Literature DB >> 22050990

Papillary muscle relocation in conjunction with valve annuloplasty improve repair results in severe ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Khalil Fattouch1, Patrizio Lancellotti, Sebastiano Castrovinci, Giacomo Murana, Roberta Sampognaro, Egle Corrado, Marco Caruso, Giuseppe Speziale, Salvatore Novo, Giovanni Ruvolo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The incidence of recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR) after restrictive annuloplasty (RA) was 5% to 20% in several reports. There are many opinions in favor of adding subvalvular procedures to RA to reduce the tenting forces and improve the repair results.
METHODS: From March 2003 to May 2010, 55 patients with severe ischemic MR who had undergone papillary muscle (PPM) relocation in conjunction with mitral annuloplasty in our institutions were enrolled. The patients were matched 1:1 with those who underwent isolated RA using the propensity score. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 42% ± 6%. The mean tenting area and coaptation depth was 3.2 ± 0.6 cm(2) and 1.3 ± 0.2 cm, respectively. The study endpoints were early mortality and clinical and echocardiographic outcomes, freedom from cardiac-related deaths, and cardiac-related events.
RESULTS: In-hospital death occurred in 5 patients (4.5%), without a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .72). The 5-year freedom from cardiac-related deaths and cardiac-related events in the PPM relocation group versus the RA group was 90.9% ± 1.8% versus 89% ± 1.6% (P = .82) and 83% ± 2.1% versus 65.4% ± 1.2% (P < .001), respectively. Recurrent MR equal to or greater than moderate occurred in 2 (3.7%) and 6 (11.5%) patients in the PPM relocation group and RA group (P = .01), respectively. Moreover, we found statistically significant differences for the postoperative mean tenting area and coaptation depth in both groups (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: PPM relocation in conjunction to mitral annuloplasty is an easy and safe method and can be performed without an increase in-hospital mortality. This technique reduced the tenting area and coaptation depth compared with isolated RA, leading to improvement in the incidence of recurrent MR. The PPM group of patients experienced fewer cardiac-related events.
Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22050990     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.09.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  18 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic decision-making for patients with fluctuating mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Patrizio Lancellotti; Khalil Fattouch; Giovanni La Canna
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 2.  Benefits of submitral procedures for ischemic mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Satoru Wakasa; Yoshiro Matsui
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-07-15

Review 3.  Functional mitral regurgitation: an overview for surgical management framework.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avatar Singh; Orlando Santana; Christos G Mihos
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Comparison of mitral competence after mitral repair with papillary muscle approximation versus papillary muscle relocation for functional mitral regurgitation.

Authors:  Koji Furukawa; Mitsuhiro Yano; Eisaku Nakamura; Masakazu Matsuyama; Masanori Nishimura; Katsuya Kawagoe; Kunihide Nakamura
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-08-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 5.  The Choice of Treatment in Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation With Reduced Left Ventricular Function.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Muralidhar Padala; David Attias; Mohammed Nejjari; Christos G Mihos; Umberto Benedetto; Robert Michler
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2019-08-22       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Surgical strategy for ischemic mitral regurgitation adopting subvalvular and ventricular procedures.

Authors:  Satoru Wakasa; Yasushige Shingu; Tomonori Ooka; Hiroki Katoh; Tsuyoshi Tachibana; Yoshiro Matsui
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.520

Review 7.  Surgical Treatment of Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation: Valve Repair Versus Replacement.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Sahil Agrawal; Sunny Goel; Jeffrey S Borer
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  Surgical management of moderate ischemic mitral valve regurgitation: Where do we stand?

Authors:  Khalil Fattouch; Sebastiano Castrovinci; Giacomo Murana; Marco Moscarelli; Giuseppe Speziale
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-26

9.  Dynamic Three-Dimensional Geometry of the Tricuspid Valve Annulus in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome with a Fontan Circulation.

Authors:  Alex V Nguyen; Andras Lasso; Hannah H Nam; Jennifer Faerber; Ahmed H Aly; Alison M Pouch; Adam B Scanlan; Francis X McGowan; Laura Mercer-Rosa; Meryl S Cohen; John Simpson; Gabor Fichtinger; Matthew A Jolley
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 5.251

10.  Mid-term results of mitral valve repair for ischemic mitral regurgitation adjusted according to the degree of remodeling progression.

Authors:  Koji Furukawa; Mitsuhiro Yano; Eisaku Nakamura; Masanori Nishimura; Kunihide Nakamura
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-08-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.