Literature DB >> 22052105

Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: initial experience from 30 consecutive patients.

Tayfun Karahasanoglu1, Ismail Hamzaoglu, Bilgi Baca, Erman Aytac, Ilknur Erguner, Cihan Uras.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Robotic surgery offers 3D visualization and the advantage of the usage of multi-articulated instruments with superior dexterity. Theoretically, it can overcome many limitations of laparoscopic rectal surgery in the narrow pelvis.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2010 and January 2011, the patients who underwent robotic rectal resection for cancer were retrospectively evaluated in terms of demographics, operative data, complications, the duration of hospital stay, and histopathological data.
RESULTS: Thirty consecutive patients made up of 13 female and 17 male patients underwent robotic rectal resection. Sphincter-saving mesorectal excision was performed in 27 patients. Of these, there were 19 total and 8 partial mesorectal excisions. The mean operative time was 270 min (175-480 min). The median postoperative hospital stay was 4 days (4-20 days). No operation was converted. The complication rate was 13.3%. One patient died due to colonic necrosis caused by Drummond artery deficiency (3.3%). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 15 (3-38), and the distal resection margin was 4 cm (2-8). Histopathological evaluation revealed that the mesorectum resection was complete in all patients.
CONCLUSION: Robotic rectal surgery (hybrid or totally robotic) is a safe and feasible procedure when performed by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22052105     DOI: 10.1007/s11605-011-1737-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg        ISSN: 1091-255X            Impact factor:   3.452


  20 in total

Review 1.  Efficacy of the Da Vinci surgical system in abdominal surgery compared with that of laparoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sergio Maeso; Mercedes Reza; Julio A Mayol; Juan A Blasco; Mercedes Guerra; Elena Andradas; María N Plana
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? A systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery.

Authors:  A H Mirnezami; R Mirnezami; A K Venkatasubramaniam; K Chandrakumaran; T D Cecil; B J Moran
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a comparative analysis of oncological safety and short-term outcomes.

Authors:  P P Bianchi; C Ceriani; A Locatelli; G Spinoglio; M G Zampino; A Sonzogni; C Crosta; B Andreoni
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-05       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Impact of increased body mass index on laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Tayfun Karahasanoglu; Ismail Hamzaoglu; Bilgi Baca; Erman Aytac; Ebru Kirbiyik
Journal:  Eur Surg Res       Date:  2011-01-11       Impact factor: 1.745

5.  Short-term endpoints of conventional versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery in patients with colorectal cancer (MRC CLASICC trial): multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Pierre J Guillou; Philip Quirke; Helen Thorpe; Joanne Walker; David G Jayne; Adrian M H Smith; Richard M Heath; Julia M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 14-20       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Short-term outcomes after robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Minia Hellan; Casandra Anderson; Joshua D I Ellenhorn; Benjamin Paz; Alessio Pigazzi
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.344

7.  Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a prospective comparative study.

Authors:  Seung Hyuk Baik; Hye Youn Kwon; Jin Soo Kim; Hyuk Hur; Seung Kook Sohn; Chang Hwan Cho; Hoguen Kim
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-03-17       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Robotic tumor-specific mesorectal excision of rectal cancer: short-term outcome of a pilot randomized trial.

Authors:  S H Baik; Y T Ko; C M Kang; W J Lee; N K Kim; S K Sohn; H S Chi; C H Cho
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A comparison of laparoscopically assisted and open colectomy for colon cancer.

Authors:  Heidi Nelson; Daniel J Sargent; H Sam Wieand; James Fleshman; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; David Ota
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Short-term outcomes from a prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Neudecker; F Klein; R Bittner; T Carus; A Stroux; W Schwenk
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  4 in total

1.  European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery.

Authors:  Amir Szold; Roberto Bergamaschi; Ivo Broeders; Jenny Dankelman; Antonello Forgione; Thomas Langø; Andreas Melzer; Yoav Mintz; Salvador Morales-Conde; Michael Rhodes; Richard Satava; Chung-Ngai Tang; Ramon Vilallonga
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Outcomes of robotic-assisted colorectal surgery compared with laparoscopic and open surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Chang Woo Kim; Chang Hee Kim; Seung Hyuk Baik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Robotic-Assisted Surgery with Traditional Laparotomy for Rectal Cancer-Indian Study.

Authors:  S P Somashekhar; K R Ashwin; Jaka Rajashekhar; Shabber Zaveri
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes.

Authors:  Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo; Victor Edmond Seid; Sidney Klajner
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 5.742

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.