risk score": Aggregating environmental risk factors predicts conversion to psychosis in familial high-risk subjects.

Authors:  Jaya L Padmanabhan; Jai L Shah; Neeraj Tandon; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2016-10-29       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Attenuated psychosis and the schizophrenia prodrome: current status of risk identification and psychosis prevention.

Authors:  Neeraj Tandon; Jai Shah; Matcheri S Keshavan; Rajiv Tandon
Journal:  Neuropsychiatry (London)       Date:  2012

7.  Clinical psychopathology in youth at familial high risk for psychosis.

Authors:  Jai L Shah; Neeraj Tandon; Debra M Montrose; Diana Mermon; Shaun M Eack; Jean Miewald; Matcheri S Keshavan
Journal:  Early Interv Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 2.732

8.  Lifetime psychopathology in child and adolescent offspring of parents diagnosed with schizophrenia or bipolar disorder: a 2-year follow-up study.

Authors:  E De la Serna; D Ilzarbe; G Sugranyes; I Baeza; D Moreno; E Rodríguez-Toscano; A Espliego; M Ayora; S Romero; V Sánchez-Gistau; J Castro-Fornieles
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2020-03-07       Impact factor: 4.785

9.  Correspondence between psychometric and clinical high risk for psychosis in an undergraduate population.

Authors:  David C Cicero; Elizabeth A Martin; Theresa M Becker; Anna R Docherty; John G Kerns
Journal:  Psychol Assess       Date:  2014-04-07

10.  Biomarker Profiles in Psychosis Risk Groups Within Unaffected Relatives Based on Familiality and Age.

Authors:  Halide Bilge Türközer; Elena I Ivleva; Jayme Palka; Brett A Clementz; Rebecca Shafee; Godfrey D Pearlson; John A Sweeney; Matcheri S Keshavan; Elliot S Gershon; Carol A Tamminga
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 9.306

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.