Literature DB >> 22053760

The next evolutionary synthesis: from Lamarck and Darwin to genomic variation and systems biology.

Jonathan Bl Bard.   

Abstract

The evolutionary synthesis, the standard 20th century view of how evolutionary change occurs, is based on selection, heritable phenotypic variation and a very simple view of genes. It is therefore unable to incorporate two key aspects of modern molecular knowledge: first is the richness of genomic variation, so much more complicated than simple mutation, and second is the opaque relationship between the genotype and its resulting phenotype. Two new and important books shed some light on how we should view evolutionary change now. "Evolution: a view from the 21st century" by J.A. Shapiro (2011, FT Press Science, New Jersey, USA. pp. 246) examines the richness of genomic variation and its implications. "Transformations of Lamarckism: from Subtle Fluids to Molecular Biology" edited by S.B. Gissis & E. Jablonka (2011, MIT Press, Cambridge, USA. pp. 457) includes some 40 papers that anyone with an interest in the history of evolutionary thought and the relationship between the environment and the genome will want to read. This review discusses both books within the context of contemporary evolutionary thinking and points out that neither really comes to terms with today's key systems-biology question: how does mutation-induced variation in a molecular network generate variation in the resulting phenotype?

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22053760      PMCID: PMC3215633          DOI: 10.1186/1478-811X-9-30

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Commun Signal        ISSN: 1478-811X            Impact factor:   5.712


  6 in total

1.  Gene regulatory networks generating the phenomena of additivity, dominance and epistasis.

Authors:  S W Omholt; E Plahte; L Oyehaug; K Xiang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A systems biology view of evolutionary genetics: network-driven processes incorporate much more variation than evolutionary genetics can handle. This variation is hard to formalise but allows fast change.

Authors:  Jonathan Bard
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Speciation by distance in a ring species.

Authors:  Darren E Irwin; Staffan Bensch; Jessica H Irwin; Trevor D Price
Journal:  Science       Date:  2005-01-21       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  The evolution of homeobox genes: Implications for the study of brain development.

Authors:  Peter W H Holland; Tokiharu Takahashi
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 4.077

5.  The sudden appearance of diverse animal body plansduring the Cambrian explosion.

Authors:  Jun-Yuan Chen
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.203

6.  Regulation, necessity, and the misinterpretation of knockouts.

Authors:  Jamie Davies
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.345

  6 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  From Reductionism to Holism: Toward a More Complete View of Development Through Genome Engineering.

Authors:  Rebecca K Delker; Richard S Mann
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  The soft genome.

Authors:  Sarit Anava; Rachel Posner; Oded Rechavi
Journal:  Worm       Date:  2015-01-28

3.  The Lamarckian chicken and the Darwinian egg.

Authors:  Yitzhak Pilpel; Oded Rechavi
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.540

4.  Cooperation between phenotypic plasticity and genetic mutations can account for the cumulative selection in evolution.

Authors:  Ken Nishikawa; Akira R Kinjo
Journal:  Biophysics (Nagoya-shi)       Date:  2014-12-17

Review 5.  Guest list or black list: heritable small RNAs as immunogenic memories.

Authors:  Oded Rechavi
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 20.808

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.