Literature DB >> 22055691

Prostate sampling by 12-core biopsy: comparison of the biopsy results with tumor location in prostatectomy specimens.

Viacheslav Iremashvili1, Liset Pelaez, Merce Jorda, Murugesan Manoharan, Mohan Arianayagam, Daniel L Rosenberg, Mark S Soloway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the diagnostic performance of individual prostate biopsy cores. The 12-core transrectal prostate biopsy scheme has emerged as a standard of care. However, quality of sampling may vary in different areas of the prostate included in this procedure.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two-hundred fifty men underwent radical prostatectomy at our institution. All participants had a systematic 12-core transrectal prostate biopsy containing lateral and medial cores from each side of the apical, medial and basal thirds of the prostate. Biopsy results were matched with histologic maps of the prostatectomy specimens. Sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV), and overall accuracy were calculated for each biopsy core location and compared between different groups of cores. In addition, patients in the upper quartile of prostate weight were compared with the rest of the cohort.
RESULTS: Sensitivity, NPV, and overall accuracy were significantly lower for apical cores. Average NPV and overall accuracy of basal and mid-lateral biopsies were inferior to those of medial biopsies on the same levels. However, sensitivity of these lateral cores was similar to that of the medial cores. Sensitivities of apical and mid cores were significantly lower in patients with larger prostates.
CONCLUSION: Decreased accuracy in lateral mid- and basal cores results from higher frequencies of cancer in corresponding prostate areas, and therefore additional samples should be taken at these locations. In addition, diagnostic accuracy of apical cores may be improved through better targeting of the prostatic apex. This may be particularly important in patients with larger prostates.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22055691     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2011.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  7 in total

1.  Hematoma in Retzius' space following US-guided prostate biopsy: evidence of the diagnostic accuracy using transrectal end-fire probe in the anterior prostate gland.

Authors:  Lucio Dell'atti
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-01-09

2.  Hybrid 2D-3D ultrasound registration for navigated prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Sonia-Yuki Selmi; Emmanuel Promayon; Jocelyne Troccaz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Urinary TMPRSS2:ERG and PCA3 in an active surveillance cohort: results from a baseline analysis in the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.

Authors:  Daniel W Lin; Lisa F Newcomb; Elissa C Brown; James D Brooks; Peter R Carroll; Ziding Feng; Martin E Gleave; Raymond S Lance; Martin G Sanda; Ian M Thompson; John T Wei; Peter S Nelson
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Localization of higher grade tumor foci in potential candidates for active surveillance who opt for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sung Kyu Hong; James A Eastham; Samson W Fine
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2013-12-30

5.  Analysis of prostate cancer localization toward improved diagnostic accuracy of transperineal prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Yoshiro Sakamoto; Kaori Fukaya; Masaki Haraoka; Kosuke Kitamura; Yoichiro Toyonaga; Michio Tanaka; Shigeo Horie
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2014-06-17

6.  Analysis of preoperative detection for apex prostate cancer by transrectal biopsy.

Authors:  Tomokazu Sazuka; Takashi Imamoto; Takeshi Namekawa; Takanobu Utsumi; Mitsuru Yanagisawa; Koji Kawamura; Naoto Kamiya; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Takeshi Ueda; Satoshi Ota; Yukio Nakatani; Tomohiko Ichikawa
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2013-02-21

7.  Discordance between location of positive cores in biopsy and location of positive surgical margin following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Ji Won Kim; Hyoung Keun Park; Hyeong Gon Kim; Dong Yeub Ham; Sung Hyun Paick; Yong Soo Lho; Woo Suk Choi
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-10-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.