Literature DB >> 22055340

Exhausting attentional tracking resources with a single fast-moving object.

Alex O Holcombe1, Wei-Ying Chen.   

Abstract

Driving on a busy road, eluding a group of predators, or playing a team sport involves keeping track of multiple moving objects. In typical laboratory tasks, the number of visual targets that humans can track is about four. Three types of theories have been advanced to explain this limit. The fixed-limit theory posits a set number of attentional pointers available to follow objects. Spatial interference theory proposes that when targets are near each other, their attentional spotlights mutually interfere. Resource theory asserts that a limited resource is divided among targets, and performance reflects the amount available per target. Utilising widely separated objects to avoid spatial interference, the present experiments validated the predictions of resource theory. The fastest target speed at which two targets could be tracked was much slower than the fastest speed at which one target could be tracked. This speed limit for tracking two targets was approximately that predicted if at high speeds, only a single target could be tracked. This result cannot be accommodated by the fixed-limit or interference theories. Evidently a fast target, if it moves fast enough, can exhaust attentional resources. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22055340     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  13 in total

1.  Multiple identity tracking strategies vary by age: An ERP study.

Authors:  Didem Pehlivanoglu; Audrey Duarte; Paul Verhaeghen
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 2.  Changing concepts of working memory.

Authors:  Wei Ji Ma; Masud Husain; Paul M Bays
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Why do people appear not to extrapolate trajectories during multiple object tracking? A computational investigation.

Authors:  Sheng-Hua Zhong; Zheng Ma; Colin Wilson; Yan Liu; Jonathan I Flombaum
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Swapping or dropping? Electrophysiological measures of difficulty during multiple object tracking.

Authors:  Trafton Drew; Todd S Horowitz; Edward K Vogel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2012-11-07

5.  Divided attention in the tactile modality.

Authors:  Sharon Daniel; Thomas Andrillon; Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Jeroen J A van Boxtel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Within-hemifield competition in early visual areas limits the ability to track multiple objects with attention.

Authors:  Viola S Störmer; George A Alvarez; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Visuospatial Attention to Single and Multiple Objects Is Independently Impaired in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Daniel J Norton; Victoria A Nguyen; Michaela F Lewis; Gretchen O Reynolds; David C Somers; Alice Cronin-Golomb
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Hemifield effects in multiple identity tracking.

Authors:  Charlotte Hudson; Piers D L Howe; Daniel R Little
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Unveiling residual, spontaneous recovery from subtle hemispatial neglect three years after stroke.

Authors:  Mario Bonato
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Hemifield-specific control of spatial attention and working memory: Evidence from hemifield crossover costs.

Authors:  Roger W Strong; George A Alvarez
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.