Literature DB >> 22052433

Interlaboratory Pig-a gene mutation assay trial: Studies of 1,3-propane sultone with immunomagnetic enrichment of mutant erythrocytes.

Stephen D Dertinger1, Souk Phonethepswath, Pamela Weller, Svetlana Avlasevich, Dorothea K Torous, Jared A Mereness, Steven M Bryce, Jeffrey C Bemis, Sara Bell, Susan Portugal, Michael Aylott, James T MacGregor.   

Abstract

An international collaborative trial was established to systematically investigate the merits and limitations of a rat in vivo Pig-a gene mutation assay. The product of this gene is essential for anchoring CD59 to the plasma membrane, and mutations in this gene are identified by flow cytometric quantification of circulating erythrocytes without cell surface CD59 expression. Initial interlaboratory data from rats treated with several potent mutagens have been informative, but the time required for those flow cytometric analyses (∼20 min per sample) limited the number of cells that could be interrogated for the mutant phenotype. Thus, it was desirable to establish a new higher throughput scoring approach before expanding the trial to include weak mutagens or nongenotoxicants. An immunomagnetic column separation method that dramatically increases analysis rates was therefore developed (Dertinger et al. [2011]: Mutat Res 721:163-170). To evaluate this new method for use in the international collaborative trial, studies were conducted to determine the mutagenic response of male Sprague Dawley rats treated for 3 or 28 consecutive days with several doses of 1,3-propane sultone (1,3-PS). Pig-a mutant frequencies were measured over a period of several weeks and were supplemented with another indicator of genetic toxicity, peripheral blood micronucleated reticulocyte (MN-RET) counts. 1,3-PS was found to increase Pig-a mutation and MN-RET frequencies in both 3- and 28-day study designs. While the greatest induction of MN-RETs was observed in the 3-day study, the highest Pig-a responses were found with 28-days of treatment. Pig-a measurements were acquired in approximately one-third the time required in the original method, while the number of erythrocyte and reticulocyte equivalents analyzed per sample were increased by factors of 100 and 10, respectively. The data strongly support the value of using the immunomagnetic separation technique for enumerating Pig-a mutation frequencies. These results also demonstrate that the ongoing international trial will benefit from the inclusion of studies that are based on both acute and protracted repeat dosing schedules in conjunction with the acquisition of longitudinal data, at least until more data have been accumulated.
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22052433     DOI: 10.1002/em.20671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen        ISSN: 0893-6692            Impact factor:   3.216


  15 in total

1.  Comparison of male versus female responses in the Pig-a mutation assay.

Authors:  Carson Labash; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Kristine Carlson; Dorothea K Torous; Ariel Berg; Jeffrey C Bemis; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.000

2.  Integration of Pig-a, micronucleus, chromosome aberration and comet assay endpoints in a 28-day rodent toxicity study with urethane.

Authors:  Leon F Stankowski; Marilyn J Aardema; Timothy E Lawlor; Kamala Pant; Shambhu Roy; Yong Xu; Reem Elbekai
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.000

3.  Both PIGA and PIGL mutations cause GPI-a deficient isolates in the Tk6 cell line.

Authors:  Janice A Nicklas; Elizabeth W Carter; Richard J Albertini
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.216

4.  Pig-a gene mutation assay study design: critical assessment of 3- versus 28-day repeat-dose treatment schedules.

Authors:  Azeddine Elhajouji; Tamsanqa Tafara Hove; Oliver O'Connell; Hansjoerg Martus; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2020-09-12       Impact factor: 3.000

5.  In vivo pig-a and micronucleus study of the prototypical aneugen vinblastine sulfate.

Authors:  Svetlana L Avlasevich; Carson Labash; Dorothea K Torous; Jeffrey C Bemis; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Persistence of cisplatin-induced mutagenicity in hematopoietic stem cells: implications for secondary cancer risk following chemotherapy.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Dorothea K Torous; Jeffrey C Bemis; Souk Phonethepswath; Carson Labash; Kristine Carlson; Jared Mereness; John Cottom; James Palis; James T MacGregor
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Induction of Pig-a mutant erythrocytes in male and female rats exposed to 1,3-propane sultone, ethyl carbamate, or thiotepa.

Authors:  Carson Labash; Kristine Carlson; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Ariel Berg; Jeffrey C Bemis; James T MacGregor; Stephen D Dertinger
Journal:  Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 2.873

8.  Predictions of genotoxic potential, mode of action, molecular targets, and potency via a tiered multiflow® assay data analysis strategy.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Andrew R Kraynak; Ryan P Wheeldon; Derek T Bernacki; Steven M Bryce; Nikki Hall; Jeffrey C Bemis; Sheila M Galloway; Patricia A Escobar; George E Johnson
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.216

9.  Sensitivity of the Pig-a assay for detecting gene mutation in rats exposed acutely to strong clastogens.

Authors:  Javed A Bhalli; Joseph G Shaddock; Mason G Pearce; Vasily N Dobrovolsky
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Efficient monitoring of in vivo pig-a gene mutation and chromosomal damage: summary of 7 published studies and results from 11 new reference compounds.

Authors:  Stephen D Dertinger; Souk Phonethepswath; Svetlana L Avlasevich; Dorothea K Torous; Jared Mereness; Steven M Bryce; Jeffrey C Bemis; Sara Bell; Pamela Weller; James T Macgregor
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 4.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.