Literature DB >> 22052672

Determinants of discordance in patients' and physicians' rating of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity.

Nasim A Khan1, Horace J Spencer, Esam Abda, Amita Aggarwal, Rieke Alten, Codrina Ancuta, Daina Andersone, Martin Bergman, Jurgen Craig-Muller, Jacqueline Detert, Lia Georgescu, Laure Gossec, Hisham Hamoud, Johannes W G Jacobs, Ieda Maria Magalhaes Laurindo, Maria Majdan, Antonio Naranjo, Sapan Pandya, Christof Pohl, Georg Schett, Zahraa I Selim, Sergio Toloza, Hisahi Yamanaka, Tuulikki Sokka.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the determinants of patients' (PTGL) and physicians' (MDGL) global assessment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) activity and factors associated with discordance among them.
METHODS: A total of 7,028 patients in the Quantitative Standard Monitoring of Patients with RA study had PTGL and MDGL assessed at the same clinic visit on a 0-10-cm visual analog scale (VAS). Three patient groups were defined: concordant rating group (PTGL and MDGL within ±2 cm), higher patient rating group (PTGL exceeding MDGL by >2 cm), and lower patient rating group (PTGL less than MDGL by >2 cm). Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify determinants of PTGL and MDGL and their discordance.
RESULTS: The mean ± SD VAS scores for PTGL and MDGL were 4.01 ± 2.70 and 2.91 ± 2.37, respectively. Pain was overwhelmingly the single most important determinant of PTGL, followed by fatigue. In contrast, MDGL was most influenced by swollen joint count (SJC), followed by erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and tender joint count (TJC). A total of 4,454 (63.4%), 2,106 (30%), and 468 (6.6%) patients were in the concordant, higher, and lower patient rating groups, respectively. Odds of higher patient rating increased with higher pain, fatigue, psychological distress, age, and morning stiffness, and decreased with higher SJC, TJC, and ESR. Lower patient rating odds increased with higher SJC, TJC, and ESR, and decreased with lower fatigue levels.
CONCLUSION: Nearly 36% of patients had discordance in RA activity assessment from their physicians. Sensitivity to the "disease experience" of patients, particularly pain and fatigue, is warranted for effective care of RA.
Copyright © 2012 by the American College of Rheumatology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22052672      PMCID: PMC3703925          DOI: 10.1002/acr.20685

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)        ISSN: 2151-464X            Impact factor:   4.794


  42 in total

1.  The disease activity score is not suitable as the sole criterion for initiation and evaluation of anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in the clinic: discordance between assessment measures and limitations in questionnaire use for regulatory purposes.

Authors:  Frederick Wolfe; Kaleb Michaud; Theodore Pincus; Daniel Furst; Edward Keystone
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2005-12

Review 2.  Cross cultural aspects of rehabilitation in rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Ade O Adebajo; James A Alegbeleye
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.006

3.  Trust in physicians and elements of the medical interaction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Javier P Berrios-Rivera; Richard L Street; Maria G Garcia Popa-Lisseanu; Michael A Kallen; Marsha N Richardson; Namieta M Janssen; Donald M Marcus; John D Reveille; Noranna B Warner; Maria E Suarez-Almazor
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2006-06-15

4.  Collaborative management of chronic illness.

Authors:  M Von Korff; J Gruman; J Schaefer; S J Curry; E H Wagner
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-12-15       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Genetic basis for individual variations in pain perception and the development of a chronic pain condition.

Authors:  Luda Diatchenko; Gary D Slade; Andrea G Nackley; Konakporn Bhalang; Asgeir Sigurdsson; Inna Belfer; David Goldman; Ke Xu; Svetlana A Shabalina; Dmitry Shagin; Mitchell B Max; Sergei S Makarov; William Maixner
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-11-10       Impact factor: 6.150

6.  The patient's perspective and rheumatoid arthritis disease activity indexes.

Authors:  B F Leeb; I Andel; S Leder; B A Leeb; B Rintelen
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2004-11-30       Impact factor: 7.580

7.  Minimal clinically important improvement and patient acceptable symptom state for subjective outcome measures in rheumatic disorders.

Authors:  Florence Tubach; Philippe Ravaud; Dorcas Beaton; Maarten Boers; Claire Bombardier; David T Felson; Desireé van der Heijde; George Wells; Maxime Dougados
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 4.666

8.  A proposed 30-45 minute 4 page standard protocol to evaluate rheumatoid arthritis (SPERA) that includes measures of inflammatory activity, joint damage, and longterm outcomes.

Authors:  T Pincus; R H Brooks; L F Callahan
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.666

9.  Predictors of adherence to treatment in women with fibromyalgia.

Authors:  Patricia L Dobkin; Aurelio Sita; Maida J Sewitch
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2006 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.442

10.  Lack of agreement between patients' and physicians' perspectives of rheumatoid arthritis disease activity changes.

Authors:  B F Leeb; J Sautner; B A Leeb; C Fassl; B Rintelen
Journal:  Scand J Rheumatol       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  64 in total

1.  Longitudinal Occurrence and Predictors of Patient-Provider Discordance Between Global Assessments of Disease Activity in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Divya N V Challa; Zoran Kvrgic; Cynthia S Crowson; Eric L Matteson; Thomas G Mason; Clement J Michet; Daniel E Schaffer; Kerry A Wright; John M Davis
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12-10       Impact factor: 4.794

2.  Level of patient-physician agreement in assessment of change following conservative rehabilitation for shoulder pain.

Authors:  Stephanie D Moore-Reed; W Ben Kibler; Heather Bush; Tim L Uhl
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2016-07-15

3.  Individual patient monitoring in daily clinical practice: a critical evaluation of minimal important change.

Authors:  Jos Hendrikx; Jaap Fransen; Wietske Kievit; Piet L C M van Riel
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Affective disturbance in rheumatoid arthritis: psychological and disease-related pathways.

Authors:  John A Sturgeon; Patrick H Finan; Alex J Zautra
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 20.543

5.  The influence of fibromyalgia on achieving remission in patients with long-standing rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Fausto Salaffi; Maria Chiara Gerardi; Fabiola Atzeni; Alberto Batticciotto; Rossella Talotta; Antonella Draghessi; Marco Di Carlo; Piercarlo Sarzi-Puttini
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 2.631

Review 6.  Establishing a core domain set to measure rheumatoid arthritis flares: report of the OMERACT 11 RA flare Workshop.

Authors:  Vivian P Bykerk; Elisabeth Lie; Susan J Bartlett; Rieke Alten; Annelies Boonen; Robin Christensen; Daniel E Furst; Sarah Hewlett; Amye L Leong; Anne Lyddiatt; Lyn March; James E May; Pam Montie; Ana-Maria Orbai; Christoph Pohl; Marieke Scholte Voshaar; Thasia Woodworth; Clifton O Bingham; Ernest H Choy
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Standards of Comparison and Discordance in Rheumatoid Arthritis Global Assessments Between Patients and Clinicians.

Authors:  Michael M Ward; Lori C Guthrie; Maria I Alba
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.794

8.  What Does the Patient Global Health Assessment in Rheumatoid Arthritis Really Tell Us? Contribution of Specific Dimensions of Health-Related Quality of Life.

Authors:  Ethan T Craig; Jamie Perin; Scott Zeger; Jeffrey R Curtis; Vivian P Bykerk; Clifton O Bingham; Susan J Bartlett
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 9.  Patient-reported outcomes in core domain sets for rheumatic diseases.

Authors:  Lilian H D van Tuyl; Maarten Boers
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 20.543

10.  Understanding how patients (vs physicians) approach the decision to escalate treatment: a proposed conceptual model.

Authors:  Liana Fraenkel; Elizabeth K Seng; Meaghan Cunningham; Kristin Mattocks
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.