Literature DB >> 22052325

Hormone therapy use and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women.

Elisabeth Couto1, Samera Azeem Qureshi, Solveig Hofvind, Marit Hilsen, Hildegunn Aase, Per Skaane, Lars Vatten, Giske Ursin.   

Abstract

While studies have shown that use of postmenopausal hormone therapy with estrogen and progestogen (EPT) increases mammographic density, aspects of this association remain unclear. We examined whether mammographic density differed by type of hormone therapy (HT) used, dose, duration of use, time since last use, and whether the effects are modified by age and body mass index (BMI). Using a cross-sectional design, we recruited 2,424 postmenopausal women aged 50-69 years participating in the Norwegian Breast Cancer Screening Program. Mammographic density was assessed with a computer-assisted method, and we estimated mean absolute and percent mammographic density through multiple linear regression, and adjusting for possible confounders. Mammographic density was higher among current HT users (percent density: 22.6%; 95% CI: 22.1-23.2%) than among former (17.7%; 17.2-18.2%) or never users (16.3%; 15.7-16.8%). The highest density was seen in current EPT users of high-dose norethisterone acetate (NETA) regimens who had a percent density of 26.2% (24.3-28.1%). Results differed when considering the combined effect of age and BMI. The effect of EPT on mammographic density was modified by age and BMI, with no apparent association among the youngest women (aged 50-55) with the highest BMI (BMI ≥ 26). A higher mammographic density was found in EPT users compared to never HT users, particularly in women using high-dose NETA regimens. Age and BMI modified the association between EPT use and mammographic density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22052325     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-011-1810-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  10 in total

1.  Menopausal hormone therapy and breast cancer risk: effect modification by body mass through life.

Authors:  Marie Søfteland Sandvei; Lars J Vatten; Elisabeth Krefting Bjelland; Anne Eskild; Solveig Hofvind; Giske Ursin; Signe Opdahl
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-08-06       Impact factor: 8.082

2.  A Longitudinal Study of the Association between Mammographic Density and Gene Expression in Normal Breast Tissue.

Authors:  Helga Bergholtz; Tonje Gulbrandsen Lien; Giske Ursin; Marit Muri Holmen; Åslaug Helland; Therese Sørlie; Vilde Drageset Haakensen
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.673

Review 3.  Postmenopausal hormone therapy: risks and benefits.

Authors:  Serge Rozenberg; Jean Vandromme; Caroline Antoine
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 43.330

4.  Mammographic density: intersection of advocacy, science, and clinical practice.

Authors:  Katherine Tossas-Milligan; Sundus Shalabi; Veronica Jones; Patricia J Keely; Matthew W Conklin; Kevin W Elicerie; Robert Winn; Christopher Sistrunk; Joseph Geradts; Gustavo Miranda-Carboni; Eric C Dietze; Lisa D Yee; Victoria L Seewaldt
Journal:  Curr Breast Cancer Rep       Date:  2019-07-24

5.  Benign breast tissue composition in breast cancer patients: association with risk factors, clinical variables, and gene expression.

Authors:  Xuezheng Sun; Rupninder Sandhu; Jonine D Figueroa; Gretchen L Gierach; Mark E Sherman; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Vitamin D intake, month the mammogram was taken and mammographic density in Norwegian women aged 50-69.

Authors:  Merete Ellingjord-Dale; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva; Tom Grotmol; Amrit Kaur Sakhi; Solveig Hofvind; Samera Qureshi; Marianne Skov Markussen; Elisabeth Couto; Linda Vos; Giske Ursin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Hormone replacement therapy and mammographic density: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Shadi Azam; Katja Kemp Jacobsen; Arja R Aro; Elsebeth Lynge; Zorana Jovanovic Andersen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Mammographic Breast Density of Japanese Women Living in Australia: Implications for Breast Screening Policy.

Authors:  Miwa M Mizukoshi; Syeda Z Hossain; Ann Poulos
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2019-09-01

9.  Polymorphisms in hormone metabolism and growth factor genes and mammographic density in Norwegian postmenopausal hormone therapy users and non-users.

Authors:  Merete Ellingjord-Dale; Eunjung Lee; Elisabeth Couto; Ali Ozhand; Samera Qureshi; Solveig Hofvind; David J Van Den Berg; Lars A Akslen; Tom Grotmol; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Mammographic Density Distribution in Ras Al Khaimah (RAK): Relationships with Demographic and Reproductive Factors

Authors:  Salman M Albeshan; Syeda Z Hossain; Martin G Mackey; Delgermaa Demchig; Jennifer K Peat; Patrick C Brennan
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-06-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.